Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Shocking news just in!!
1 posted on 03/11/2008 8:05:27 AM PDT by abb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
To: abb

http://deseretnews.com/article/1,5143,695260666,00.html

Utah to pay $40,000 in Taser settlement
By Linda Thomson
Deseret Morning News
Published: March 11, 2008
Jared Massey, the motorist who was shot with a Taser during a traffic arrest and who subsequently filed a lawsuit claiming the officer used excessive force, has accepted a settlement of $40,000.

Utah Highway Patrol trooper Jon Gardner used a Taser on Massey on Sept. 4, 2007, during a traffic stop outside Vernal. Massey refused to sign a speeding ticket and argued with Gardner, who ordered Massey out of the car. After Massey did not comply with commands to put his hands behind his back, Gardner used a Taser on Massey.

An unhappy Massey posted the videotaped incident from the squad car’s dash cam on YouTube, which prompted a huge outcry from the public. Some people even threatened violence against the trooper — which prompted Massey to issue a public statement calling for people to “have some common decency” and stop making threats.

The Department of Public Safety investigated the situation and cleared Gardner of any wrongdoing in handling an uncooperative motorist. He was, however, required to take a verbal communications course before returning to duty.

Massey pleaded guilty in Uintah County’s Justice Court to a reduced speeding charge and paid a fine of $107.

However, Massey later filed a federal lawsuit claiming Gardner had used excessive force against him.

“We think this is a legally defensible case because trooper Gardner acted reasonably to avert a volatile and potentially dangerous confrontation on the side of a busy highway,” said assistant Attorney General Scott Cheney, who represented Gardner, in a statement.

“We recognize, however, that this is a close case,” Cheney said.

The decision to settle was made by the Utah Attorney General’s Office, the UHP and the Utah Risk Management Fund, all of which agreed that this was the “best compromise to protect taxpayer resources.”

“This settlement was the most efficient resolution of what would be lengthy and expensive litigation of a strongly disputed claim,” Cheney said.

Massey was unavailable for comment Monday.

E-mail: lindat@desnews.com


2 posted on 03/11/2008 8:06:07 AM PDT by abb (Organized Journalism: Marxist-style collectivism applied to information sharing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: abb

Well, well, well......

I guess that the state of Utah and the COP WAS WRONG AFTER ALL.

That’s for all you jerks who defended the cop on that one.


3 posted on 03/11/2008 8:06:48 AM PDT by Rick.Donaldson (http://www.transasianaxis.com - Please visit for lastest on DPRK/Russia/China/et al.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: abb

It was the “Hurts, doesn’t it” and the second taze that got him the money.


4 posted on 03/11/2008 8:07:15 AM PDT by RobRoy (I'm confused. I mean, I THINK I am, but I'm not sure. But I could be wrong about that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: abb
We think this is a legally defensible case

Really????? Then why the payoff????

7 posted on 03/11/2008 8:12:48 AM PDT by NRA1995 (Bill Clinton: HILLARY!'s other big ass)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: abb

So what was the officer to do, allow Massey to knife, hit, shoot, kick, spit on him before defending himself? Would the cost of the officer’s life or limb have been enough to keep the state from issuing Massey a settlement? Should the cop not have acted human when he taunted the suspect by saying those outragous words, “hurts doesn’t it?”

Suspect rights over the rights of those upholding the law. That is what this settlement amounts to.


8 posted on 03/11/2008 8:13:06 AM PDT by navymom1 (Freedom is Talk Radio. Defeat the Fairness Doctrine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: abb

$40,000 is one expensive “ride”.


11 posted on 03/11/2008 8:17:54 AM PDT by Sue Perkick (And I hope that what I’ve done here today doesn’t force you to have a negative opinion of me….)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: abb

It has become a bit too common for LEO’s to taser those that don’t obey their every command, even those that are not under arrest. Sort of like training a dog. What started out as a non-lethal alternative to using their firearm has become a way to keep their uniform clean. Start hitting their employer in the wallet and I think we’ll see this trend subside.


12 posted on 03/11/2008 8:22:10 AM PDT by Niteranger68 (Where are they hiding Obama’s white half?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: abb

If you watch the video, it’s obvious that the dirty cop pulls over in a manner that deliberately blocks the following cars view of a short portable speed limit sign and then pulls out and throws the lights on the very next innocent motorist who passes by. A few moments later, the dirty cop tasers the motorist when he asks to see the speed limit sign. $40,000 is too cheap. There needs to be a major investigation of the crooked speed trap operation going on in that county.


19 posted on 03/11/2008 8:29:41 AM PDT by shuckmaster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: abb
We think this is a legally defensible case

Actually, if they thought it was a legally defensible case, they wouldn't have settled.

23 posted on 03/11/2008 8:35:53 AM PDT by B Knotts (Calvin Coolidge Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: abb

good. glad he got something. Being taser happy is not acceptable. I understand that most cops are tax collectors, but he should have used better judgement in collecting those taxes in this case.


28 posted on 03/11/2008 8:43:58 AM PDT by commonguymd (Let the socialists duke it out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: abb
The suit said Massey fell screaming in pain after being shocked while Gardner taunted him by saying, "Hurts, doesn't it?"

If this is true, then it isn't a "close case" and the state's getting off lightly.

66 posted on 03/11/2008 9:37:39 AM PDT by highball ("I never should have switched from scotch to martinis." -- the last words of Humphrey Bogart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: abb

“Just pay me, bro!”


74 posted on 03/11/2008 10:02:01 AM PDT by Deo volente
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: abb

So, all I have to do is bait a cop into zapping me for a quick $40K? Cool!


77 posted on 03/11/2008 10:07:17 AM PDT by JimRed ("Hey, hey, Teddy K., how many girls did you drown today?" TERM LIMITS, NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: abb

I saw that video. The officer doesn’t have the temperment to be in law enforcement. He had the bearing of a latent homosexual or someone with a deep rooted inferiority complex, sort of like Elliot Spritzer.


97 posted on 03/11/2008 10:58:58 AM PDT by farmer18th (The McCain Presidential Library Will Be Located in Tijuana - Under NAU Administration)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: abb

Too bad this cop wasn’t fired. I’m sure the cop was trained about folks being pretty ticked off when they get a speeding ticket and how to best handle the situation. I doubt arresting someone is part of the plan. I’d hate to see how the cop handles himself in a dangerous situation. He lost complete control and should not be in a position of authority especially when snap judgments could mean life or death.


102 posted on 03/11/2008 11:08:37 AM PDT by flutters (God Bless The USA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: abb
Useful hint:

Don't drive >60 in a 40, then you don't have to worry about being stopped in the first place.

123 posted on 03/11/2008 2:22:26 PM PDT by TChris ("if somebody agrees with me 70% of the time, rather than 100%, that doesn’t make him my enemy." -RR)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: abb

Good start.

But the cop should have also been fired.


177 posted on 03/12/2008 11:35:46 AM PDT by Mr. Brightside ( Ronald Reagan Would Back McCain - http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1970504/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: abb

“An unhappy Massey posted the videotaped incident from the squad car’s dash cam on YouTube, which prompted a huge outcry from the public. Some people even threatened violence against the trooper — which prompted Massey to issue a public statement calling for people to “have some common decency” and stop making threats.”

The cops better get a clue that their increasingly antagonistic attitude towards law abiding citizens is what’s becoming indecent. I understand the police have a far tougher job to do these days, but they are turning the american public increasingly against them and sooner or later it’s going to blow up in their face.


178 posted on 03/12/2008 11:36:06 AM PDT by tueffelhunden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: abb
We think this is a legally defensible case because Trooper Gardner acted reasonably to avert a volatile and potentially dangerous confrontation on the side of a busy highway," said Assistant Attorney General Scott Cheney

AAG Cheney is a liar, and this statement will no doubt follow his career, making his future road quite bumpy.

There was zip justification for this individual being violently electrocuted.

202 posted on 03/12/2008 2:16:40 PM PDT by dragnet2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: abb

Speeders cause an enormous amount of death and destruction on the nation’s highways. This stupid decision inspires them to speed even more.


281 posted on 03/18/2008 12:20:47 PM PDT by eleni121 (Solzhenitsyn on the bombing of Serbia: "no difference whatsoever between NATO and the Nazis")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson