Posted on 03/19/2008 6:55:07 AM PDT by gridlock
Barack Obama has run a campaign based on a simple premise: that words of unity and hope matter to America. Now he has been forced by his charismatic, angry pastor to argue that words of hatred and division don't really matter as much as we thought.
(snip)
The problem with Obama's argument is that Wright is not a symbol of the strengths and weaknesses of African Americans. He is a political extremist, holding views that are shocking to many Americans who wonder how any presidential candidate could be so closely associated with an adviser who refers to the "U.S. of KKK-A" and urges God to "damn" our country.
(snip)
Take an issue that Obama did not specifically confront yesterday. In a 2003 sermon, Wright claimed, "The government lied about inventing the HIV virus as a means of genocide against people of color."
This accusation does not make Wright, as Obama would have it, an "occasionally fierce critic of American domestic and foreign policy." It makes Wright a dangerous man. He has casually accused America of one of the most monstrous crimes in history, perpetrated by a conspiracy of medical Mengeles. If Wright believes what he said, he should urge the overthrow of the U.S. government, which he views as guilty of unspeakable evil. If I believed Wright were correct, I would join him in that cause.
(snip>
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...
And hangs out with ducks ...
We all know what "birds of a feather" do ...
As an Avian-American, I speak with some authority on the topic.
Obama violated “the bargain” -
He would not push past grievances in our faces, and we would not see him as threatening.
By not repudiating Wright and throwing his white grandmother under the bus, he’s keeping the grievances alive and violating the bargain.
I still can’t believe how he threw his grandmother under the bus. That’s pretty damn slimy.
I guess they couldn’t hold this one over for Saturday. Wierd, huh?
The trouble is that, of the three people who actually have a chance to be the next President, the only one who's part of the 299,995,000 (i.e. Her Heinous) is utterly unacceptable for other reasons.
“Barack Obama is not a man who hates — but he chose to walk with a man who does.”
And how do we know he is not a man of hate ? Well, he just spent the last 20 years in a mad church who endorsed islam, antiamericanism, racism and Farrakhan’s antisemitism.
Liberals are fascist. Had Obama been the member of a neonazi party, they wouldn’t complain.
Obama is by far the most dangerous person that has ever been in a presidential election.
Gosh, when he achieved the power to impose his racism on the everyone else,
would it then be possible for blacks to be racist?
According to the left, it’s impossible for blacks to be racist because blacks lack the power to impose their racism.
Yep, and the panel that Chrissy Matthews had loved it to. So did the New York Times. Comparison to JFK, MLK, Lincoln filled the airwaves and print media. I think the True Believers in Obama were brought to tears, but for most folks is was boring and lame just the same old same old.
If he will throw his own Grandmother under the bus, how much worse will he treat you, for whom he has no particular love or loyalty?
I think it’s as likely as not that Obama is a man who hates, though I’ll never learn what he really believes from listening to his speeches. He was spiritually mentored by a man who hates for 20 years-that says something. How much, it’s hard to know. That’s one thing amongst others that’s dangerous about Obama-he has covered himslef in a blinding light of empty but ear-tickling rhetoric that never lets you see the man as he is or what he really believes, his core concrete principles and motivations. Besides being the usual ‘rat socialist, I could never want a man as President who has to go to these lengths to keep people from seeing who he is and knowing what he belives. All we have to go on are the peripherals and circumstancials, so to speak, and that’s his own fault (intent). Why? What is so controversial about what he really thinks and who he really is that he is making his whole campaign a blinding but empty “cult of personality” using a lot of pretty words but no detail at all? I know that no politician gives that much of themselves away or nails their flag to the mast that obviously, but he’s gone to greater lengths that any I’ve ever seen before.
Comparing Wright to Obama’s white grandmother is also ridiculous. Obama’s white grandmother did not stand in a pulpit and spew anti-American racist propaganda.
A lot of people (not me, probably not you either) assumed she’d just made a “gaffe”—but now everyone should realize that she was speaking directly from her racist, hate-filled heart. For the first time in her adult life, she was proud of her country, or at least tickled pink that so many had bought her husband’s flim flam act.
Ain't THAT the truth.
Also, comparing Wright to McCain’s “spiritual advisor” is ridiculous.
I find it expository, though, of the leftist mindset.
Anti-Islamic rhetoric is equated with anti-American, anti-white, and anti-Jew rhetoric.
Shows what side they’re on.
Gotta promote that one to tag-line status...
Two other opinion pieces in the same edition called Obama’s speech a homerun. Both of those columnists are black. And the WP’s editorial called the speech extraordinary and squarely addressing the issue of race. Gerson’s piece was the lone exception in this morning”s paper.
What connection? This is no analogy, IMHO. I know that the MSM has tried to float it, but it sank fast. A real analogy is this: Al Qaeda endorses Obama; Chavez endorses Obama; so does Castro. Hagee endorses McCain. There is only passing association; no one is saddled with it in these cases.
But everybody knows that the other three are pro-forma fluff.
I think Sen. Obama and wife Michelle, as bitter as they have been recently, should seek counseling, or therapy, instead of high political office. Additionally, avid supporters of Mr. Obama should look at left wing politics as less salvation for the masses, and more like creeing socialism without the violence.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.