The war in Iraq ended up to be the ultimate war on terror. On one hand it got rid of Saddam terrorist regime and on the other hand it attracted Al Qaeda to Iraq and where the terrorists threw everything they had to fight the U.S in Iraq but they ended up with an utter defeat and our troops have absolutely destroyed Al Qaeda terrorists in Iraq.
1 posted on
03/16/2008 2:50:00 PM PDT by
jveritas
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-53 next last
To: april15Bendovr; ikez78; 4woodenboats; Milligan
2 posted on
03/16/2008 2:51:35 PM PDT by
jveritas
(Rush Limbaugh (El Zibo) for President (extreme sarcasm))
To: jveritas
IMHO, it will be twenty years before the MSM is ready to admit their BDS-influenced bias.
3 posted on
03/16/2008 2:54:25 PM PDT by
sono
(The Future Ain't What It Used To Be - Yogi Berra)
To: jveritas
4 posted on
03/16/2008 2:55:54 PM PDT by
Southack
(Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
To: jveritas
I think in 10 years we will look back with that view....that the Iraq war was the decisive victory that weakened Al-Queda and eventually led to it’s failure as a terrorist group.
5 posted on
03/16/2008 2:55:57 PM PDT by
ilgipper
To: jveritas
The goal was to reach the Sunni areas in central Iraq and the beginning of the preparation to confront the US invasion and defeat it allah willing.I guess he was not willing. Just sayin...
6 posted on
03/16/2008 2:57:04 PM PDT by
Lowcountry
(RIP: Peterdanbrokaw)
To: jveritas
“I was in agreement with brother Abou Mussab regarding this analysis.”
LOL! As though Zarqawi was capable of ‘analysis’. These people are a bunch of illiterate, sub-retarded monkeys whose only purpose in life is to murder other people. They try to disguise their idiocy with religious verbiage, but in the end they’re just a bunch of chemically stupid serial killers.
7 posted on
03/16/2008 2:58:35 PM PDT by
navyguy
(Some days you are the pigeon, some days you are the statue.)
To: jveritas
AQ was in America before 9/11. Why would anyone with common sense think that AQ wasn’t in Iraq before the war?
To: jveritas
10 posted on
03/16/2008 2:59:17 PM PDT by
T. Buzzard Trueblood
("a wee bit silly." -Lord Trimble on Hillary Clinton's claim of foreign policy "experience".)
To: jveritas
Welcome back Joseph
Be interesting if Zarqawi and Mala Krekar worked together?
Here is that interesting article I had sent you on Krekar.
http://home.cogeco.ca/~konews/25-9-02-krekar-link-qaeda.html
Iraq Kurd said to admit bin Laden link
LONDON, Sept. 25 (UPI) — Mala Krekar, the leader of a Taliban-like Iraqi Kurdish group, has admitted to links with Osama bin Laden, according to an Iraqi Kurdish newspaper report Wednesday.
12 posted on
03/16/2008 3:02:41 PM PDT by
april15Bendovr
(Free Republic & Ron Paul Cult = oxymoron)
To: jveritas
Thank you for your work to bring out the truth.
14 posted on
03/16/2008 3:04:46 PM PDT by
iopscusa
(El Vaquero. (SC Lowcountry Cowboy))
To: jveritas
El-Ekhlaas terrorist forum is a password protected so you cannot access the document unless you are registered there as a member.Log-in ID: alsadr
Password: virgins
15 posted on
03/16/2008 3:07:03 PM PDT by
jdm
(Relax, it's just the internet.)
To: jveritas
Does hussein obama know this????
19 posted on
03/16/2008 3:13:33 PM PDT by
The Forgotten Man
(He works, he votes, generally he prays--but he always pays....)
To: jveritas
To: jveritas
26 posted on
03/16/2008 3:20:42 PM PDT by
woofie
To: jveritas
If this is true then why isn’t CNN stating that this is proof Al Qaeda was in Iraq before the invasion? (sarcasm)
To: jveritas
So, it was really the 11 United Nations resolutions and the 18-month "rush to war" that caused Al Qaeda to enter Iraq, not the US-led attack on Iraq?
-PJ
30 posted on
03/16/2008 3:24:49 PM PDT by
Political Junkie Too
(Repeal the 17th amendment -- it's the "Fairness Doctrine" for Congress!)
To: jveritas
Sorry, you should know better. Al Qaeda was involved virtually everywhere but Iraq.
The DNC has told us that............
31 posted on
03/16/2008 3:25:17 PM PDT by
Lakeshark
(Thank a member of the US armed forces for their sacrifice)
To: jveritas
99% of the reason why these lies have prevailed about Iraq are a lying, biased MSM, a treasonous Democrat party, and traitors in the CIA. It was George Tenet who took the lead in saying that there was NO CONNECTION between Saddam and 9/11.
But I will never understand why Bush went along with it. He did little or nothing to contradict these liars who were tearing him down, and several times he even seemed to say that the critics were right.
History may never correct these errors, because the leftists have controlled history for a long time, and will likely continue to do so.
A childhood neighbor of mine, Peter Braestrup, who once worked for the NY Times, wrote a fine book on the Tet Offensive, pointing out that we had won. It was well published, and reasonably widely read. But the media simply ignored or pooh poohed it. Many people on FR now know that we won the Tet Offensive, and could easily have won the war if we had had the will to do so, but few people knew it at that time, and relatively few people know it now.
If anything, the lies of historians and teachers about American history are getting worse, and few growing up now know as much as we did. I thought that the history I had—or didn’t have—in my public school years was bad then! But the wreckers were only getting started.
36 posted on
03/16/2008 3:49:58 PM PDT by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: Kaslin
37 posted on
03/16/2008 3:52:36 PM PDT by
Tut
To: jveritas
Well well well. Now, do you think the msm will report it?
Nah.
39 posted on
03/16/2008 3:54:57 PM PDT by
jackv
(DEMOCRATS HATE BUSH MORE THAN THEY LOVE THEIR COUNTRY!!!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-53 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson