They will laugh at his demand for an apology. The only thing they will understand is if he files a lawsuit against them.
To: chessplayer; Fiddlstix; Defendingliberty; WL-law; Genesis defender; proud_yank; FrPR; ...
Global Warming Scam News & Views
|
The Best Global Warming Videos on the Internet
|
To: chessplayer
It is amazing what pathetic, completely brain-dead, dutiful sheep the drive-by media is.
From the Global Warmism Hoax, to utter worship of a crooked racist grifter like Obama, to their insane anti-Americanism.
Its mass hysteria psychosis.
3 posted on
03/28/2008 4:54:37 PM PDT by
FormerACLUmember
(When the past no longer illuminates the future, the spirit walks in darkness.)
To: chessplayer
4 posted on
03/28/2008 4:54:45 PM PDT by
xuberalles
("Barack Obama: Change Is A Dime Bag!" http://www.cafepress.com/titillatingtees.225246874)
To: chessplayer
It’s Fred Singer. Would help if you say that in the synopsis. Prof Singer may have the clearest thoughts in the world on the subject.
5 posted on
03/28/2008 4:57:22 PM PDT by
jimfree
(Freep and Ye shall find.)
To: chessplayer
7 posted on
03/28/2008 4:58:31 PM PDT by
lowbridge
("I can't wait to see what he stands for." - Susan Sarandon on her support of Barack Obama)
To: chessplayer
....."going to cost lives, and cause us lost species, and cost major economic damage around the world."Wow! Who would have thought a news report would have such dire consequences!
Of course, when the shoe is on the other foot suddenly it's OK.
.
8 posted on
03/28/2008 5:00:35 PM PDT by
R_Kangel
(`.`)
To: chessplayer
...""fraudulent nonsense" that is "going to cost lives, and cause us lost species, and cost major economic damage around the world." That's what this global warming nonsense will and is doing, especially in turd world countries where global warming nutcases are preventing the people in those countries from developing their infrastruture. They think that these people can make a living with an inverter, a second hand car battery and a solar panel and sell their "excess" electricity to their mud hut nieghbor so they can charge up their cell phone (as if they can afford one when they can't even afford food and eating utensils).
To: chessplayer
ABC's "World News" aired a disturbing global warming hit piece on Sunday that disrespectfully attacked an esteemed scientist and emeritus professor, referring to his work as "fraudulent nonsense" that is "going to cost lives, and cause us lost species, and cost major economic damage around the world."
I saw that report, or more correctly, that hit piece. But, the professor didn't do a good enough or adequate job of presenting or defending his side. I was expecting the professor to challenge the reporter on the science and on what the reporter actually knew himself. The professor should've challenged the reporter and asked the reporter to schedule a debate between himself and a proponent of global warming. There is nothing better than truth towards winning an argument. And I'm pretty sure that the professor and the real scientists have the better argument. But, the professor didn't represent himself too well. His main argument was that global warming was bunk. Fine, but, we need more.
17 posted on
03/28/2008 5:19:19 PM PDT by
adorno
To: chessplayer
20 posted on
03/28/2008 5:24:55 PM PDT by
maclay
(America First - The rest of the world comes second)
To: chessplayer
in an era of advertising profit catastrophe, it would seem mana from heavan to expose the ABC hit piece.
It would be a show UP of FNC or MSNBC or even (ugh) CNN.
but they would have to be journalists to expose the journalistic malpractice.
Of course he can sue for defamation since it was published.
28 posted on
03/28/2008 6:55:31 PM PDT by
longtermmemmory
(VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
To: chessplayer; OKSooner; honolulugal; Killing Time; Beowulf; Mr. Peabody; RW_Whacko; gruffwolf; ...
30 posted on
03/28/2008 7:12:37 PM PDT by
xcamel
(Forget the past and you're doomed to repeat it.)
To: chessplayer
The American main stream media is a criminal mafia
To: chessplayer
They will laugh at his demand for an apology. The only thing they will understand is if he files a lawsuit against them.That is correct.
To: chessplayer
Saw the piece - it was pretty disgraceful - the tease was to stay tuned for an upcoming story about a respected scientist who thought global warming was a scam - couldn’t believe ABC would be airing such a story, so I stayed tuned - at least half of the time was given to his critics, who were able to reply to the points he made, while the interview with him was a bunch of disconnected soundbites - typical defective MSM coverage......
To: chessplayer
4. Yours is supposed to be a news program not an opinion journal. ABC quit worrying about that pesky news stuff years ago. I wouldn't even give them the honor of being an opinion journal.
They are a naked propaganda machine.
38 posted on
03/29/2008 6:56:53 AM PDT by
Ditto
(Global Warming: The 21st Century's Snake Oil)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson