The original headline reads: "Breaking: Supreme Court rules against illegal alien Death Row murderer (and stupid Bush administration), upholds US sovereignty" (cropped to comply with FR's headline length rules).
Found this on Michelle Malkin's site. Did not see it posted here after a search.
1 posted on
03/25/2008 9:43:12 AM PDT by
indcons
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
To: indcons
"The decision, aside from its rebuff of presidential power, also treats the World Court ruling itself as not binding on U.S. states, when it contradicts those states’ criminal procedure rules."
2 posted on
03/25/2008 9:44:21 AM PDT by
indcons
To: indcons
I find it hard to swallow that we should allow access to consular officials by those that are in our country illegally. That alone should terminate any rights they have as decreed by “international” law.
3 posted on
03/25/2008 9:48:20 AM PDT by
VeniVidiVici
(Benedict Arnold was against the Terrorist Surveillance Program)
To: indcons
Excellent news.
[You can bet the phone lines between the Oval Office and Mexico City are burning.]
4 posted on
03/25/2008 9:49:16 AM PDT by
TomGuy
To: AuntB; bcsco; Travis McGee; 2ndDivisionVet
5 posted on
03/25/2008 9:50:30 AM PDT by
indcons
To: indcons
This is the best part:
Chief Justice John Roberts ... said the international court decision cannot be forced upon the states.
6 posted on
03/25/2008 9:51:14 AM PDT by
TomGuy
To: indcons
The president, was in the unusual in his usual "bent over" position was obviouslyand pandering to his good buds south of the border, going so far as to side with a murderous illegal alien thug, and against his own government and his home state Hey Jorge, just how low will you stoop in your efforts towards open borders and shamnesty?
9 posted on
03/25/2008 9:55:33 AM PDT by
Conservative Vermont Vet
(One of ONLY 37 Conservatives in the People's Republic of Vermont. Socialists and Progressives All)
To: indcons
It has been baffling to watch President Bush try to figure out which nation’s citizens elected him to be their president. He has sided with Mexican citizens over our own countless times.
Here a Mexican citizen had killed a Citizen of the United States, and Bush still defended him. I guess I shouldn’t be surprised, he has backed illegal aliens as they declared open season on U.S. Citizens’s jobs and lives.
11 posted on
03/25/2008 10:01:13 AM PDT by
DoughtyOne
(Some think McCain should pick his No 2 now. I thought the nominee was No 2. And that No 1s me off!)
To: indcons; Czar; Borax Queen
The president may not establish binding rules of decision that pre-empt contrary state law, Roberts said. BTTT!!
13 posted on
03/25/2008 10:02:24 AM PDT by
nicmarlo
To: indcons
Who were three “yes” votes?
14 posted on
03/25/2008 10:04:25 AM PDT by
Notwithstanding
("You are either with America in our time of need or you are not" - W? No, 'twas Sen. Hillary 9/12/01)
To: indcons
Supreme Court SMACKDOWN of the New World Order!
I love it!!
(I wonder if President Jorge W. is having a few regrets right now about nominating John Roberts.)
To: indcons
by the world courts rulings in such cases The world court aye?
20 posted on
03/25/2008 10:09:37 AM PDT by
sit-rep
To: indcons
We really need a statement of American sovereignty. If foreign governments want our nationals to respect their laws, they have to accord the same to ours when their nationals are here. Foreigners are not given privileged status by virtue of being in America.
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus
21 posted on
03/25/2008 10:10:41 AM PDT by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
To: indcons
15 years after the murders, this vato is still breathing.
Que horible!
26 posted on
03/25/2008 10:15:01 AM PDT by
Tex Pete
To: indcons
Was he here on a temporary visa, or an illegal immigrant visa? I’d say anything goes in the latter case.
Do they barbecue them in Texas? If so, someone might ask the Mexican Consulate what sauce is most appropriate.
31 posted on
03/25/2008 10:26:44 AM PDT by
USMCPOP
(Father of LCpl. Karl Linn, KIA 1/26/2005 Al Haqlaniyah, Iraq)
To: indcons
Bush was in the unusual position of siding with...a Mexican citizen...What's unusual about that? Bush has sided with Mexico and Mexican citizens over US citizens and laws for years.
34 posted on
03/25/2008 10:39:34 AM PDT by
FreePaul
To: indcons
someone please help me out here. where in the US constitution is a president given explicit powers to order any court, state or federal, to do anything ?
35 posted on
03/25/2008 10:44:23 AM PDT by
kingattax
(99 % of liberals give the rest a bad name)
To: indcons
36 posted on
03/25/2008 10:46:10 AM PDT by
trisham
(Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
To: indcons
Bush was in the unusual position of siding with death row prisoner Jose Ernesto Medellin, a Mexican citizen Don't know what they're talking about. Sounds like his usual position to me! On the side of the Mexicans instead of the Americans!
38 posted on
03/25/2008 10:51:16 AM PDT by
HeartlandOfAmerica
(Don't blame me - I voted for Fred and am STILL a FredHead!)
To: indcons
"Chief Justice John Roberts, writing for the majority, disagreed. Roberts said the international court decision cannot be forced upon the states.
The president may not establish binding rules of decision that pre-empt contrary state law, Roberts said." Way to go, Chief Justice John Roberts! There is no doubt how Justice Saundra "International Law Trumps the Constitution" Day O'Connor would have ruled.
42 posted on
03/25/2008 10:57:46 AM PDT by
Jim Robinson
(Our God-given unalienable rights are not open to debate, negotiation or compromise!)
To: indcons
Roberts said the international court decision cannot be forced upon the states. The president may not establish binding rules of decision that pre-empt contrary state law, Roberts said. Whoo Hoo! The Constitution upheld!
44 posted on
03/25/2008 11:05:02 AM PDT by
GVnana
("They're still analyzing the first guy. What do I have to worry about?" - GWB)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson