Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DoughtyOne
For instance, do you want someone to get off on a technicality because someone didn’t adhere to strict guidelines concering warrants?

That's a good point too.

I'll agree that there was most likely various child abuse issues going on in the compound. A good lawyer however will chew the crap out of the warrants and child abusers will walk because of the way this raid was handled.

11 posted on 04/09/2008 9:49:58 AM PDT by Domandred (McCain's 'R' is a typo that has never been corrected)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: Domandred

I’m not sure of that yet. Still, as a general rule, strict guidelines need to be adhered to. It protects the case and all parties concerned.

Many a good case has been thrown out due to improper procedures. In some instances the rulings have been absurd. Still, you don’t give a guy an opening. And you don’t betray the implied trust a victim has in the system, by soiling their case.


13 posted on 04/09/2008 9:55:54 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (McCain is rock solid on SCOTUS judicial appointments. He voted for Ginsberg, Kennedy and Souter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson