Skip to comments.
Windows 7 in the Next Year? ("or so"?)
Slashdot ^
 | 4/05/2008
Posted on 04/05/2008 9:46:25 AM PDT by sionnsar
Journal written by symbolset (646467) and posted by ScuttleMonkey
 on Saturday April 05, @07:21AM
 
from the also-duke-nukem-forever dept.
  
 
  
 Microsoft's efforts to get businesses to adopt Vista may come to a screeching halt now that Bill Gates has announced "Sometime in the next year or so we will have a new version", referring to 
Windows 7, the next expected version of the company's flagship desktop operating system.With a new version available soon, many organizations may decide to 
wait and see if they can avoid the pain of a Vista rollout altogether.
TOPICS: Computers/Internet
KEYWORDS: lowqualitycrap; microsoft; operatingsystems; vista; windows7; xp
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
 first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-112 next  last
    
1
posted on 
04/05/2008 9:46:25 AM PDT
by 
sionnsar
 
To: sionnsar
    Windows 7 won’t be worth having till 2 years after it’s release when service pack 2 is released.
 
To: sionnsar
    Impossible. I predict Vista is going to be around at least five years. It takes time to design and develop an operating system from the ground up. Windows Vista was extraordinarily complicated. There's no reason to believe Windows 7 can be brought to market in a year. 
  "Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus 
 
3
posted on 
04/05/2008 9:49:04 AM PDT
by 
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
 
To: sionnsar
    How is this different from Xp and Vista?? I run Xp, does this mean I have to load something else or does it replace those two?
/r/jane
 
4
posted on 
04/05/2008 9:50:03 AM PDT
by 
SkyDancer
("I Believe In Law Until It Interferes With Justice")
 
To: goldstategop
     It takes time to design and develop an operating system from the ground up. What makes you think they will do that?
 
5
posted on 
04/05/2008 9:51:56 AM PDT
by 
Izzy Dunne
(Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus.  Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
 
To: SkyDancer
    It would replace Vista. Its a question of just how fast emerging technologies and standards can be supported in a new OS. With tens of thousands of lines of code, its not easy to do that. With all the programming skill and know-how in the world, there will be bugs. 
  "Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus 
 
6
posted on 
04/05/2008 9:53:14 AM PDT
by 
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
 
To: sionnsar
    So basically Vista turned out to be Windows ME Part Deux.
 
7
posted on 
04/05/2008 9:54:49 AM PDT
by 
dfwgator
(11+7+15=3 Heismans)
 
To: Izzy Dunne
    Microsoft and the OEM makers have a symbiotic relationship. The only reason for building more powerful hardware is to run an OS that can take full advantage of it. Computer manufacturers know their sales are tied into Microsoft's flagship product, as most people buy the OS pre-installed on a new computer. 
  "Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus 
 
8
posted on 
04/05/2008 9:55:35 AM PDT
by 
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
 
To: goldstategop
    I will try to hang on to Xp as long as I can. BTW - my grandmom runs Windows 3.1 - she just writes letters and prints newsletters and labels. No Internet, doesn’t care for it - works fine for her .....
 
9
posted on 
04/05/2008 9:55:48 AM PDT
by 
SkyDancer
("I Believe In Law Until It Interferes With Justice")
 
To: goldstategop
    Windows 7 will be the last 32 bit Windows. Vista is so big, it really needs at least 2 GB of RAM, and a 32 bit processor can only address 4 GB directly.
 
To: goldstategop
     There's no reason to believe Windows 7 can be brought to market in a year.  They can do it if it's actually XP Service Pack 3 with a new splash screen. ;)
 
11
posted on 
04/05/2008 9:56:46 AM PDT
by 
Mr. Jeeves
("Wise men don't need to debate; men who need to debate are not wise." -- Tao Te Ching)
 
To: dfwgator
    Unlike Windows ME Vista actually works.
 
To: dfwgator
    With enough memory, its rock-solid. The Service Pack 1 should fix the bugs that came out in the original Vista rollout a year ago. 
  "Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus 
 
13
posted on 
04/05/2008 9:59:25 AM PDT
by 
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
 
To: Paleo Conservative
    Windows has gotten worse as a resource hog because so much is demanded of it. And yet its not capable of taking full advantage of the hardware's capacity. That's a challenge for Microsoft to solve. 
  "Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus 
 
14
posted on 
04/05/2008 10:01:22 AM PDT
by 
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
 
To: tokenatheist
    I had Windows ME running in a VMware virtual machine just fine.
 
15
posted on 
04/05/2008 10:01:27 AM PDT
by 
sionnsar
(trad-anglican.faithweb.com |Iran Azadi| 5yst3m 0wn3d - it's N0t Y0ur5 (SONY) | UN: Useless Nations)
 
To: sionnsar
    Vista: Worst. OS. Ever (well, since Windows ME!)
You lose Microsoft. Please try again...
 
16
posted on 
04/05/2008 10:05:24 AM PDT
by 
rockrr
(Global warming is to science what Islam is to religion)
 
To: Paleo Conservative
    Windows 7 wont be worth having till 2 years after its release when service pack 2 is released.It also won't be out next year, either. Bet. This is a strategic statement meant to get those refusing to upgrade from XP to hold out in hope of a better Windows in the near future rather than investigating other options. It'll work.
 
17
posted on 
04/05/2008 10:06:43 AM PDT
by 
MichiganMan
(Remember when Linkin Park wasn't on your mom's radio station?)
 
To: Izzy Dunne
    THey have been working on the basis of the next windows for awhile now, the biggest change will probably be the file system and resource allocation and utilization. THe hardest though has been building a new OS from the ground up that is still backwards compatible with past windows applications and hardware, which is one of the reasons why you have seen Windows continue to bloat as its different versions came out.
 
18
posted on 
04/05/2008 10:07:34 AM PDT
by 
aft_lizard
(born conservative...I chose to be a republican)
 
To: rockrr
    LOL, you have obviously never used it. LOL.
 
19
posted on 
04/05/2008 10:08:20 AM PDT
by 
aft_lizard
(born conservative...I chose to be a republican)
 
To: sionnsar
    The Vista rollout.. is it in a wheelchair already?..
 
20
posted on 
04/05/2008 10:08:20 AM PDT
by 
hosepipe
(CAUTION: This propaganda is laced with hyperbole....)
 
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
 first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-112 next  last
    Disclaimer:
    Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
    posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
    management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
    exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson