Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Clinton: ‘Be careful what you wish for, Rush’
The Hill ^

Posted on 03/05/2008 6:46:48 AM PST by Sub-Driver

Clinton: ‘Be careful what you wish for, Rush’ By Klaus Marre Posted: 03/05/08 09:30 AM [ET]

Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (N.Y.), buoyed by important victories in the Democratic primaries in Texas, Ohio and Rhode Island, on Wednesday offered some words of warning to conservative talk show host Rush Limbaugh, who had urged Republicans to vote for her as the presumptively easier Democrat to beat.

“Be careful what you wish for, Rush,” Clinton said on Fox News.

For the second time during this campaign season, the former first lady survived what many viewed as a potential knockout punch from frontrunning Sen. Barack Obama (Ill.). While Obama maintains a significant delegate lead, he was unable to seal the nominations Tuesday night, having to concede another two populous states to Clinton.

“By getting the most delegates, by having won twice as many states, by having a lead in the popular vote we feel as if we are on pace to get the nomination,” Obama said Wednesday morning in an appearance on the same network. “And it will take a little longer than would be true if we weren’t running against a Clinton, but we’re still going to end up getting it.”

However, instead of being able to focus on Sen. John McCain (Ariz.), the newly crowned Republican nominee, Obama must now continue to expend his considerable resources on the Democratic primary.

The Clinton campaign is seeking to use the breathing room the former first lady was given in polling places in Texas, Ohio and Rhode Island to map out its “path to the presidency,” as a memo from strategists Harold Ickes and Mark Penn was labeled.

In the document, the Clinton team says it is “time for a second look” on the race and the candidates and argued that the “momentum has swung

(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008; democratparty; elections; hillary; rushlimbaugh; talkradio
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300 ... 461-465 next last
To: Digital Sniper

No Obama would be much easier. His achilles heal has been exposed - foreign policy. That’s how Clinton came back - by attacking him on that. Not that Clinton has any credentials in that area but she will say her time as First Lady is her experience and incredibly she will get away with it in the general.


261 posted on 03/05/2008 8:23:58 AM PST by lasereye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Red in Blue PA

As do I. I fear that el Rushbo may end up being too cute by half.


262 posted on 03/05/2008 8:24:08 AM PST by Deo et Patria ("Don't taze me, bro!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: lasereye

With the remaining states it’s not easy.


263 posted on 03/05/2008 8:24:20 AM PST by tobyhill (The media lies so much the truth is the exception)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 255 | View Replies]

To: rurgan
Republicans in Texas were going to vote in at least a 2 to 1 margin for Obama bfore Rush’s , Levin’s , Ingraham’s and Hannity’s stunts and interference for Hillary.

Is that based on data, or is it your supposition?

And, given that Obama won more delegates than Hillary last night, what difference would it have made?

Do you have some facts to back up your assertions, or are you just angry?

264 posted on 03/05/2008 8:25:23 AM PST by TonyInOhio (Dedicated to the preservation of American Exceptionalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 251 | View Replies]

To: Hoof Hearted

Rush outsmarted himself. He just gave us a Hillary/Obama ticket. The women will come out for Hillary. The young people for Obama. Women are the majority and many women will register for the first time to vote for Hillary. So we get 8 years of Hillary followed by 8 years of Obama. This is what you do when you give evil a chance. We had a chance to kill evil (Hillary) stick a stake through her heart. Thanks Rush for 8 years of Hillary followed by 8 years of Obama. I see you support Rush’s stupid stunt and 8 years of Hillary followed by 8 years of Obama.


265 posted on 03/05/2008 8:26:12 AM PST by rurgan (socialism doesn't work. Government is the problem not the solution to our problems.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: fightinJAG

Give this time. Hillary and Obama are going to waste millions fighting each other and will go at it tooth and nail.


266 posted on 03/05/2008 8:26:23 AM PST by Slump Tester (Only CINOs and democRATs knowingly and willingly vote for RINOs!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 238 | View Replies]

To: All

LAURA INGRAHAM screening calls...setting up strawman argument by only allowing Dems pissed at crossover Republicans.

Let the Repubs in Laura. A little defensive aren’t you Ingra-Ham.


267 posted on 03/05/2008 8:26:51 AM PST by rbmillerjr ("bigger government means constricting freedom"....................RWR)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 260 | View Replies]

To: palmer
Hillary will choose Obama for her veep and be the great uniter after her miraculous comeback.

Provided Hillary doesn't so offend Obama and his supporters by the tactics which she will probably have to use to secure the nomination, this ticket would be tough for McCain to beat. Not impossible but tough.

268 posted on 03/05/2008 8:26:53 AM PST by CommerceComet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Dixie Yooper
Rush wanting his listeners to play with their vote is the most un-American thing he has ever done. I used to be a fan of his before this election. Never again.

I agree.

I'm still a fan of his, but he messed up big-time here.

This was childish and stupid and unbelievably risky. And I also object to the idea that one's vote is something to game.

269 posted on 03/05/2008 8:27:16 AM PST by fightinJAG (Rush was right when he used to say: "You NEVER win by losing.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: 38special
A Hillary/Obama ticket is a foregone conclusion now I’m afraid.

Yep. This 'fix' was planned before they got Obama to address the '04 convention. He's playing his part very convincingly.

This is Roller-derby 101: he blocks so she can get in, later, she returns the favor by sling-shotting him (with more 'experience') to the top in '12. By then he'll have to run on New Deal II as she will have wrecked the economy and possibly started WW III (or is it IV, I can't keep track).

270 posted on 03/05/2008 8:27:44 AM PST by budwiesest (The Clinton fix is in. If these two crooks can't steal the election, nobody can.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Neu Pragmatist

Again, Hillary did not have a stunning victory yesterday despite the spin. She is losing. I think Obama may have won more delegates in Texas...he may have actually netted more delegates overall. Hillary survived-nothing more. Now I would have preferred her to be out entirely. However, she is not in a good position to dictate to anyone. She would be the VP-however, I doubt it will happen. The supers will at some point-maybe before PA move behind the candidate who can win-based on elected delegates. Do the math. At this point, Hillary knows the jig is up and returns to her career in the senate and waits for 2012. She can run again-young enough. If this was her last chance, it might be different.


271 posted on 03/05/2008 8:27:44 AM PST by nyconse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 254 | View Replies]

To: Just mythoughts
Maybe all the Rush bashing is because these people know in their hear of hearts what a lame candidate lord McCain actually is. Allll the easier to do what liberals do and point an accusing finger to the first talk show host they can name

Not true in my case. I believe Rush was fundamentally wrong with his recruitment to skew the election. This is the fellow who loudly brags he can be trusted with your wife or daughter. That he has morals and morality. I submit that the promotion to undermine the election process fundamentally violates a core value.

272 posted on 03/05/2008 8:28:08 AM PST by Zuben Elgenubi (Rush's 20MM listeners per week is reduced by one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies]

To: fightinJAG

I’m with you. I wanted the beast dead. The Clintons are like those inflatable clown punching bags. They just pop back up. People keep telling me I overestimate the Clintons. Well, when they lose a race I’ll believe I overestimated them. I haven’t seen it yet, though.


273 posted on 03/05/2008 8:28:11 AM PST by Richard Kimball (Sure, they'd love to kill me, as long as they can do it without admitting I exist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 256 | View Replies]

To: fightinJAG

“How can it be bad? Hildy AND Obama are on the ticket, in whatever order.

That’s likely. And bad.”

Read my previous posts why its likely not to happen that they team up. The only reasoning for it is party bosses pressuring them to team up. It’s not in Obamas best interest to be Hillary’s VP or to have Hillary as his VP for the many reasons I’ve laid out. We’ll see.


274 posted on 03/05/2008 8:28:14 AM PST by Old Teufel Hunden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies]

To: PeskyOne
"It doesn't sound like McCain is willing to expose the shortcomings of Obama,"

McCain didn't come all this way to soft peddle the Dims and lose the race . If McCain doesn't yet realize what he's up against , it will become obvious rather quickly . McCain will not let them roll over him , he is a tenacious fighter .

275 posted on 03/05/2008 8:28:17 AM PST by Neu Pragmatist (Let's focus on winning back the House , it's our only hope .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 249 | View Replies]

To: rurgan

“Funny how Rush never told us to vote for any conservative like TAncredo, Thompson, Hunter, Romney but now tells us to vote for Hillary.”

This is the most pround statement in your post.


276 posted on 03/05/2008 8:28:27 AM PST by wilco200
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: varon

Eight years of the ‘Toons and then eight years of Obama, after he serves as her VP.


277 posted on 03/05/2008 8:28:40 AM PST by fightinJAG (Rush was right when he used to say: "You NEVER win by losing.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: nyconse
Any other candidate would be out already.

You just blew your own case.

278 posted on 03/05/2008 8:28:42 AM PST by palmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 245 | View Replies]

To: fightinJAG

Rush used to be more principled. I am disappointed in him. Elections are serious business-not games. He has succumbed to Washingtonitis-they all do eventually.


279 posted on 03/05/2008 8:29:49 AM PST by nyconse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 269 | View Replies]

To: nyconse

They won’t force her out! They will force Obama to name her as her VP.

As this dum bass stunt did yesterday was increase the likelihood that BOTH candidates will be on the Rat ticket.


280 posted on 03/05/2008 8:30:03 AM PST by fightinJAG (Rush was right when he used to say: "You NEVER win by losing.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300 ... 461-465 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson