Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

The original headline reads: "Breaking: Supreme Court rules against illegal alien Death Row murderer (and stupid Bush administration), upholds US sovereignty" (cropped to comply with FR's headline length rules).

Found this on Michelle Malkin's site. Did not see it posted here after a search.

1 posted on 03/25/2008 9:43:12 AM PDT by indcons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last
To: indcons
"The decision, aside from its rebuff of presidential power, also treats the World Court ruling itself as not binding on U.S. states, when it contradicts those states’ criminal procedure rules."
2 posted on 03/25/2008 9:44:21 AM PDT by indcons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: indcons

I find it hard to swallow that we should allow access to consular officials by those that are in our country illegally. That alone should terminate any rights they have as decreed by “international” law.


3 posted on 03/25/2008 9:48:20 AM PDT by VeniVidiVici (Benedict Arnold was against the Terrorist Surveillance Program)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: indcons

Excellent news.

[You can bet the phone lines between the Oval Office and Mexico City are burning.]


4 posted on 03/25/2008 9:49:16 AM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AuntB; bcsco; Travis McGee; 2ndDivisionVet

Ping


5 posted on 03/25/2008 9:50:30 AM PDT by indcons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: indcons
This is the best part:

Chief Justice John Roberts ... said

the international court decision cannot be forced upon the states.


6 posted on 03/25/2008 9:51:14 AM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: indcons
The president, was in the unusual in his usual "bent over" position was obviouslyand pandering to his good buds south of the border, going so far as to side with a murderous illegal alien thug, and against his own government and his home state

Hey Jorge, just how low will you stoop in your efforts towards open borders and shamnesty?

9 posted on 03/25/2008 9:55:33 AM PDT by Conservative Vermont Vet (One of ONLY 37 Conservatives in the People's Republic of Vermont. Socialists and Progressives All)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: indcons

It has been baffling to watch President Bush try to figure out which nation’s citizens elected him to be their president. He has sided with Mexican citizens over our own countless times.

Here a Mexican citizen had killed a Citizen of the United States, and Bush still defended him. I guess I shouldn’t be surprised, he has backed illegal aliens as they declared open season on U.S. Citizens’s jobs and lives.


11 posted on 03/25/2008 10:01:13 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (Some think McCain should pick his No 2 now. I thought the nominee was No 2. And that No 1s me off!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: indcons; Czar; Borax Queen
The president may not “establish binding rules of decision that pre-empt contrary state law,” Roberts said.

BTTT!!

13 posted on 03/25/2008 10:02:24 AM PDT by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: indcons

Who were three “yes” votes?


14 posted on 03/25/2008 10:04:25 AM PDT by Notwithstanding ("You are either with America in our time of need or you are not" - W? No, 'twas Sen. Hillary 9/12/01)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: indcons

Supreme Court SMACKDOWN of the New World Order!

I love it!!

(I wonder if President Jorge W. is having a few regrets right now about nominating John Roberts.)


16 posted on 03/25/2008 10:06:42 AM PDT by Deo volente
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: indcons
by the world court’s rulings in such cases

The world court aye?

20 posted on 03/25/2008 10:09:37 AM PDT by sit-rep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: indcons
We really need a statement of American sovereignty. If foreign governments want our nationals to respect their laws, they have to accord the same to ours when their nationals are here. Foreigners are not given privileged status by virtue of being in America.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

21 posted on 03/25/2008 10:10:41 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: indcons

15 years after the murders, this vato is still breathing.

Que horible!


26 posted on 03/25/2008 10:15:01 AM PDT by Tex Pete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: indcons

Was he here on a temporary visa, or an illegal immigrant visa? I’d say anything goes in the latter case.

Do they barbecue them in Texas? If so, someone might ask the Mexican Consulate what sauce is most appropriate.


31 posted on 03/25/2008 10:26:44 AM PDT by USMCPOP (Father of LCpl. Karl Linn, KIA 1/26/2005 Al Haqlaniyah, Iraq)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: indcons
Bush was in the unusual position of siding with...a Mexican citizen...

What's unusual about that? Bush has sided with Mexico and Mexican citizens over US citizens and laws for years.

34 posted on 03/25/2008 10:39:34 AM PDT by FreePaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: indcons

someone please help me out here. where in the US constitution is a president given explicit powers to order any court, state or federal, to do anything ?


35 posted on 03/25/2008 10:44:23 AM PDT by kingattax (99 % of liberals give the rest a bad name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: indcons

Good news!


36 posted on 03/25/2008 10:46:10 AM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: indcons
Bush was in the unusual position of siding with death row prisoner Jose Ernesto Medellin, a Mexican citizen

Don't know what they're talking about. Sounds like his usual position to me! On the side of the Mexicans instead of the Americans!

38 posted on 03/25/2008 10:51:16 AM PDT by HeartlandOfAmerica (Don't blame me - I voted for Fred and am STILL a FredHead!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: indcons
"Chief Justice John Roberts, writing for the majority, disagreed. Roberts said the international court decision cannot be forced upon the states.

The president may not “establish binding rules of decision that pre-empt contrary state law,” Roberts said."

Way to go, Chief Justice John Roberts! There is no doubt how Justice Saundra "International Law Trumps the Constitution" Day O'Connor would have ruled.

42 posted on 03/25/2008 10:57:46 AM PDT by Jim Robinson (Our God-given unalienable rights are not open to debate, negotiation or compromise!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: indcons
Roberts said the international court decision cannot be forced upon the states. The president may not “establish binding rules of decision that pre-empt contrary state law,” Roberts said.

Whoo Hoo! The Constitution upheld!

44 posted on 03/25/2008 11:05:02 AM PDT by GVnana ("They're still analyzing the first guy. What do I have to worry about?" - GWB)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson