1 posted on
03/08/2008 11:01:30 AM PST by
vietvet67
To: vietvet67
The courts will look like “chocolate courts” perhaps
2 posted on
03/08/2008 11:02:54 AM PST by
JoanneSD
(illegals represented without taxation.. Americans taxed without representation)
To: vietvet67
This is really scary. Reason enough to vote for McCain. With him, at least we have a chance at getting good judges. We’ll have no such luck with Jug Ears.
3 posted on
03/08/2008 11:03:42 AM PST by
Parmenio
To: vietvet67
But didn’t you hear, no difference between Obama and McCain. At least that’s what “True Conservatives” tell us.
4 posted on
03/08/2008 11:06:02 AM PST by
The_Republican
(You know why Chelsea Clinton is so Ugly? Because Janet Reno is her Father! LOL! - Mac is Back!)
To: vietvet67
We can not let Hillary or Obama win. The liberals are at the end of the line on the Supreme Court. We can put a stake in the heart of a liberal Supreme Court for another twenty years, or we can let them reload the court with a bunch of young far-left liberals.
5 posted on
03/08/2008 11:06:04 AM PST by
Always Right
(Was it over when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor?)
To: vietvet67
If Barack Obama is elected president, he will probably
That scare tactic has been used with presidential elections for years.
But, look at the track record. Those with R haven't done such a stellar job of appointing justices. Even with the current R, we almost got Harriet Miers.
McCain has said he doesn't care for the Alito-type justices who wear conservatism on their sleeve. McCain also voted for Ruth Bader Ginsberg and he supported the nomination of Harriet Miers.
Chances are, whether it is McCain, Clinton or Obama, their judicial picks will be of the left-leaning moderate type, as that is probably all they can get through confirmation.
9 posted on
03/08/2008 11:15:23 AM PST by
TomGuy
To: vietvet67
If Obamie the Commie is elected, the SCOTUS will entrench social Marxism to the point that it will not be possible for the nation to recover. That, and national defense, are the reasons McCain has to be elected.
To: vietvet67
McCain has already said he’d never appoint an Alito, because he ...”wears his conservativism on his sleeve”...who would McCain appoint...probably another Souter.
Who would Barry appoint...probably another Souter.
13 posted on
03/08/2008 11:22:18 AM PST by
kjo
To: vietvet67
This is the ONE Big reason that I will vote for McCain.
15 posted on
03/08/2008 11:32:28 AM PST by
fish hawk
(The religion of Darwinism = Monkey Intellect)
To: vietvet67
Practice these:
Justice Boxer
Justice Feinstein
Justice Sheila Jackson Lee
Justice Jesse Jackson, Jr.
Justice Rangel
“But officer, no need to search the house. We turned in all our firearms last week.”
To: vietvet67
McCain is younger than more than half the Court but he’s “too old to serve” because he’s not a Democrat. LOL!
To: vietvet67
The SC thing isn't workin’ for me. Only leftist judges look to be leaving in the next several years. (barring the unexpected). So Worst case scenario, status quo is maintained. I see no different scenario with McCain. NO matter what he says. His word has no value with me. He likes leftists and I believe he will try to appoint them, simply by calling them conservatives.
32 posted on
03/08/2008 2:48:27 PM PST by
isrul
(Help make koranimals an endangered species)
To: vietvet67
35 posted on
03/12/2008 8:00:30 PM PDT by
neverdem
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson