Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Nice find. Too bad they have the Treasure Act and others in the Uk.

1 posted on 03/16/2008 11:22:06 AM PDT by BGHater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: SunkenCiv

Ping


2 posted on 03/16/2008 11:25:06 AM PDT by csvset
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BGHater

If they’re priceless how is he gonna get any money for em?


3 posted on 03/16/2008 11:27:07 AM PDT by woofie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BGHater
Link to the Treasure Act of 1996.

Looks like he will lose ownership to "The Crown". Sorry big guy.

4 posted on 03/16/2008 11:27:37 AM PDT by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BGHater; montag813
Who will receive the reward?

This is set out in detail in the Code of Practice. To summarise:

where the finder has permission to be on the land, the rewards should continue to be paid in full to him or her (the burden of proof as to whether he or she has permission will rest with the finder). If the finder makes an agreement with the occupier/landowner to share a reward, the Secretary of State will normally follow it;
if the finder does not remove the whole of a find from the ground but allows archaeologists to excavate the remainder of the find, the original finder will normally be eligible for a reward for the whole find;
rewards will not normally be payable when the find is made by an archaeologist;
where the finder has committed an offence in relation to a find, or has trespassed, or has not followed best practice as set out in the Code of Practice, he or she may expect no reward at all or a reduced reward. Landowners and occupiers will be eligible for rewards in such cases.

How long will it take before I receive my reward?
Who will receive the reward?

This is set out in detail in the Code of Practice. To summarise:

where the finder has permission to be on the land, the rewards should continue to be paid in full to him or her (the burden of proof as to whether he or she has permission will rest with the finder). If the finder makes an agreement with the occupier/landowner to share a reward, the Secretary of State will normally follow it;
if the finder does not remove the whole of a find from the ground but allows archaeologists to excavate the remainder of the find, the original finder will normally be eligible for a reward for the whole find;
rewards will not normally be payable when the find is made by an archaeologist;
where the finder has committed an offence in relation to a find, or has trespassed, or has not followed best practice as set out in the Code of Practice, he or she may expect no reward at all or a reduced reward. Landowners and occupiers will be eligible for rewards in such cases.

The Code of Practice states that you should receive a reward within one year of your having delivered your find, although this may take longer in the case of very large finds or those that present special difficulties. If no museum wants to acquire the find it should be disclaimed within 6 months or within 3 months if it is a single object.

6 posted on 03/16/2008 11:36:41 AM PDT by divine_moment_of_facts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

Ping.....


9 posted on 03/16/2008 11:46:18 AM PDT by river rat (Semper Fi - You may turn the other cheek, but I prefer to look into my enemy's vacant dead eyes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BGHater

Oh, he’ll get paid. Then he’ll turn it all back in taxes.


11 posted on 03/16/2008 12:06:59 PM PDT by sphinx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BGHater

Do they still work in Italian vending machines?


12 posted on 03/16/2008 12:08:12 PM PDT by purpleraine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BGHater

do they have chocolate inside?


17 posted on 03/16/2008 12:58:58 PM PDT by steveo (Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a banana.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BGHater

They don’t say whose name is on the coins and the image is small, but it looks like it’s probably that of Carausius (286-293), a usurper in Britain who was never officially recognized by the emperors Diocletian and Maximian.


19 posted on 03/16/2008 1:17:21 PM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BGHater
They're mine. I was time traveling in my Sophia Loren and I stopped off in England to take a whiz. The fell through a hole in my Toga.

Quae Cum Ita Sunt, please forward them to Jim Robinson and I'll share them with Free Republic!

21 posted on 03/16/2008 1:46:45 PM PDT by Young Werther (Julius Caesar (Quae Cum Ita Sunt. Since these things are so.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: csvset; blam; StayAt HomeMother; Ernest_at_the_Beach; 1ofmanyfree; 24Karet; 3AngelaD; 49th; ...

· join list or digest · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post a topic ·

 
Gods
Graves
Glyphs
Thanks csvset.

To all -- please ping me to other topics which are appropriate for the GGG list.
GGG managers are Blam, StayAt HomeMother, and Ernest_at_the_Beach
 

· Google · Archaeologica · ArchaeoBlog · Archaeology magazine · Biblical Archaeology Society ·
· Mirabilis · Texas AM Anthropology News · Yahoo Anthro & Archaeo ·
· History or Science & Nature Podcasts · Excerpt, or Link only? · cgk's list of ping lists ·


22 posted on 03/17/2008 1:07:35 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/______________________Profile updated Saturday, March 1, 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson