Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New Mexico commission orders $6,000 fine for Christian beliefs
AFA ^ | April 11, 2008 | Jeff Johnson

Posted on 04/11/2008 8:26:38 AM PDT by NYer

New MexicoA Christian law firm will appeal a ruling by the New Mexico Human Rights Commission fining a photographer who refused to take photos of a homosexual commitment ceremony.

 

Elaine Huguenin and her husband Jon, who co-own Elane Photography in Albuquerque, New Mexico, are both Christians. So when a lesbian couple asked them to photograph their "commitment ceremony" in Taos, the Huguenins politely refused. In response, Vanessa Willock filed a complaint with the New Mexico Human Rights Commission claiming the Huguenins discriminated against her because of her "sexual orientation." On Wednesday, the Commission found the Christian couple guilty of discrimination under state anti-discrimination laws and ordered them to pay more than $6,000 in costs.
 
Jordan Lorence with the Alliance Defense Fund (ADF) represented the Huguenins. He contends the lawsuit reflects an attitude among homosexual activists.
 
"This decision is a stunning disregard for religious liberty and First Amendment freedoms of people of faith, of Christians, and those who believe in traditional marriage defined as one man and one woman," says the attorney. "This shows the very disconcerting, authoritarian face of the homosexual activists, who are using these non-discrimination laws as weapons against Christians in the business world and Christians in their churches."
 
Lorence believes the Huguenins will win an appeal of the decision. But he warns this is how similar laws in 19 other states, and the proposed federal Employment Non-Discrimination Act, can be misused to silence biblical beliefs.
 
"There is a great threat to our religious liberties and our ability to speak out in favor of traditional marriage when these non-discrimination laws are interpreted in such a harsh way to censor Christians and others," he asserts.
 
Lorence said Americans do not surrender their freedoms of speech or religion just because they choose to open a business. He added that the Commission's decision is tantamount to the State of New Mexico forcing a vegetarian videographer to create a commercial for a butcher shop.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; Philosophy; US: New Mexico
KEYWORDS: adf; christian; christians; enda; homosexualagenda; lawsuit; lesbian; photography; workplace
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-94 next last

1 posted on 04/11/2008 8:26:39 AM PDT by NYer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Salvation; narses; SMEDLEYBUTLER; redhead; Notwithstanding; nickcarraway; Romulus; ...
Catholic Ping
Please freepmail me if you want on/off this list


2 posted on 04/11/2008 8:27:20 AM PDT by NYer ("Where the bishop is present, there is the Catholic Church" - Ignatius of Antioch)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Its really time for Americans to BACK their government.

This P.C. crap has GOT to be stopped while we still have a Country and a culture left to defend.


3 posted on 04/11/2008 8:28:31 AM PDT by ZULU (Non nobis, non nobis Domine, sed nomini tuo da gloriam. God, guts and guns made America great.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

If I were the photographers, I would take this joke of a ruling all the way to the Supreme Court, if need be. This is NOT Canada!


4 posted on 04/11/2008 8:30:21 AM PDT by Virginia Ridgerunner ("We must not forget that there is a war on and our troops are in the thick of it!"--Duncan Hunter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Under what authority does this commission have to levy fines towards an individual or private business? It has no authority equal to a court or a state regulatory agency.


5 posted on 04/11/2008 8:31:45 AM PDT by PRO 1 (POX on posters who's political bent causes them to refuse to be confused by the FACTS!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

I keep wating for the silent majority to lash back and instead may get President Obama.


6 posted on 04/11/2008 8:32:54 AM PDT by AU72
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

violation of conscience more than just “biblical belief” it makes it broader and allows all people to object on the issue of sexual behavior.


7 posted on 04/11/2008 8:33:16 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer
All this under worthless Senor Governor Bill Richardson's watch.
8 posted on 04/11/2008 8:35:38 AM PDT by OKIEDOC (Kalifornia, a red state wannabe. I don't take Ex Lax I just read the New York Times.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

This is an absolute travesty of social injustice. As a merchant, I reserve the right to refuse service to ANYONE and I don’t need a reason.
The fact that the state has empowered a ‘commission’ to adjudicate issues and assess fines, even if only for ‘costs’ is patently ridiculous (but widely done, I know).
The appeal should be interesting.


9 posted on 04/11/2008 8:41:47 AM PDT by PubliusMM (RKBA; a matter of fact, not opinion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

“Lorence said Americans do not surrender their freedoms of speech or religion just because they choose to open a business.”

Suppose you say your religion prevents you from serving blacks...perhaps you are a hold-over of the old Mormon religion, with its belief that black skin is a punishment for sin.

If you refuse to serve blacks, you WILL be prosecuted and convicted. Same with drugs, etc - your religious beliefs CAN conflict with anti-discrimination laws and result in punishment.


10 posted on 04/11/2008 8:44:57 AM PDT by Mr Rogers (Let's win Congress - the Presidency is lost!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PubliusMM

“I reserve the right to refuse service to ANYONE and I don’t need a reason.”

I don’t suggest you go to court with that approach. What you do in your home may be your business, as long as it doesn’t involve flush toilets or light bulbs. However, what you do in a public business is NOT just your business.

Anti-discrimination laws would have no teeth if your approach prevailed.


11 posted on 04/11/2008 8:47:52 AM PDT by Mr Rogers (Let's win Congress - the Presidency is lost!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Virginia Ridgerunner

Absolutely!


12 posted on 04/11/2008 8:48:03 AM PDT by GOP Poet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: NYer

I would appeal or burn my business and move out of state. I’d never pay it.


13 posted on 04/11/2008 8:48:51 AM PDT by Resolute Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

I have never heard of them, but it’s probably some very stupid commission the King set up before he grew a beard. From the same guy who gave a special award to a molester too...


14 posted on 04/11/2008 8:58:53 AM PDT by Santa Fe_Conservative (The RINOs think that they have won but we shall see who has the last laugh in '08...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer
On Wednesday, the Commission found the Christian couple guilty of discrimination under state anti-discrimination laws and ordered them to pay more than $6,000 in costs.

This is a blatant violation of First Amendment rights and a Federal lawsuit should be filed against the Commission.

15 posted on 04/11/2008 9:03:52 AM PDT by Polybius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Virginia Ridgerunner

I do a lot of photography work. I clearly state I DO NOT DO WEDDINGS. Of any kind. Boy, things are getting weird in this country. How long is He going to tarry?


16 posted on 04/11/2008 9:06:08 AM PDT by MrLee (Sha'alu Shalom Yerushalyim!! God bless Eretz Israel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Virginia Ridgerunner
If I were the photographers...

Jon and Elaine are fairly young (in their 20's) and were just married in the last few years. They are a little overwhelmed with the whole situation (which was a set up to establish a precedence).

17 posted on 04/11/2008 9:07:29 AM PDT by pby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mr Rogers

Yep. This is one of the onerous legacies of the federal government’s 1960s Civil Rights “you-will-serve-black customers-or-serve-federal-time” laws.


18 posted on 04/11/2008 9:07:38 AM PDT by Virginia Ridgerunner ("We must not forget that there is a war on and our troops are in the thick of it!"--Duncan Hunter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Polybius

Do you have First Amendment rights to discriminate in a public business?


19 posted on 04/11/2008 9:08:53 AM PDT by Mr Rogers (Let's win Congress - the Presidency is lost!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Mr Rogers
Suppose you say your religion prevents you from serving blacks...perhaps you are a hold-over of the old Mormon religion, with its belief that black skin is a punishment for sin.

Homosexuality is a behavior, not a race.

20 posted on 04/11/2008 9:11:13 AM PDT by Hacksaw (I support the San Fran tiger.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-94 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson