You say you were LDS once but many time I read your replies and wondered what you really understood in those days!
You make such leaps that we don't like the Bible when it to is another witness to the Lord Jesus Christ.
Seven care to add to this?
-----
By the same token, it's interesting that they deny the LDS practice polygamy, and here they are on all the polygamy threads defending it. The more they defend it, the more folks are reminded of their own polygamous history. If I were still mormon, I'd stay far away from polygamy in any form.
greyfoxx39 this is what is annoying you and many others like to speak for us or put words in our mouths.
I have said many times that plural marriage in many ways was a beautiful things.
Because of the caliber of souls who have entered the earth.
Personally I understood Plural marriage would not be with drawn until all of God purpose was completed.
These two ordinance plural marriage and the priesthood being open to all worthy males are most likely the two most dificult and misunderstood manifesto.
Many non members like to blame the LDS as though they had the say, when it was the Lord call and only the Lord knew when mission was completed.
I fine when one is sincere and study the scriptures as well as ponder that many times in the mind's eye will come pure understanding not only that but appreciation in thing work in the scheme of things.
God knows all our hearts and minds and when we as a people are ready to take on more of what he has in store for us.
Another witness? There is only ONE.
...there isn't any "leap" to quote your Article of Faith #8. You pick and choose from the Bible, while falling back on the "it isn't translated correctly" when the Bible conflicts with your Joseph Smith fallacies.
The Articles of Faith
of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints
Joseph Smith |
I have said many times that plural marriage in many ways was a beautiful things.
I doubt that is a wise comment on this particular thread, but you are defending polygamy, just as I stated: "By the same token, it's interesting that they deny the LDS practice polygamy, and here they are on all the polygamy threads defending it. The more they defend it, the more folks are reminded of their own polygamous history. If I were still mormon, I'd stay far away from polygamy in any form."
Many non members like to blame the LDS as though they had the say, when it was the Lord call and only the Lord knew when mission was completed.
Well, I guess we'll just have to take your word for THAT, won't we? The timing of the "Lord's call" certainly was convenient for allowing Utah to gain statehood, just as the revelation granting priesthood to blacks was convenient during the civil rights movement.
As I said, it's quite entertaining.