Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

The Clintons were probably the worst fate to ever befall the rats. They lost the senate, house and governorships and state legislatures across the country under Bill Clinton. Also if she couldn't care less about her party, imagine what she'd do with this country if she [shudder] should become president.
1 posted on 03/25/2008 8:48:48 AM PDT by CondiRice08
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: CondiRice08

THE DAMAGE DONE TO THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY by Bill Clinton was the worst experienced under any incumbent president since Grover Cleveland. Here are some of the stats:

- GOP seats gained in House after Clinton became president: 48

- GOP seats gained in Senate after Clinton became president: 8

- GOP governorships gained after Clinton became president: 11

- GOP state legislative seats gained since Clinton became president: 1,254 as of 1998

- State legislatures taken over by GOP after Clinton became president: 9

- Democrat officeholders who became Republicans since Clinton became president: 439 as of 1998

- Republican officeholders who became Democrats: 3


2 posted on 03/25/2008 8:53:15 AM PDT by digger48 (http://prorev.com/legacy.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CondiRice08

If Obama is the nominee, clinton will sabotage him. No way she waits 8 years to run again.


3 posted on 03/25/2008 8:53:58 AM PDT by icwhatudo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CondiRice08
Sometimes I think the Clinton's are like Anakin Skywalker -- he became Darth Vader and worked to promote the dark side for many years, but in the end, it was only through his actions that the Sith Lord was destroyed.

The Clintons are bad people. Perhaps in the end it is only they who will remove the scales from the eyes of America and help the sheeple to turn away from Liberal Fascism.

4 posted on 03/25/2008 8:55:53 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CondiRice08
I was rooting for hillary to be the nominee. I still believe that our liberal McCain would beat her, but McCain actually leads Obama by greater margins in PA and Ohio than he does hillary.
Anyway the economy will be ok on election day. Gas prices will fall a bit, and the tax rebate checks will have a short term stimulus on the economy. And we're winning in Iraq. Obama’s past is catching up with him big time, he's a fading rock star hoping to cut it on the oldies circuit.
And a McCain win is the only way hillary can ever hope to be president. So she'll definitely sabotage Obama’s campaign.
6 posted on 03/25/2008 8:57:59 AM PDT by mainerforglobalwarming
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CondiRice08
Her continued campaign is significantly damaging Obama's general election prospects

The sense of entitlement among Obama supporters is breathtaking. The man is so insubstantial it is laughable.

10 posted on 03/25/2008 9:06:20 AM PDT by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CondiRice08

Is this guy Catholic?

11 posted on 03/25/2008 9:08:25 AM PDT by xp38
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CondiRice08
I agree with the notion that 2008 represents Hillary Clinton's only real chance to win the White House. This is an ideal election year for a Democratic candidate to win (mainly because the current GOP administration is on its last legs and because John McCain is a miserable candidate), and history doesn't bode well for candidates on the national stage who lose during previous primary or general elections (note how thoroughly Walter Mondale was trounced in 1984 after losing on the Carter ticket in 1980, and how Joe Lieberman was generating Sharpton-like numbers in the 2004 Democratic primaries after losing as Gore's running mate in 2000).

For some reason I find myself wondering if the stars are lining up perfectly for Mitt Romney to be the ideal presidential candidate in 2012 -- regardless of who wins this year.

12 posted on 03/25/2008 9:10:36 AM PDT by Alberta's Child (I'm out on the outskirts of nowhere . . . with ghosts on my trail, chasing me there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CondiRice08
Clinton is acting as if she doesn't care about the Democratic Party's interests at all, except insofar as they coincide with her own

Damn, these liberals learn slowly.

15 posted on 03/25/2008 9:13:20 AM PDT by T. Buzzard Trueblood ("a wee bit silly." -Lord Trimble on Hillary Clinton's claim of foreign policy "experience".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CondiRice08
The Clintons were probably the worst fate to ever befall the rats.

And still better than Obama. Says a lot about the state of the Party.

In addition, dems now are into conspiracy theories big time... with Clintons deemed omnipotent no less!
16 posted on 03/25/2008 9:24:58 AM PDT by alecqss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CondiRice08
Does Clinton want Obama to lose?

Well, of course. . .she's running against him.

Oh, the general election? Um, well since Obamie hasn't gotten the nomination yet, that question seems a bit premature.

21 posted on 03/25/2008 10:08:52 AM PDT by MEGoody (Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson