It sounds like the bishop was acting quickly, but it does indicate that they investigated, so there must have been something to it. Furthermore, he may have had other questionable incidents in his past, but they just didn’t go that far (whatever it was) or were one of those things that make people uncomfortable but aren’t really clear enough to identify.
I’d rather see them act quickly than let it drag out. Most bishops are so lily-livered and afraid of offending that they wait until there’s practically a video available before they do anything.
If there is a clear understanding that wrongdoing took place, I agree. I don’t like the idea of Priests being subject to railroading anymore than anyone else, but I don’t think that’s what we’re seeing here.
Thanks for the comments.