Al Qaeda Document: Zarqawi Came to Iraq Before The War To Prepare The Fight Against U.S

Al Qaeda document | March 16 2008 | jveritas

[Dinah Lord]

Superb find, jveritas.

Bump

[jveritas]

Now he will but he will dismiss it, as will Hillary Clinton, liberals, and their media dismiss it.

[Para-Ord.45]

referanceping

[Eurale]

“These people are a bunch of illiterate, sub-retarded monkeys...”

No they are not. They are generally well educated and very well financed.

[txhurl]

bump

right moment?

[woofie]

bump

[jveritas]

Yes, the right moment. The liberals had their saying about Al Qaeda and Iraq connections and now we have ours.

[plain talk]

If this is true then why isn’t CNN stating that this is proof Al Qaeda was in Iraq before the invasion? (sarcasm)

[am452]

Can you post a link to thesite and this document?

[Political Junkie Too]

So, it was really the 11 United Nations resolutions and the 18-month "rush to war" that caused Al Qaeda to enter Iraq, not the US-led attack on Iraq?

-PJ

[Lakeshark]

Sorry, you should know better. Al Qaeda was involved virtually everywhere but Iraq.

The DNC has told us that............

[april15Bendovr]

It might be time to make another video.

[jveritas]

Let’s do it :)

[glock rocks]

AQ was in America before 9/11. Why would anyone with common sense think that AQ wasn’t in Iraq before the war?

Purposeful denial. MSM stuff. Newspeak. Subversion. Treason. You know, the things that used to be important to the survival of a republic. Down the memory hole.

[jveritas]

The site is called “Al Ekhlaas”, you cannot access it without being a registered member. If you want I can e-mail you a copy of the document that I printed from this site.

That is the link to the thread on Ekhlaas terrorist forum http://ekhlaas.info/forum/showthread.php?t=124250, as I said yo need to register to access it.

[Cicero]

99% of the reason why these lies have prevailed about Iraq are a lying, biased MSM, a treasonous Democrat party, and traitors in the CIA. It was George Tenet who took the lead in saying that there was NO CONNECTION between Saddam and 9/11.

But I will never understand why Bush went along with it. He did little or nothing to contradict these liars who were tearing him down, and several times he even seemed to say that the critics were right.

History may never correct these errors, because the leftists have controlled history for a long time, and will likely continue to do so.

A childhood neighbor of mine, Peter Braestrup, who once worked for the NY Times, wrote a fine book on the Tet Offensive, pointing out that we had won. It was well published, and reasonably widely read. But the media simply ignored or pooh poohed it. Many people on FR now know that we won the Tet Offensive, and could easily have won the war if we had had the will to do so, but few people knew it at that time, and relatively few people know it now.

If anything, the lies of historians and teachers about American history are getting worse, and few growing up now know as much as we did. I thought that the history I had—or didn’t have—in my public school years was bad then! But the wreckers were only getting started.

[Tut]

Ping

[april15Bendovr]

“A lie can travel halfway around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes.”

Mark Twain

And the media takes full advantage of that

[jackv]

Well well well. Now, do you think the msm will report it?
Nah.

[jveritas]

The Saddam-9/11 connections was very much focused on by liberals and their media to cover and dismiss the other very important thing such as Al Qaeda presence in Iraq before the war started.