Posted on 03/11/2008 8:17:16 AM PDT by Joiseydude
DAYTON, Ohio (AP) - The world's first attack aircraft to employ stealth technology is slipping quietly into history.
The inky black, angular, radar-evading F-117, which spent 27 years in the Air Force arsenal secretly patrolling hostile skies from Serbia to Iraq, will be put in mothballs next month in Nevada.
Wright-Patterson Air Force Base in Dayton, which manages the F-117 program, will have an informal, private retirement ceremony Tuesday with military leaders, base employees and representatives from Holloman Air Force Base in New Mexico.
(Excerpt) Read more at wtop.com ...
Man, that girl is HOT!
From what I heard it never was 100% percent invisible to radar, but it's return was so low if it did occasionally show up as a blip, tracking systems would read it as a bird.
Was that what you were referring to?
I've heard the Lecture was videotaped, haven't ever seen a transcript other than the above quote.
The -117 angles and all are designed for a specific band.
as an aside, OTH-B can even be used to track storm waves, it's all in the software.
In 1982 I got arrested and handcuffed on the flightline of George AFB. This was because the Security Police desk Sgt forgot to tell the night shift desk we had special permission to be there.
"On 22 August Secretary of Defense Harold Brown held a press conference to clarify the stealth "leak." At the conference, Brown confirmed the details published in the media. The purpose of confirming the leaks, Brown insisted, was to create a "firebreak" and prevent further information about the program being revealed. Unsurprisingly, official confirmation of a supposedly secret program was seized upon as an ideal political weapon by Republicans, who accused the Carter administration of revealing secret military technology to rebuff their own claim that President Carter had neglected defense matters.14 "
Neither of your sources discusses stealth detection. I’ve read a bit on low freq stuff, but it is inherently innaccurate. Anything else? Google mostly returns blogs.
Yes.
It’s on YouTube.
i think you can find the link by searching at
I probably have it amidst my shortcuts but that’s a search in itself. LOL. Doing grading now.
Thanks.
The guy was a VERY successful leader of some megabucks operations . . .
Why would folks CHOOSE to disbelieve him?
Fascinating psychologically and sociologically.
None are so blind as those who WILL NOT see.
Read a bit about PCL (passive coherent location) techniques.
BTW,
YOUR rationalizations for not believing Retiring Ben Rich of Lockeed is why . . . exactly . . . other than stubborn obtuseness, I mean.
Done. Again, extremely vague conclusions against stealth. How does it fare against the B2 for example? Or F-22?
You have a good memory.
Thanks—I think the bottom picture is a “four diamond”.;)
Not good for CAS. It has no gun, can't mount forward firing ordnance and its not invisible to the naked eye, so its an unarmored target during the day.
A recon version could be good, but its still not capable of self defense from a visual intercept, so the F-22 or JSF would be better.
Vague of course due to the intensely classified nature of the beast. RCS data typically requires a Top Secret clearance and need to know. Vulnerabilities are most tightly held, so no way could someone knowledgeably discuss comparisons in a public forum without violating the law.
That said, you can figure the advances in stealth since the F-117 have addressed the weaknesses, either with technology or tactics or both.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.