Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: endthematrix

Do not forget that the UN was the forum used to diffuse quite a number of Cold War tensions. (like the Cuban missile crisis).

The UN may have had significant failures in peacekeeping (i.e Rwanda) but there have been successes (e.g. Liberia, East Timor). What other platform would enable Indian troops to be involved in peacekeeping operations in Sierra Leone?

The UNDP (UN development programme) may not have much use for citizens of Western Europe and America, but it has done a great deal in the developing world.

The UN was the vehicle through which sanctions were imposed on South Africa, Zimbabwe and Burma.

Our relationship with the world is not limited to China, Western Europe and the Middle East. We cannot fulfil our foreign policy objectives for the rest of the World apart from the UN. It will be a cold day in hell before American troops get involved in any intervention in Africa. So we need the UN there.

Now I may not sound very popular in conservative circles but I don’t care.


26 posted on 03/22/2008 1:49:58 AM PDT by KingJaja
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: KingJaja

The only problem I have with the US exiting the UN, is that “global tests” now rest with the “international community” that remain. Newbie, I don’t know what to say. The UN is contrary to what our Founders envisioned for our country. Utopian internationalist dreamers got there wish.


27 posted on 03/22/2008 2:15:44 AM PDT by endthematrix (He was shouting 'Allah!' but I didn't hear that. It just sounded like a lot of crap to me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson