Posted on 03/02/2008 1:22:18 PM PST by rface
1: | CCC Search Result - Paragraph # 2271 (618 bytes ) preview document matches 1 Since the first century the Church has affirmed the moral evil of every procured abortion. This teaching has not changed and remains unchangeable. Direct abortion, URL: http://www.scborromeo.org/ccc/para/2271.htm |
97% |
2: | CCC Search Result - Paragraph # 2272 (580 bytes ) preview document matches 2 Formal cooperation in an abortion constitutes a grave offense. The Church attaches the canonical penalty of excommunication to this crime against human life. "A URL: http://www.scborromeo.org/ccc/para/2272.htm |
96% |
3: | CCC Search Result - Paragraph # 2322 (290 bytes ) preview document matches 2 From its conception, the child has the right to life. Direct abortion, that is, abortion willed as an end or as a means, is a "criminal" practice (GS 27 § 3), URL: http://www.scborromeo.org/ccc/para/2322.htm |
96% |
4: | CCC Search Result - Paragraph # 2274 (554 bytes ) preview document matches gravely opposed to the moral law when this is done with the thought of possibly inducing an abortion, depending upon the results: a diagnosis must not be the equivalent URL: http://www.scborromeo.org/ccc/para/2274.htm |
Graphic illustrations warning!!
Love - bad
Abortion - Good
Just so I get that straight...
Call me a caveman.
Thank you, oh high and mighty organ of the commie UM School of Journalism, for telling us that most religions favor abortion. Well then, don’t mind me telling you that we are not most religions. We are the one true religion and will fight the scourge of abortion until our last breath! So put that in your sacred womb vacuum and suck on it!
I love it when truly wicked people tell me my religion is wrong. Few things are more affirming of my Faith.
A primitive pro-life faith versus a secular human-sacrificing barbarism. Hmmmm...which one should I go with here?
>> “the idea such tissue is a person is an issue of Catholic superstition and not biological fact”
A person is defined to be a living human being. Maybe the bozo can inform us exactly at which point the fetal tissue transforms into a human.
This is nothing but Catholic bashing and the fool should test his courage on other religions that will not tolerate his aggression.
John Higdon is not listed on the current Faculty directory for the University of Missouri Medical School, Department of Psychology: http://www.umcpsychiatry.com/facultyphone.php
I suppose he has moved on. A search of the Main University of Missouri Faculty directory likewise yielded no matching name either.
As information...
Thank you for this post, best one yet. Oh yes, The Catholic Church will soldier on, and this lonely man will be forgotten.
My first instinct is to be angry, but truly, we all should pray for people like this. He’s obviously unhappy now, being the God hater he is, but, unimaginable grief awaits I’m afraid. Forever is a HELL of a long time, my friends.
Yeah. That's why Dred Scott is still operative and the schools in Little Rock are seperate but equal.
A couple of thoughts: Firstly, can "personhood" itself even fall under the rubric of "biological fact"? "personhood" is a legal definition, not a biological one.
Secondly, granting for the sake of argument that "personhood" could be considered a biological fact, could it also be said that "the idea such tissue is not a person is an issue of secularist superstition and not biological fact."
We've got to do a better job throwing their mud back into their own faces. Their belief system is every bit as much built on faith as the Christian's. Their belief is simply in the ultimace of axiomatic reality itself, whereas the Christian provides a rational basis for that reality (i.e. a God who created for a purpose).
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.