Availing myself of this right I say: I am for Barack Obama."
+
=
Posted on 03/26/2008 6:07:43 PM PDT by G8 Diplomat
“War is much too serious a thing to be left to military men,” in Talleyrand’s memorable words. In the same spirit, one could say: The American presidential elections are much too serious to be left to the Americans. The US is now the only superpower on earth. It will remain so for quite some time to come. The decisions of the president of the United States affect every human being on this planet.
Unfortunately, the citizens of the world have no part in these elections. But they may, at least, voice an opinion.
Availing myself of this right I say: I am for Barack Obama.
My friend Afif Safieh, now the chief PLO representative in the US, argues that there are two Americas: The America which exterminated the Native Americans and enslaved the blacks, the America of Hiroshima and McCarthy, and the other America, the America of the Declaration of Independence, of Lincoln, Wilson and Roosevelt.
In these terms, George Bush belongs to the first. Obama, his opposite in almost every respect, represents the second.
One can arrive at Obama by a process of elimination.
John McCain is a continuation of Bush. More attractive, probably more intelligent. But he is more of the same.
McCain will go on with the wars, and may start new ones. His economic agenda is the same “swinish capitalism” (Shimon Peres’ phrase), which has now brought disaster on the economy of the US, and the economy of all of us.
Eight years of Bush are enough for us. Thank you.
Hillary? True, there is something very positive in the fact that a woman is a potential candidate for the leadership of the most powerful country in the world. But it is not enough that it be a woman. It is also important which woman it is.
Almost all recent female leaders of countries have started wars: Margaret Thatcher started the Falklands War, Golda Meir bears the responsibility for the outbreak of the Yom Kippur War, Indira Gandhi made war on Pakistan, the current presidents of the Philippines and Sri Lanka are conducting internal wars.
The usual explanation is that in order to prevail in a man’s world, a woman politician has to prove that she is at least as tough as the men are. Hillary has already acted tough by voting for the disastrous Iraq war.
(Years ago, she came out for a Palestinian state. Since then, Hillary has not uttered another word in favor of the Palestinians.)
In the eight years of her husband Bill Clinton’s presidency nothing good for Israeli-Palestinian peace happened. In his “peace team” there were a lot of American Jews, but not a single American Arab. He was totally subservient to the Israel lobby. Israel doesn’t really need another term of Billary. If McCain is a continuation of Bush, Hillary is an extension of the entire present American political system, the present policy and the present routine. But the world needs another America.
The name of another America is Barack Hussein Obama.
The very fact that this person can be a serious contender for the presidency at all restores my faith in the possibilities inherent in America. After the excesses of Sen. Joe McCarthy there was President John Kennedy. After Bush there can be Obama. Only in America.
The great message of Obama is Obama himself. A person who has roots in three continents (and another half: Hawaii). A person whose education spans the wide world. A person who can see reality from the viewpoints of America, Africa and Asia. A person who is both black and white. A new kind of American, an American of the 21st century.
I am not as naïve as I sound. I realize that in his speeches there is more enthusiasm than content. We can’t know what he will do once elected president. President Obama may disappoint us. But I prefer to take a risk with a man like this than to know in advance what the two routine politicians, his competitors, will do.
Obama opposed the Iraq invasion from the start, when this took integrity and a lot of courage. Hillary voted for the war and changed her position only when public opinion had changed. McCain supports the war even now.
We in Israel know the huge difference between opposing a war in its first, decisive hour, and opposing it after a month, a year or five years.
On the other hand, the voters do not like a person who was right when they were wrong.
A personal note: As an optimist from birth, I like Obama’s optimism. I prefer a candidate who brings hope to one destroying hope. Optimism spurs to action, pessimism produces nothing but despair.
America needs a complete overhaul. Not just a wash, not just a wax job, not just a new coat of paint. It needs a new motor, a change of the entire leadership, a reappraisal of its position in the world, a change of values.
Can Obama do this? I hope so. I am not sure. But I am quite sure that the other two will not.
Here a Jew will pop the classic question: Is it good for the Jews?
The people who claim to speak for the American Jews, the “leaders” who were not elected by anyone, the chiefs of the fetid “organizations”, are conducting a dirty campaign of defamation and sly hints against him. If his middle name is Hussein and he is black, he must be an “Arab-lover”. Also, he did not distance himself enough from the anti-Semite Louis Farakhan.
The same “leaders” are in bed with the most loathsome racists in the US, obscurantist fundamentalists and blood-stained neocons. But most American Jews know that their place is not there. The unholy alliance with those types will inevitably come home to roost. The Jews have to be where they have always been: In the progressive camp, striving for equality and the separation between state and religion.
It must be asked: Is it good for Israel?
All three candidates have groveled at the feet of AIPAC. The fawning of all three before the Israeli leadership is disgusting. They all show a lack of integrity. But I know that they have no choice. That’s how it is in the USA.
In spite of this, Obama succeeded in getting out one courageous sentence. Speaking before a mainly Jewish audience in Cleveland, he said: “There is a strain within the pro-Israel community that says unless you adopt an unwavering pro-Likud approach to Israel, you’re anti-Israel and that can’t be the measure of our friendship with Israel.”
I hope that the American Barack (blessed, in Arabic), if elected, will not turn into a replica of the Israeli Barak (lightning, in Hebrew).
Real friendship means: When you see that your friend is drunk, you don’t encourage him to drive. You offer to take him home. I am longing for an American president who will have the courage and the honesty to tell our leaders: Dear friends, you are drunk with power! You are speeding along a highway that leads to an abyss!
Perhaps Barack Obama will be such a friend. This would be a blessing for us, too.
I don't even know where to begin with my rant, so I might as well just not say anything. But I will say this: what room does this guy, presumable a Saudi citizen if he writes for Arab News, have to complain about how "evil" America is when his country has been funding and exporting terrorism since its foundation? STFU Uri!
“But it is not enough that it be a woman. It is also important which woman it is.”
As a woman, I’ll drink to that! Anyone but that particular beotch at the helm!
Let me know when we run out of rich white guys to be President, would ya, Uri? Not much will change until that happens. ;)
Uri is an Israeli & an ibn kalb.
Another Arab endorsement for Obama. Isn’t that special.
An Arab ass talking about the acceptability of a female president is ironic indeed.
Don't they have their own country and shouldn't they care more about that?
Or maybe they're upset because they can't vote in their own country.
Well c'mon over; the borders are open.
He’s an Israeli actually; could be an Israeli Arab but his name doesn’t sound like an Arab name. But either way—another a$$hole endoresment for Obama. Isn’t that special.
I just laughed.
Here’s a good palce to start:
His naivete and sophomoric glint show best here:
“Almost all recent female leaders of countries have started wars: Margaret Thatcher started the Falklands War, Golda Meir bears the responsibility for the outbreak of the Yom Kippur War, Indira Gandhi made war on Pakistan, the current presidents of the Philippines and Sri Lanka are conducting internal wars.”
He actually believes peace will come if leaders just stop commencing wars for no reason.
What is an ibn kalb?
“Unfortunately, the citizens of the world have no part in these elections.”
I thank God every day for this.....
Means “son of a dog”...an insult to Muslims and Middle Easterners in general because they have an aversion to dogs.
True, but it’s not like a good many of our citizens are much better informed....this guy sounds just like an American liberal.
Son of a dog. Sounds more serious in Arabic because of a regional distate for dogs.
+
=
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.