Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

NPR even admits, halfheartedly that the Al Gores of the world still have much to learn.
1 posted on 03/19/2008 7:44:52 AM PDT by milwguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last
To: milwguy

If the facts don’t fit the theory, throw the facts overboard. That’s the Goracle Way.


2 posted on 03/19/2008 7:46:23 AM PDT by hsalaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: milwguy

And they call the skeptics flat earthers!


3 posted on 03/19/2008 7:48:17 AM PDT by AU72
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: milwguy
.... These diving instruments suggest that the oceans have not warmed up at all over the past four or five years.....

Hmmmmmm, a very inconvenient truth! Al Gore will be pi$$ed.

4 posted on 03/19/2008 7:48:42 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: milwguy

Think about the absurdity of the phrase “global warming’s missing heat”


5 posted on 03/19/2008 7:48:54 AM PDT by Enchante (Eliot Spitzer, can your daughters be "high class" coke-whores for some Democrat friends?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: milwguy
Who is it that is in denial?
6 posted on 03/19/2008 7:49:16 AM PDT by BallyBill (Serial Hit-N-Run poster)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: milwguy
Or it could mean scientists aren't quite understanding what their robots are telling them.

More likely, the robots aren't telling them what they want to hear.

7 posted on 03/19/2008 7:49:24 AM PDT by Fresh Wind (Vaclav Klaus on global warming skeptics: "a whip of political correctness strangles their voice")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: milwguy
I heard this story. They layed out two possible alternatives;
1. Global arming is taking a break
2. We don't understand the data.

Not mentioned as the possibility that we are going into a period of global cooling. That is because nothing in their theology could account for human generated global cooling.

My son was in the car and I pointed out the blatant bias in this piece so at least it was a teaching moment.

8 posted on 03/19/2008 7:50:47 AM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: milwguy

Their endless quest to prove that Al Gore should have been President in 2000 has cost the Libs an Oscar, a Nobel and whatever sanity they may have had.


10 posted on 03/19/2008 7:52:41 AM PDT by JennysCool (They all say they want change, but they’re really after folding money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: milwguy
fool-aid250
GREEN Artificial Concensus. Unhinged Eco-Think Mix-Add Junk Science. Makes You Believe Al Gore. Net Wt. 0.0oz.

11 posted on 03/19/2008 7:53:09 AM PDT by Conservative Vermont Vet (One of ONLY 37 Conservatives in the People's Republic of Vermont. Socialists and Progressives All)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: milwguy
poor NPR. Scratching their collective(ist) heads in confusion, fear and doubt.

Woe-is-them.


12 posted on 03/19/2008 7:53:22 AM PDT by Vaquero (" an armed society is a polite society" Heinlein "MOLON LABE!" Leonidas of Sparta)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: milwguy
>>
... That could mean global warming has taken a breather. Or it could mean scientists aren't quite understanding what their robots are telling them...
<<

Maybe the answer lies in the quiet sun. As of this very moment, still very, very few sunspots in this current cycle. Climate science has drunk the AGW KoolAid and is not interested in any other climate models. Well, there is another climate model, one where the correlation between climate swings and solar activity is very high.

Indeed, climate science loves their models going forward, but few scientists seem interested in back-testing them, especially to test them against the 1800’s when snow in July caused such massive crop failures that many died from famine.

This corresponded to a sunspot cycle that lacked sunspots, a period that was named the Maunder Minimum. So far, this current cycle seems to mimic the paucity of sunspots during that time. If we have a similar paucity, we can expect similar weather disasters.

see:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Year_Without_a_Summer

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maunder_minimum

http://sohowww.nascom.nasa.gov/data/realtime/mdi_igr/512/

14 posted on 03/19/2008 7:56:49 AM PDT by theBuckwheat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: milwguy

2006: The term was “Global Warming”
2007: The term was “Climate Change”
2008: The term is “Climate Inactivity”

Climate Inactivity is caused by man! Factories and SUVs are preventing the climate from changing naturally!


15 posted on 03/19/2008 7:57:12 AM PDT by kidd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: milwguy

I love the line towards the bottom that tells us that maybe some of the warmer temperature has gone deeper into the water. That is soooooo funny!

These guys really don’t have a clue!


16 posted on 03/19/2008 8:00:05 AM PDT by landerwy (Life, Liberty and the pursuit of happiness!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: milwguy

so the calculations about continued growth in heat due to co2, have, er taken a break...

BAWHAHHA...yep cos maths works that way...when things dont total correctly, just say one column is on vacation...


20 posted on 03/19/2008 8:05:01 AM PDT by Irishguy (How do ya LIKE THOSE APPLES!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: milwguy

Quite right, ole chum. A nip here, a tuck there and we’ll have this whole thing sorted out in time to meet over an expense account lunch.
Being an expert is really great, don’t you think?


21 posted on 03/19/2008 8:05:02 AM PDT by count-your-change (you don't have to be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sauropod

read


23 posted on 03/19/2008 8:06:47 AM PDT by sauropod (“Forgive me Gore, for I have emitted.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: enough_idiocy; rdl6989; TenthAmendmentChampion; Horusra; Normandy; Delacon; CygnusXI; Fiddlstix; ...
 


Global Warming Scam News & Views

25 posted on 03/19/2008 8:13:46 AM PDT by steelyourfaith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: milwguy

Put the robot AlGore down there in cement shoes to see if he can figure it out!


27 posted on 03/19/2008 8:17:13 AM PDT by AngelesCrestHighway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: milwguy
That could mean global warming has taken a breather.

Not possible. Its there. It has to be there. Its like Big Foot except you have to purchase outrages insurance (carbon credits) to protect yourself from it.

Seriously, the response to this is very predictable. They will simply say that we are going through a natural cooling cycle, which has masked the GW and when we emerge from that natural cooling cycle, we are all going to burst into flames. They will see this as "one last chance" provided by God to do what is right."

Thus, the lack of an increase in temperatures proves the existence of GW, because temperatures should be falling!

28 posted on 03/19/2008 8:19:06 AM PDT by SampleMan (We are a free and industrious people, socialist nannies do not become us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: milwguy
Isn't it amazing to watch them struggle for explanations, admit they don't know enough, yet somehow dire global warming MUST be happening. LOL
29 posted on 03/19/2008 8:19:42 AM PDT by Names Ash Housewares
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson