Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Application filed for South Carolina nuclear power plant
PEI ^ | 31 March 2008

Posted on 04/02/2008 10:35:23 PM PDT by Red Steel

31 March 2008 -- South Carolina Electric & Gas Co. and Santee Cooper submitted an application with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission for a combined construction and operating license (COL), which, once approved, would authorize the companies to build and operate up to two new nuclear electric generating units at the utilities' existing V.C. Summer Nuclear Station site in Jenkinsville, S.C.

Filing the application does not commit the two utilities to build. Development of a COL application for the new nuclear facilities began in early 2006. The NRC will now n an approximate three-to-four-year review process and could issue the combined license in 2011.

Construction could begin shortly thereafter, subject to approval from the South Carolina Public Service Commission, with an in-service date as early as 2016 for the first unit. SCE&G and Santee Cooper estimate that base load generation will be needed for both utilities at this time.

SCE&G is a member of the NuStart Energy Development consortium. Formed in 2004 by 10 U.S. energy companies and two nuclear reactor vendors, NuStart allows member companies and the nuclear vendors to combine their industry experiences and expertise to contribute to the development of reference applications for reactor technologies, including the Westinghouse AP1000. Those applications contain standard licensing, engineering, technical, quality and safety information that future applicants can use to develop their own site-specific applications more efficiently.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; News/Current Events; US: South Carolina
KEYWORDS: energy; nuclear; nuclearpower
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last
To: ASOC

I would guess 90% of what I post comes from www.eia.doe.gov

They are the source of most of the data used in any articles or studies on oil. Even much from the American Petroleum Institute is sourced from them.


21 posted on 04/03/2008 10:18:01 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: thackney

thanks - I’ll put that on my favs list.


22 posted on 04/03/2008 10:24:10 AM PDT by ASOC (I know I don't look like much, but I raised a US Marine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: varyouga
Hydrogen burns back into water with no CO2 or pollution.

Sure, as long as you don't burn it in air. When nitrogen is present, you get nitrogen oxides in the exhaust.

23 posted on 04/03/2008 11:29:20 AM PDT by thulldud (Insanity: Electing John McCain again and expecting a different result.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

This is turning out to be a great week. 500 new oil wells planned for ND, now this. All we need now is some permits for a few new refineries.


24 posted on 04/03/2008 11:31:43 AM PDT by purpleraine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

The article does not state if the new reactors will use MOX fuel as has been proposed. Guess we will have to wait and see.


25 posted on 04/03/2008 1:46:17 PM PDT by Between the Lines (I am very cognizant of my fallibility, sinfulness, and other limitations.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thulldud
I'm thinking an H2 fuel cell or battery technology isn't too far off. People won't let go of the IC engine so H2 powered IC engines could be an intermediate step. You still get NOX but no worse than gasoline.

Powering those with nuclear or in the mean-time clean coal would drop dependence on oil.

We have to stop giving everything to the Islamists. All those buildings and man-made islands you see in Dubai are supposed be here in the USA.

26 posted on 04/03/2008 2:10:20 PM PDT by varyouga ("Rove is some mysterious God of politics & mind control" - DU 10-24-06)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: ASOC

Thanks for the facts update.


27 posted on 04/03/2008 4:02:35 PM PDT by Cobra64 (www.BulletBras.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Cobra64

Go to post #19 for a bit more of an update.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1995907/posts?page=19#19


28 posted on 04/03/2008 6:39:15 PM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Between the Lines
The article does not state if the new reactors will use MOX fuel as has been proposed. Guess we will have to wait and see.

Fuel assembly and pellet composition technology changes more rapidly than the big-metal structures, systems, and components of a nuclear plant. Predicting what kind of fuel will be loaded in 2016 is a dicey undertaking. The AP-1000 can be loaded with a variety of fuel, the type chosen for each cycle is largely a matter of economics. See slides 14 and 15 of this.
29 posted on 04/05/2008 10:21:11 AM PDT by sefarkas (Why vote Democrat Lite?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson