Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

B-1 bomber catches fire in Qatar
Gulf Times ^

Posted on 04/04/2008 5:15:10 PM PDT by maquiladora

A spokesperson for the US Air Force Central Public Affairs Office, South West Asia, said: “The US Air Force B-1, while taxiing after landing at Al Udeid Air Base, Qatar, was involved in a ground incident and caught fire at 21.10 local time on April 4.

“The crew evacuated the aircraft and is safe. The fire was contained. A board of inquiry has been appointed and will investigate the incident.”

At the time of going to print, officials in Qatar were not confirming the incident and the Air Force Public Affairs Office was looking into local reports that a number of explosions had been clearly heard in parts of Doha at the time the B-1 caught fire.

An earlier report from Al Jazeera English said the B-1 had crashed.

Reuters also reported the incident citing a US Defence official as saying: “A B-1 crashed. We are investigating. We don’t know how many people were on board or what mission the bomber was conducting.”

Meanwhile, AFP said another official, who was travelling with Defence Secretary Robert Gates in Oman, had denied that the bomber had crashed, claiming there was “an explosion aboard a B-1 bomber on the ground”.

However, this failed to explain local accounts in and around the surrounding area of the base.

One source told Gulf Times: “I heard repeated loud explosions and the ground beneath my feet was shaking. When I ran out of my accommodation to see what was going on, I could see smoke billowing into the sky.”

Another source said: “I was at home when I heard a deep rumble like thunder. A few seconds later I heard it again, and then one more time. When I went outside I could not see anything, but I did hear a number of emergency sirens. I assumed there had been some kind of major accident on the roads.”

Although there was no comment from the authorities, the roads leading to the air base were closed to traffic, indicating an incident of some sort had occurred.

Ambulances and police vehicles were also seen racing through Doha in the direction of the base.

Despite all the signs pointing to a major incident having taken place at Al Udeid, there was never any suggestion that there was a direct threat to the security of Qatar and no civilian flights were disrupted at Doha International Airport as a result of the incident.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: b1; b1bomber; qatar; usaf
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

1 posted on 04/04/2008 5:15:10 PM PDT by maquiladora
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jhpigott

Ping... Interesting.


2 posted on 04/04/2008 5:16:40 PM PDT by maquiladora
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maquiladora

No matter what the cause, that’s gonna be an expensive repair.......


3 posted on 04/04/2008 5:23:23 PM PDT by roaddog727 (BS does not get bridges built - the funk you see is the funk you do)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: roaddog727

“An earlier report from Al Jazeera English said the B-1 had crashed.”

Typical islamonazi wet dream.


4 posted on 04/04/2008 5:36:44 PM PDT by Levante
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: maquiladora

Must have hit a camel.


5 posted on 04/04/2008 5:38:01 PM PDT by boomop1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: maquiladora

Why do we need billion dollar aircraft to drop bombs on mud huts?


6 posted on 04/04/2008 5:54:44 PM PDT by Leisler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Leisler

You don’t think we might face a more capable enemy some day?


7 posted on 04/04/2008 6:00:49 PM PDT by Nachoman (My guns and my ammo, they comfort me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Leisler
"Why do we need billion dollar aircraft to drop bombs on mud huts?"

My guess is that we don't have enough obsolete, unsafe old air jalopies around to make it all the way to A'stan or Iraq.

8 posted on 04/04/2008 6:15:54 PM PDT by telebob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Nachoman

Like what, concrete huts?

Anyways, economy of force. One B-2 could put all Army and Marines in mine proof vehicles, but that isn’t sexy.


9 posted on 04/04/2008 6:17:13 PM PDT by Leisler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: telebob
How many decades has the Air Force tried to kill of the A-10s? But no, we got to use up, and make used up jalopies out of the B-2s, bombing mud huts, ditches and Japanese diesel pickups so that the Air Force bureaucracy can justify themselves. I can't wait for geosynchronous anti-camel laser platforms to be proposed.
10 posted on 04/04/2008 6:22:26 PM PDT by Leisler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Leisler

Hey, I’m no expert but I really doubt the military uses our most modern resources in a wasteful way. I’m sure some of the more knowledgable folks will chime in here shortly and explain it all to you.

Meanwhile, I just think you’re a crank...


11 posted on 04/04/2008 6:28:33 PM PDT by telebob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: telebob
Hey, I’m no expert but I really doubt the military uses our most modern resources in a wasteful way.

One of our 500 billion dollar federal bureacracies using resources in a wasteful way? I don't believe it!

12 posted on 04/04/2008 6:52:04 PM PDT by CGTRWK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: telebob
Although English isn't math, it can help approach reality. Like when Orwell said he didn't know what he thought until he wrote about it.

But anyway, what you meant to say is that you feel I am a crank. You have no objective facts to support your opinion being based upon rational thought.

13 posted on 04/04/2008 6:58:20 PM PDT by Leisler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Leisler; telebob
But anyway, what you meant to say is that you feel I am a crank. You have no objective facts to support your opinion being based upon rational thought.

Having read what you wrote, I think the objective facts support telebob's thinking.

14 posted on 04/04/2008 7:12:17 PM PDT by Steely Tom (Steely's First Law of the Main Stream Media: if it doesn't advance the agenda, it's not news.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom; Leisler; telebob

Having read what they wrote, I think anyone who thinks, much less writes, “but I really doubt the military uses our most modern resources in a wasteful way” IS a crank.


15 posted on 04/04/2008 7:42:46 PM PDT by jammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Leisler

“B1 Date Deployed: June 1985
Unit Cost: $283.1 million (fiscal 98 constant dollars)”

http://www.tinker-af.org/b-1.htm


16 posted on 04/04/2008 7:44:58 PM PDT by steve86 (Acerbic by nature, not nurtureā„¢)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: maquiladora

the official explanation thus far is kind of dodgy . . . makes it seem like this was something more than just a fire that broke out on the ground after the landing


17 posted on 04/04/2008 9:17:19 PM PDT by jhpigott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: maquiladora
Since our government is being very mum on this, let me be the first in the world to state that there is absolutely no evidence that this incident was a terrorist attack, none indeedy.

Leni

18 posted on 04/04/2008 9:20:53 PM PDT by MinuteGal (I Love My Country More Than I Dislike John McCain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom

I love to see bait taken. Thanks.


19 posted on 04/05/2008 4:30:55 AM PDT by Leisler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: steve86
I have two sisters that are teachers. They tell me that it costs something like $10k/yr per student to ‘educate’ them. I tell them it's more like $20K. They ask me how I get that. I say since half the kids are uneducated, they didn't meet the production quality goals. In the free market, they wouldn't of been paid for these poor products and would have to pass the costs on to those units that did.

Now if you think I believe the bombers are totally costed out at 300 million each, forgeheaboutit. That PART of that expense, at that moment in time, might well be correct. But the total costs of decades of expense, and total costs of off unit expense in other required expenses on the bomber could, easy, well push it over a billion.

Take the Marines Osprey. They have spent 18 billion. When the production bill comes in, the 18 billion will not be added to the aircraft unit cost. Nice. Who in private sector gets to cost out stuff like this but government?

20 posted on 04/05/2008 4:44:53 AM PDT by Leisler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson