Skip to comments.Hillary Clinton cannot let go of her dream
Posted on 04/03/2008 11:24:51 AM PDT by kingattax
Hillary Clintons chances of winning the Democratic presidential nomination are now anywhere from 5 per cent to 20 per cent. By rights she should be flat on her back, declared the loser by technical knockout. But not only is she standing; she is plunging ahead with a dogged ferocity.
In spite of Barack Obamas clear advantage in the popular vote and committed delegate tallies a mathematical dominance unlikely to be reversed even if he loses most of the remaining primary contests Mrs Clinton says she is being bullied by the big boys and vows to stay in the race until the Democratic convention.
Her relentless campaign has inspired reporters variously to compare her, with a mixture of admiration and horror, to the Terminator, a zombie, a cyborg and Anton Chigurh, the malevolent killer in No Country for Old Men. Even the coughing spasms that have seized her with alarming frequency these past few months have become an emblem of her fortitude. After she muscled her way through a foreign policy address, The New Yorker praised her ability to suppress the coughing through sheer will.
So what makes Mrs Clinton run, even as her win-at-all-cost strategy threatens her partys chances against John McCain, the Republican candidate? The answer lies partly in her innately combative nature, the quality that drew Bill Clinton to her when she was in my face from the start. She is equally famous for a preternatural focus and what one of her friends called her tunnel vision, along with a determination so unshakeable that her husband once told a visitor to the Oval Office: I might as well try to lift that desk up and throw it through the window as to change her mind. To reach her goals, she long ago learnt to embrace any tactic, however destructive. As her mother noted, Hillary does everything she has to do to get along and get ahead.
One of the most fascinating aspects of Mrs Clintons tall tale about dodging snipers at Tuzla airport in Bosnia was her unwillingness to acknowledge that she had described her supposed derring-do to at least four audiences. This was no slip of the tongue created by sleep deprivation, as she claimed. Her capacity for self-delusion is nothing new. During the 1992 campaign, when ABCs Sam Donaldson played audio tapes of Gennifer Flowers, her husbands lover, saying Goodbye darling and Mr Clinton replying Goodbye baby, her reaction was: Oh, thats not true. Didnt happen? Mr Donaldson pressed. Of course not, she replied.
For decades Mrs Clinton has thought of herself as a woman of destiny. Even as a little girl she would stand in a patch of sunlight pretending there were heavenly movie cameras watching my every move. She willingly served in her husbands shadow, in spite of the humiliations he inflicted on her with his womanising, on the assumption she would have her turn.
Back in 1974, Mr Clinton said she could be president one day and Linda Bloodworth-Thomason, one of their close friends, often remarked that when the Clintons were dead and gone, each of them is going to be buried next to a president of the United States. Mrs Clintons private sense that she was entitled to the presidency has expanded to the idea that the public owes her this ultimate prize as well.
She also benefits from a kind of political voodoo that makes her seem invincible, even to usually clear-eyed analysts who do the delegate maths over and over and keep finding she loses. The Clintons narrow escapes from political extinction haunt their memories like tribal drums in the night: from the suicide of their close friend Vincent Foster to an endless parade of scandals. In response they have built a fearsome political machine that attacks enemies and cuts loose friends they believe have wronged them.
A vital piece of this mythology is that, with the exception of Mr Clintons second race for governor in 1980, the Clintons do not lose in politics. Running for office is what the Billary tag team does; it is the glue that binds them together in her DNA as much as his, according to their old friend Tom Siebert. The duo have spent their adult lives perfecting the permanent campaign, mastering its dark arts even as they went about the everyday business of governing.
Mrs Clinton has made a point of saying: There are no do-overs in life. Yet she and her husband are seeking the ultimate do-over, another term or two in the Oval Office. Both are deeply invested in the sequel: Mrs Clinton is driven to fulfil her destiny, and Mr Clinton covets a chance to burnish his legacy and purify Clintonism.
But this time the dynamic is different, and therein lies the catch. To win in 2008, the Clintons have had to reverse their roles of Bill the candidate and Hillary his chief adviser and advocate. The demands of an unexpectedly tight campaign have brought out the worst in both of them, dragging their popularity ratings to new lows.
The virtuoso politician who feeds on the adulation of the rope-line suddenly finds himself playing an off-key second fiddle. The methodical, behind-the-scenes chief of staff finds herself centre stage, her flatlander voice betraying a harsh edge as she experiments with slogans and personalities.
Mrs Clintons political mettle had never been tested. Her opponent in her 2000 Senate race was a lightweight and she had token opposition in 2006. Her candidacy for president was based on the assumption that she would face a weak field and again coast to victory.
Perhaps what propels Mrs Clinton more than anything is a determination to prove she can be as good at politics as her husband, who she once said makes it look so easy. But months on the hustings have shown she lacks his legendary political talents.
In any other year, just being Hillary Clinton might have sufficed. But she is up against a man whose political gifts, ironically enough, are often compared with those of William Jefferson Clinton.
I’m awaiting the “crying moment”................
bubba is better at the fake crying photo-op
I just hope she keeps fighting....because if we are going to have a democrap as President, she is better than Obama.
If Obama is elected President, she’ll set up a shadow Presidency.
She will get the nomintion in the second round of voting at the convention (first round, no winner).
What happens next in the cities will not be pretty.
This article is BS...the only reason she is still in the race is for MONEY..the bitch is 14 million in the hole..if she withdraws...she eats it all and will never raise another dime...if she stays in, she has a chance to recover the money through donations...plain and simple.
And she made the trains run on time, too! Don't forget that! Or that weekend where she got 14 Holes-in-One golfing.
What’s the delegate count now?
Exactly. And even if its true that her chances are between 5% and 20%, since when is that a reason to give up? He can't win on elected delegates either, but they hardly ever mention that.
I think you may be overlooking the “tragic aircraft accident that took Barack Obama’s life just as he was about to become the first black presidential candidate for the Democrat party...”
She's doing it for O'bama's benefit.
“This article is BS...”
Says it all.
ROFL...yeah, the Ron Brown Airline.....
total delegates -- obama 1635 clinton 1503
So, she has you fooled as well.
That is what she is counting on.
For decades Mrs Clinton has thought of herself as a woman of destiny. Even as a little girl she would stand in a patch of sunlight pretending there were heavenly movie cameras watching my every move. She willingly served in her husbands shadow, in spite of the humiliations he inflicted on her with his womanising, on the assumption she would have her turn.And now, to lose it all. To lose big in PA (she will) and to go down to crashing, humiliating defeat.
Wow. What a prescription for revenge.
She will get her revenge. Against the upstart Hussein. In November. From behind the scenes.
Under sniper fire. You forgot that she was golfing under sniper fire.
In an ironic sort of way I actually feel bad for the Dimms. They’ve got to choose between being sexist or racist. Or in the case of the old school commies they talk the talk but truthfully don’t want a woman or “one of those types” (not my own words) anywhere near the white house.
Perfect example my grandmother and grandfather are both strong conservative catholics. One particular old woman in their church with a key chain counting down the days until Bush was out of office (supports abortion and the like but still pretends to be a catholic boggles the mind). My grandmother made the sarcastic remark that now we’d get Barrack Obama in the White House after this nice old lady was quite affronted and hasn’t spoken to them since.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.