Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama mentioned among documents recovered by Colombia from slain FARC leader Raúl Reyes
http://www.marthacolmenares.com/2008/03/03/hasta-obama-sale-a-relucir-en-cartas-encontradas-a-reyes/ ^ | Martha Colmenares

Posted on 03/04/2008 11:11:28 AM PST by ElCapitanAmericaLives

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-114 last
To: sanchmo
LOL
When Obama made that statement I was just dumbfounded
‘he wants to pull out now we are winning and after so many gave their lives to get us to there and now if bin ladens makes a base there with his cronies then we go back in.

of course that is if we have enough to back in with after we go into Pakistan and reduce the size of the military

obama and foreign policy really should not go in the same sentence and I have to say Obama’s voters have to be the thickest set of voters which have ever turned out

I’m voting for him because he wants change
OK what change
I don’t know
well how would he change
I don’t know
what has he done while in the senate
I don’t know
do you know anything about him
AH yes he wants change

every Obama voter should be embarrassed and this just proves why the voting age for some should be raised as these students have no idea what they are voting for except he is popular so says the media and he wants change

also this just confirms why we should be asked 5 questions about the candidates before we vote

101 posted on 03/04/2008 3:54:36 PM PST by manc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Rennes Templar

Actually, he’s only half-wrong. The latest Pew poll shows most people think we’re winning and a big majority OPPOSE unilateral withdrawal.

As for whether it was a good idea in the first place, that’s another story...but not really relevant right now.

He was right on the main point, though. Advocating surrender will ensure a Dem loss.

Book it.

Hank


102 posted on 03/04/2008 3:59:18 PM PST by County Agent Hank Kimball (I'll vote for Juan McStain if and when he leaves the Worldwide Church of Global Warming.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: supremedoctrine

LOL that would be great. Good idea.


103 posted on 03/04/2008 4:19:53 PM PST by Brandie (Card carrying Dittohead, 24/7 member, Love M.Levin and Laura I. as well. Thank you Jim Robinson 4 FR)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: ElCapitanAmericaLives

Not only that, it would appear that he is (was—lol) expecting an Obama victory to benefit his fellow Commie-Narco-Terrorists.


104 posted on 03/04/2008 4:37:42 PM PST by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ElCapitanAmericaLives
Marxists support Obama.

This is news?

105 posted on 03/04/2008 5:43:52 PM PST by magellan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: magellan; ElCapitanAmericaLives; El Conservador; Alia; livius; proud_yank; Kenny Bunk; ...
"Marxists support Obama.

This is news?
"

Not really magellan, but why don't you and everyone else take a look at this.

From our perspective the prospect of ties between the FARC and the Obama campaign is signficant and of great interest to us for the obvious reasons of its relevance to our current election cycle.

But the Colombians have a different take on the letter from which the extract is quoted at the beginning of this thread.

The website of the Colombian newspaper El Espectador, who I trust, has put up a list of all the FARC documents taken from Raul Reyes' computer. They entitle this one, and we are only viewing one clause of it in the introduction to this thread, "Official Alliance FARC and Government of Ecuador" for list item no. 2 (I'm going to post the English translation from the first link above):

". . . 2. A summary of the meeting with President Correa's Envoy follows:

a) He asked for a personal meeting in Quito with the Secretariat. He offered assurances and transportation from the border to the meeting place.
b) He expects us to send back a reply as soon as possible, including the meeting date.
c) He asked whether we would like to make this with military support of with support of his minister of state security.
d) He wants to talk to the FARC about the humanitarian agreement, the border policies, the political solution, Ingrid, and Chávez's role. He wants to establish communications with us over the bilateral border.
e) He wants to explain the purposes of Plan Ecuador, through which he intends to offset the harmful effects of Plan Colombia and which is to be implemented over the border.
f) For the purposes of Plan Ecuador, they are asking us for courses on mass organization for people living in the border, which the government would later designate to coordinate work in the border. The advantage in this is the fact that these people are part of the Clandestine Army or in the Bilateral Committee oriented by Front 18.
g) He insisted he is interesting in cooperating with the swap of prisoners, for which he is calling for the release of Moncayo's son or any other prisoner. . . .
"

Now it might not get too many of us excited to hear that the government of Ecuador has formed an "official" alliance with the FARC, but I can promise you it strikes a nerve among Colombians.

We're going to hear a lot more about this in the future. This is not going away quickly. I can smell the coffee boiling all the way up here.

And by the way magellan, good to see you. I've been away a while, my bad!
106 posted on 03/04/2008 7:52:25 PM PST by StJacques (Liberty is always unfinished business)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: ElCapitanAmericaLives

ping


107 posted on 03/05/2008 12:20:31 AM PST by AnimalLover ( ((Are there special rules and regulations for the big guys?)))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: catbertz
lol Alright alright I'm in thanks to everyone in this thread.

Oh, really? Wait until McCain signs the national gun-registration law the other side wants, that they'll use to criminalize you for being the way you are.

108 posted on 03/05/2008 3:23:51 PM PST by lentulusgracchus ("Whatever." -- sinkspur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: ElCapitanAmericaLives

Kickin’ it up top!


109 posted on 03/06/2008 2:35:04 AM PST by endthematrix (He was shouting 'Allah!' but I didn't hear that. It just sounded like a lot of crap to me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ElCapitanAmericaLives
Kouchner :

Photo of FARC leader dead

Le corps de Raul Reyes tué par l'armée colombienne le 1er mars 2008. © AFP.

Link to complete article

110 posted on 03/06/2008 2:49:25 AM PST by dennisw (Never bet on a false prophet! <<<||>>> Never bet on Islam!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dennisw

OK, I thought that was a pic of Chairman Mao on his shirt.

Turns out that’s “tirofijo”(sureshort)or Marulanda, the leader of the FARC. So his pajamas consisted of his pair of undies and a shirt of his pathetic leader. What a way to go!


111 posted on 03/06/2008 4:57:45 AM PST by ElCapitanAmericaLives
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: ElCapitanAmericaLives

So how much money has Chavez and FARC donated to Obamarama?

“6. The gringos will ask for an appointment with the minister to solicit him to communicate to us his interest in discussing these topics. They say that the new president of their country will be Obama and that they are interested in your compatriots. Obama will not support “Plan Colombia” nor will he sign the TLC (Colombian Free Trade agreement). Here we responded that we are interested in relations with all governments in equality of conditions and that in the case of the US it is required a public pronouncement expressing their interest in talking with the FARC given their eternal war against us.”


112 posted on 03/06/2008 11:34:46 AM PST by Grampa Dave ("Ron Paul and his flaming antiwar spam monkeys can Kiss my Ass!!"- Jim Robinson, Sept, 30, 2007)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jerod

bet youre eating your words now!


113 posted on 11/23/2008 8:09:05 AM PST by theana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: theana

Not really... The media ignored the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and everything regarding foreign affairs. They concentrated on the economy and failed to look at the big picture. They essentially misled wobbly Republicans and Independents into forgetting about world affairs, and convinced them that Barry O was the answer to their financial woes.

The reality is that war and international affairs always trump the economy and sadly enough, Obama has abandoned those important matters and deferred them to Hillary Clinton, an odd and probably disastrous decision. The first of many I’m sure.


114 posted on 11/25/2008 6:38:13 AM PST by jerod (They were pro-abortion, for gun control & wanted a cleaner environment at all cost - The NAZI party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-114 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson