[Content Provider]

Texas is the best example of that, since the Dems have both a primary and a caucus, with the delegates evenly divided between them. Primaries: Clinton 51%, Obama 47%. Caucuses: Obama 56% Clinton 44% (last I checked... returns were still incoming).

Clinton netted only a handful of delegates from the primaries, and is going to lose a good deal more than that from the caucuses... in other words, primary results aside, Clinton lost Texas.

[Theodore R.]

Yea, who would have thought that Bill Clinton would have been outfoxed in caucuses by Hussein, Jr.?

[kingattax]

its much harder for the clintons to manufacture 1000s of illegal mexican “voters” in a caucus

[seekthetruth]

“Clinton netted only a handful of delegates from the primaries, and is going to lose a good deal more than that from the caucuses... in other words, primary results aside, Clinton lost Texas.”

And my sweetheart had Fox on with Dee Dee Myers talking about what a great ticket of Hillary/Obama would be! It doesn’t matter to the DNC that Obama is ahead in votes and delegates. It is Hillary’s turn in their view, I guess. Will be fun to watch the fighting!

[attiladhun2]

IOW, the Clintonoids (with their hemorrhoids) have as much to raise a ruckus about at the convention as the Obamites. I hope it turns into a politcal bloodbath.