Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

F-117 Stealth Fighter to Be Retired
AP ^ | March 11, 2008 | JAMES HANNAH

Posted on 03/11/2008 8:17:16 AM PDT by Joiseydude

DAYTON, Ohio (AP) - The world's first attack aircraft to employ stealth technology is slipping quietly into history.

The inky black, angular, radar-evading F-117, which spent 27 years in the Air Force arsenal secretly patrolling hostile skies from Serbia to Iraq, will be put in mothballs next month in Nevada.

Wright-Patterson Air Force Base in Dayton, which manages the F-117 program, will have an informal, private retirement ceremony Tuesday with military leaders, base employees and representatives from Holloman Air Force Base in New Mexico.

(Excerpt) Read more at wtop.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aerospace
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-136 next last
To: RobRoy
"They are all disk or “cigar” shaped."


81 posted on 03/11/2008 10:49:57 AM PDT by UCANSEE2 (Just saying what 'they' won't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ArrogantBustard

82 posted on 03/11/2008 10:54:25 AM PDT by UCANSEE2 (Just saying what 'they' won't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Fundamentally Fair; em2vn
I seem to remember that people were upset because Jimmy Carter inadvertedly publically mentioned the stealth program about the time the below attached was going on. He only mentioned it one time.

The official acknowledgment and unveiling of Northrop Grumman’s B-2A “Spirit” did not come until 22 November 1988, but the roots of the B-2 can be traced back to the late 1970s when President Jimmy Carter canceled production of the proposed 240 B-1As. The Air Force wanted the supersonic, swing-wing bomber to complement its B-52 heavy bomber in projecting US global nuclear bombing capabilities to potential adversaries. At the time, President Carter was highly criticized, but only by people who had no knowledge of the United States’ top-secret stealth technology under development (Pace 15).

83 posted on 03/11/2008 10:59:12 AM PDT by blam (Secure the border and enforce the law)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: exit82

“Man, that girl is HOT!”


84 posted on 03/11/2008 11:02:05 AM PDT by UCANSEE2 (Just saying what 'they' won't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K
By the mid 90s, the F-117 was able to be tracked on radar but only by experienced operators using the newest and most advanced sets, something our potential enemies never had in great supply. Western allies were able to do it first. One drawback the F-117 had was that it would show up if the plane was wet.

From what I heard it never was 100% percent invisible to radar, but it's return was so low if it did occasionally show up as a blip, tracking systems would read it as a bird.

85 posted on 03/11/2008 11:07:41 AM PDT by Hillarys Gate Cult (The man who said "there's no such thing as a stupid question" has never talked to Helen Thomas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Quix; ArrogantBustard
“We already have the means to travel among the stars, but these technologies are locked up in black projects and it would take an act of God to ever get them out to benefit humanity….. anything you can imagine we already know how to do.” Ben Rich, former Head of the Lockheed Skunk Works

Was that what you were referring to?

I've heard the Lecture was videotaped, haven't ever seen a transcript other than the above quote.

86 posted on 03/11/2008 11:10:31 AM PDT by AFreeBird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Shryke
google is your friend...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Over-the-horizon_radar
http://eospso.gsfc.nasa.gov/eos_observ/7_8_96/p18.html

The -117 angles and all are designed for a specific band.

as an aside, OTH-B can even be used to track storm waves, it's all in the software.

87 posted on 03/11/2008 11:11:58 AM PDT by ASOC (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Portcall24

In 1982 I got arrested and handcuffed on the flightline of George AFB. This was because the Security Police desk Sgt forgot to tell the night shift desk we had special permission to be there.


88 posted on 03/11/2008 11:20:25 AM PDT by saminfl (,/i)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Fundamentally Fair; em2vn
CRACKS IN THE BLACK DIKE SECRECY, THE MEDIA, AND THE F-117A

"On 22 August Secretary of Defense Harold Brown held a press conference to clarify the stealth "leak." At the conference, Brown confirmed the details published in the media. The purpose of confirming the leaks, Brown insisted, was to create a "firebreak" and prevent further information about the program being revealed. Unsurprisingly, official confirmation of a supposedly secret program was seized upon as an ideal political weapon by Republicans, who accused the Carter administration of revealing secret military technology to rebuff their own claim that President Carter had neglected defense matters.14 "

89 posted on 03/11/2008 11:21:07 AM PDT by blam (Secure the border and enforce the law)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: ASOC

Neither of your sources discusses stealth detection. I’ve read a bit on low freq stuff, but it is inherently innaccurate. Anything else? Google mostly returns blogs.


90 posted on 03/11/2008 11:21:15 AM PDT by Shryke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: AFreeBird

Yes.

It’s on YouTube.

i think you can find the link by searching at

HTTP://WWW.ABOVETOPSECRET.COM

I probably have it amidst my shortcuts but that’s a search in itself. LOL. Doing grading now.

Thanks.


91 posted on 03/11/2008 11:33:25 AM PDT by Quix (GOD ALONE IS GOD; WORTHY; PAID THE PRICE; IS COMING AGAIN; KNOWS ALL; IS LOVING; IS ALTOGETHER GOOD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: AFreeBird

The guy was a VERY successful leader of some megabucks operations . . .

Why would folks CHOOSE to disbelieve him?

Fascinating psychologically and sociologically.

None are so blind as those who WILL NOT see.


92 posted on 03/11/2008 11:34:13 AM PDT by Quix (GOD ALONE IS GOD; WORTHY; PAID THE PRICE; IS COMING AGAIN; KNOWS ALL; IS LOVING; IS ALTOGETHER GOOD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: Shryke

Read a bit about PCL (passive coherent location) techniques.


93 posted on 03/11/2008 11:34:50 AM PDT by doorgunner69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: ArrogantBustard

BTW,

YOUR rationalizations for not believing Retiring Ben Rich of Lockeed is why . . . exactly . . . other than stubborn obtuseness, I mean.


94 posted on 03/11/2008 11:36:49 AM PDT by Quix (GOD ALONE IS GOD; WORTHY; PAID THE PRICE; IS COMING AGAIN; KNOWS ALL; IS LOVING; IS ALTOGETHER GOOD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: doorgunner69

Done. Again, extremely vague conclusions against stealth. How does it fare against the B2 for example? Or F-22?


95 posted on 03/11/2008 12:01:33 PM PDT by Shryke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: blam

You have a good memory.


96 posted on 03/11/2008 12:11:36 PM PDT by Fundamentally Fair (Experience Change!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2

Thanks—I think the bottom picture is a “four diamond”.;)


97 posted on 03/11/2008 12:17:46 PM PDT by exit82 (People get the government they deserve. And they are about to get it--in spades.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Kevmo
***Seems like this would be a good platform to supplement the Close Air Support guys in their Warthogs and/or reconfiguring the plane as an unmanned aerial vehicle to supplement the Global Hawks.

Not good for CAS. It has no gun, can't mount forward firing ordnance and its not invisible to the naked eye, so its an unarmored target during the day.

A recon version could be good, but its still not capable of self defense from a visual intercept, so the F-22 or JSF would be better.

98 posted on 03/11/2008 12:22:00 PM PDT by SampleMan (We are a free and industrious people, socialist nannies do not become us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Shryke

Vague of course due to the intensely classified nature of the beast. RCS data typically requires a Top Secret clearance and need to know. Vulnerabilities are most tightly held, so no way could someone knowledgeably discuss comparisons in a public forum without violating the law.

That said, you can figure the advances in stealth since the F-117 have addressed the weaknesses, either with technology or tactics or both.


99 posted on 03/11/2008 12:23:57 PM PDT by doorgunner69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: RobRoy; ArrogantBustard
I think they're going for something with more 'classic' lines. :-P


100 posted on 03/11/2008 12:26:19 PM PDT by uglybiker (I do not suffer from mental illness. I quite enjoy it, actually.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-136 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson