Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mother Needing Transplant Refused Dead Daughter's Kidney Despite Girl's Deathbed Plea
Daily Mail.uk ^ | April 12, 2008 | Chris Brooke

Posted on 04/12/2008 10:39:56 AM PDT by freerepublic_or_die

With her mother desperately in need of a transplant, Laura Ashworth told family and friends she wanted to donate one of her kidneys.

So when the 21-year-old died after an asthma attack, it seemed that the tragedy would at least give Rachel Leake a chance of a healthy new life. But because Laura had not begun the formal process of becoming a "living donor," the authorities refused to let her mother receive her organs. Instead they went to strangers at the top of the waiting list.

Rachel Leake says her daughter Laura 'would be devastated that she was not able to help me'"All I wanted to do was carry out her wishes," said 39-year-old Mrs Leake. "She would have been so upset that she was not able to help her mum. Even the transplant coordinator was crying her eyes out. She really tried to get her bosses to change their minds but they would not budge."

Although the Human Tissue Authority has the power to allow "directed" donor requests of this kind, a blanket ban is in force while an ethical review of such transplants is carried out. Despite an appeal to health ministers by the family's MP, Gerry Sutcliffe, Laura's kidneys went to a man in Sheffield and a man in London, while her liver was given to a 15-year-old girl.

Mrs Leake urgently needs another kidney and as a diabetic she could also have benefited from receiving her daughter's pancreas. She had a kidney transplant five years ago, but the donated organ failed last year and she needs dialysis in hospital three times a week to stay alive.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: socialism; socializedmedicine
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last
I am not sure but I'd say the socialized medical care aka socialized medicine that is instituted in England has got a lot to do with what created this horror story including the highly imaginative title of Transplant Coordinator. (ugh!)
1 posted on 04/12/2008 10:39:57 AM PDT by freerepublic_or_die
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: freerepublic_or_die

Socialized medicine ... bring it on ....


2 posted on 04/12/2008 10:41:09 AM PDT by SkyDancer ("I Believe In Law Until It Interferes With Justice")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freerepublic_or_die

The STATE will decide you gets your PARTS.


3 posted on 04/12/2008 10:41:44 AM PDT by the invisib1e hand ( If you can keep your head when all about you are losing theirs and blaming it on you...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freerepublic_or_die

ps - Do the British know that Monty Python wrote most of their laws??


4 posted on 04/12/2008 10:42:00 AM PDT by SkyDancer ("I Believe In Law Until It Interferes With Justice")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: the invisib1e hand
I mean... The STATE will decide you who gets your PARTS.
5 posted on 04/12/2008 10:42:27 AM PDT by the invisib1e hand ( If you can keep your head when all about you are losing theirs and blaming it on you...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: freerepublic_or_die; socialismisinsidious

(Expletive deleted) bureaucratic scumbags.
ping


6 posted on 04/12/2008 10:45:29 AM PDT by darkangel82 (If you're not part of the solution, you are part of the problem. (Say no to RINOs))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freerepublic_or_die

Human Tissue Authority ?


7 posted on 04/12/2008 10:48:17 AM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Godspeed ... ICE’s toll-free tip hotline —1-866-DHS-2-ICE ... 9/11 .. Never FoRGeT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freerepublic_or_die

“the authorities refused to let her mother receive her organs. “

Evil.
Nothing more, nothing less...


8 posted on 04/12/2008 10:49:42 AM PDT by HereInTheHeartland ("We have to drain the swamp" George Bush, September 2001)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyDancer

You silly English pig dogs, I laugh at you and your crazy socialized medicine.

9 posted on 04/12/2008 10:50:35 AM PDT by Stonewall Jackson (Accept the challenges so that you can feel the exhilaration of victory. - George Patton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: darkangel82
While I absolutely believe that daughter should have had the right to donate to her mother directly, it looks like that might have been a poor medical decision. Mom has already rejected a donated kidney and is also diabetic.

People have the right to make poor decisions. The girl made life better for some people, even if none of those people were her mother. I hope they can take some comfort from that.

10 posted on 04/12/2008 10:51:55 AM PDT by Dianna
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Dianna

Hopefully.


11 posted on 04/12/2008 10:55:18 AM PDT by darkangel82 (If you're not part of the solution, you are part of the problem. (Say no to RINOs))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: 8mmMauser

Parts ping...


12 posted on 04/12/2008 10:55:46 AM PDT by TheSarce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stonewall Jackson

ROFLMAO!!!! that was righteous .....


13 posted on 04/12/2008 10:56:23 AM PDT by SkyDancer ("I Believe In Law Until It Interferes With Justice")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Dianna

I see, so in your opinion a “poor medical decision” should arbitrarily be overturned by some scumbag politician acting in the name of the “Human Tissue Authority”. Are you nuts? Tell me, would you really take comfort knowing that your dead daughter’s organs went to some stranger instead of prolonging or saving your, the mother’s life? Unbelievable that you could somehow justify this - the state being in control of your organs at death and using them against your wishes. I can think of few things more disgusting....


14 posted on 04/12/2008 11:02:11 AM PDT by Alright_on_the_LeftCoast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: darkangel82
"(Expletive deleted) bureaucratic scumbags."

Ditto.

15 posted on 04/12/2008 11:04:50 AM PDT by spunkets ("Freedom is about authority", Rudy Giuliani, gun grabber)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: freerepublic_or_die

It’s obvious that neither Mom nor daughter are/were smokers. Smokers are routinely denied transplants or even surgery under such medical care systems. The donor organs of smokers here in the US are routinely rejected as well.


16 posted on 04/12/2008 11:10:17 AM PDT by Gabz (Don't tell my mom I'm a lobbyist, she thinks I'm a piano player in a whorehouse)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

lol. Yes, indeed, the Transplant Coordinator in fact works for the HTA.


17 posted on 04/12/2008 11:17:49 AM PDT by freerepublic_or_die (The Motto of an American Patriot:Live Free or Die.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Alright_on_the_LeftCoast; Dianna; All
I see, so in your opinion a “poor medical decision” should arbitrarily be overturned by some scumbag politician acting in the name of the “Human Tissue Authority”. Are you nuts? Tell me, would you really take comfort knowing that your dead daughter’s organs went to some stranger instead of prolonging or saving your, the mother’s life? Unbelievable that you could somehow justify this - the state being in control of your organs at death and using them against your wishes. I can think of few things more disgusting....

I'm not a donor because my organs can't be sold upon my death. Why should the hospital, surgeon, etc., etc., be able to bill a patient for their services, yet the most important part of the surgery, i.e.; my organs be given away, free of charge?

18 posted on 04/12/2008 11:21:24 AM PDT by britt reed (What if the Founding Fathers had "just stayed home"?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Dianna

People have the right to make poor decisions


No bureacratic drones HAVE THE RIGHT TO take away the right of who gets an individual’s body parts.

We allow women to MURDER their kids IN THE WOMB and throw them in the garbage but just dare decide to give an intrinsic body part to someone of their choice and the self styled “ethicists” deny that right...what a crazy evil world.


19 posted on 04/12/2008 11:23:02 AM PDT by eleni121 (EN TOUTO NIKA!! +)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Alright_on_the_LeftCoast
I see, so in your opinion a “poor medical decision” should arbitrarily be overturned by some scumbag politician acting in the name of the “Human Tissue Authority”. Are you nuts?

That isn't what I said at all. I would absolutely support the direct donation from daughter to mother. They have the RIGHT to make that decision. Personally, I feel it would have likely been a poor decision. That doesn't mean they don't have the right to make it.

However, now that all is said and done, the only comfort they CAN take is that some people were helped.

20 posted on 04/12/2008 11:23:55 AM PDT by Dianna
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson