Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

"You swore that he was the father when you took out a child support action," Judge Roper told Ms. Hope. He said he considered that action fraudulent and ordered Ms. Hope to repay Mr. Samuels the $14,460 he had paid in child support payments.

Good on ya judge.

$14,000 over 11 years

$106.06 per month

I did the math because I was curious.

1 posted on 03/04/2008 9:05:14 AM PST by MotleyGirl70
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: MotleyGirl70
Mr. Wallace told the judge at a hearing last summer that he heard from different people that the child looked like him. The child called him daddy when she saw him in town, Mr. Wallace said.

That seems odd.

2 posted on 03/04/2008 9:08:47 AM PST by ClearCase_guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MotleyGirl70

Damn. A judge that gives a hoot about the law, and justice. A rarity these days.


3 posted on 03/04/2008 9:08:59 AM PST by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MotleyGirl70

This happened in a Georgia court? This reversal is truly a miracle of God. Now if we could only get the mother jailed for fraud. Until then, if she is late on a payment, a warrant for her arrest should be issued just as easily as it was for the plaintiff all those years.


4 posted on 03/04/2008 9:09:35 AM PST by Hoodat (Bull Moose Party Member)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MotleyGirl70

Poor kid. Too bad he has to be involved with all these skumbags.


5 posted on 03/04/2008 9:10:15 AM PST by oldvike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MotleyGirl70
Such an order is unusual, but not unique.

Wha?

6 posted on 03/04/2008 9:10:34 AM PST by subterfuge (Obama will NOT get the nomination.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MotleyGirl70

That’s what happens when you boink the same chick that everyone else is boinking.


7 posted on 03/04/2008 9:11:05 AM PST by Eurale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MotleyGirl70

unfortunatly every state is different.

In some states child support only starts once paternaty is established and support is first ordered.

Of course california has serious paternity fraud issues.


8 posted on 03/04/2008 9:12:35 AM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MotleyGirl70

I suspect this is unusual. I remember reading about a judge’s order of child support when it was KNOWN from the start that the child was not that of the ex-husband who was forced to pay.

But I don’t know which of these two sorts of decision is more prevalent.


9 posted on 03/04/2008 9:15:48 AM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MotleyGirl70

“My baby’s daddy” ping.


10 posted on 03/04/2008 9:16:13 AM PST by WOBBLY BOB (Conservatives are to McCain what Charlie Brown is to Lucy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MotleyGirl70
Let me guess...Mr Samuels is a Black male.
White males always get screwed.
13 posted on 03/04/2008 9:19:16 AM PST by blam (Secure the border and enforce the law)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Such an order is unusual, but not unique.

"We have seen it happen before," said Sandra Jarrett of the state's Child Support Recovery Unit.

Usually there is no intent to defraud, Ms. Jarrett said. Mothers who have had relationships with more than one man might not know who the biological father is without a DNA test.

We have seen it happen before?
Usually there is not intent to defraud?

Any guy in this situation that is forced to pay without a paternity test is being defrauded. He is being made to pay without due process. Courts are a party to it if they don't foce the test.

How many times have they seen this before? Once? Twice?

15 posted on 03/04/2008 9:35:12 AM PST by DoughtyOne (We've got Tweedle Dee, Tweedle Dumb & Tweedle Dumber left. Name them in order. I dare ya.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MotleyGirl70

Bookmarking for when I get home from work.


19 posted on 03/04/2008 9:48:47 AM PST by RandallFlagg (Satisfaction was my sin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MotleyGirl70

BTW, I got $109.55 per month.
..
...
.....
neener-neener-neener
;-)


22 posted on 03/04/2008 9:53:33 AM PST by RandallFlagg (Satisfaction was my sin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MotleyGirl70
Ya kinda gotta give kudos to the bio father - he didn’t have to step forward and initiate a paternal test to prove the child was his...and part of the reason he gave was that he felt bad that the other man had to be paying for a child that wasn’t his ... the man whose been paying all these years, willingly signed on for it in the beginning.

Sounds like the only ‘culprit’ here is the mother....and the child at least had two men willing to step up instead of screaming ‘that ain’t MY kid.’

24 posted on 03/04/2008 10:07:24 AM PST by maine-iac7 (",,,but you can't fool all of the people all the time" LINCOLN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MotleyGirl70

When my ex-wife split from her prior husband the courts were amazed he didn’t insist on a paternity test before agreeing to pay child support. In fact they actively discouraged him from making the decision.


26 posted on 03/04/2008 10:38:09 AM PST by SlapHappyPappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MotleyGirl70

Where are our resident FReeper idiots who believe the welfare of the child is more important than the right parent paying support?


27 posted on 03/04/2008 10:55:42 AM PST by Niteranger68 (Where are they hiding Obama’s white half?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MotleyGirl70
might not know who the biological father is without a DNA test.

EVERY child support case should have, as its first step, a DNA test paid for by the parent who's about to get the financial windfall of probably alimony + child support.

Time to clear out this nest of snakes. Too much injustice done under the blindness of not knowing.

29 posted on 03/04/2008 11:31:55 AM PST by HeartlandOfAmerica (Don't blame me - I voted for Fred and am STILL a FredHead!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MotleyGirl70

The saddest part of this kind of thing is the affect on the child. He/she ends up feeling like people care more about money than they do about him/her.


30 posted on 03/04/2008 11:36:40 AM PST by MEGoody (Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MotleyGirl70

Wish I only had to pay $106.06 per month. I’m being bled for more than 12 times as much. I pay more than $14k/year.


32 posted on 03/04/2008 12:00:10 PM PST by zeugma (FedGov has no intention of actually doing anything to secure this nation. It's all a power grab.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MotleyGirl70

Paging Maury Povich ..

and Yes .. Good on that Judge.


34 posted on 03/04/2008 12:09:37 PM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Godspeed ... ICE’s toll-free tip hotline —1-866-DHS-2-ICE ... 9/11 .. Never FoRGeT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson