Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Singing starlings: why...boys are being born "girls" (estrogen pollution gender-bending the planet)
Daily Mail (UK) ^ | 27th February 2008 | GEOFFREY LEAN

Posted on 02/28/2008 3:33:10 PM PST by Mrs. Don-o

Next time you hear a starling sing, stop and listen hard. It may well be warning of a peril that endangers the whole world of nature - and the very future of the human race itself.

For scientists have found that gender-bender chemicals - increasingly contaminating the environment, our food, our water and our bodies - are having a bizarre effect on common birds, causing the males to give voice to longer and more complex songs.

This is only the latest in a long series of increasingly urgent alarms being sounded by wildlife against an insidious but devastating danger that threatens our children.

But so far our leaders have steadfastly and scandalously turned a deaf ear to them - and, even more shamefully, ignored the first signs that the peril is already affecting birth patterns, causing thousands of babies who should have been boys to be born as girls instead.

Starlings and their diverse, complicated and mimicking - though not beautiful - songs have long fascinated humanity.

Mozart was entranced by a starling after it copied a tune that the great composer was whistling in a pet store.

Scroll down for more...

Scientists have found that gender-bending chemicals have caused male Starlings to sing longer and more complex songs

Modern scientists have discovered that starlings' songs contain similar patterns to human speech.

But if we could, indeed, understand what they are communicating, we would be wise to take heed.

Scientists at Cardiff University have discovered that the brains of male starlings foraging for worms at a sewage treatment works in South-West England have been subtly changed by being contaminated by oestrogen from the contraceptive pill and hormone replacement therapy (HRT).

The female hormones - present in women's urine, and passing through the sewage treatment unaffected - caused the part of the brain that controls their song to grow much bigger, causing them to sing at greater length and with even more virtuosity than usual.

The study confirms similar, if slightly differing, research on other birds, which scientists say is adding up to some of the first concrete proof of the effects of gender benders on the natural world.

Researchers at the University of California have found that feeding female finches with a hormone used in HRT has caused them to sing, something hitherto done only by their males.

And studies at the University of Alberta have found robins exposed to the pesticide DDT before birth suffered damage to the region of the brain that enables them to sing and protect their territory.

Dr David Crews of the University of Texas calls the research on birdsong "very significant", describing it as "the first step needed to demonstrate a causal link between specific pollutants and the effects on wildlife populations".

Scroll down for more...

Researchers have calculated that 250,000 baby girls should have been born boys in the U.S. and Japan alone

Yet there have been strange warning signs for decades. Way back in the early 1970s, researchers found that female gulls had taken to nesting together all over the U.S., the males having apparently lost interest.

When the bashful males were caught and examined, they were found to have developed female egg-laying canals.

In the 1980s, researchers in Florida found that alligators were failing to reproduce because their males had mysteriously tiny penises; further investigations revealed that they had developed female hormone patterns - and that turtles in the same waters had developed into hermaphrodites.

Most alarming of all, repeated studies by Britain's own Environment Agency have shown that about a third of the male roach in rivers and streams right across the country have begun producing eggs, after developing female sex organs.

Again, the problem was traced to oestrogen passing through sewage works - in some areas, near particularly heavy inflows of treated water, all the males were found to be between sexes.

The findings have inevitably raised concern that people may also be affected, since one-third of the country's drinking water comes from rivers, much of it beneath sewage outfalls.

And, whether or not this is the cause, male sperm counts have been dropping precipitously both here and across the world.

Fertile

Studies in more than 20 countries have shown that average amounts have fallen by well over half in the past 50 years, from an average of more than 150 million per millilitre to 66 million.

The result is that men are now less than half as fertile as hamsters.

The counts are continuing to plunge by two per cent a year, and no end to the decline is in sight. At this rate, the average man will be unable to father children within decades.

Increasingly the sperm crisis is being blamed on a whole host of chemicals, not just synthetic oestrogen, but a wide variety of substances that have become ubiquitous in daily life.

They include the common plastic PVC; dioxins, the notorious pollutants found almost everywhere; PCBs, one-and-a-half million tons of which have been used in countless products from paints to plastics; and phthalates, universally used to make plastics more flexible.

Recent tests by WWF (formerly the World Wildlife Fund) on 14 basic foodstuffs taken from supermarket shelves found that every single one contained PCBs, and most were contaminated by phthalates.

Both substances have been shown to have deeply worrying effects on babies and children.

Scientists at Rotterdam's Erasmus University have found that boys born to mothers exposed to PCBs grew up wanting to play with dolls and tea-sets.

And research at the University of Rochester in New York State has shown that the male children of women exposed to phthalates have smaller penises and other signs of feminisation of their genitals.

Communities exposed to high levels of these and other gender-bender chemicals, from the Great Lakes of North America to the Russian Arctic, have been found to give birth to twice as many girls as boys.

This may offer a clue to the cause of a mysterious shift in the sex of babies worldwide.

Conflict

Normally 106 boys are born for every 100 girls, in what is thought to be nature's way of compensating for the fact that males were more likely to be killed hunting or in conflict.

But increasingly this ratio is slipping - it is calculated that 250,000 babies who would have been boys have been born girls in the U.S. and Japan alone.

You would think that all this accumulating evidence would long since have sparked alarm in governments worldwide.

Far from it. When the EU drew up its first comprehensive controls on chemicals two years ago, it largely exempted gender benders from them.

Britain, under Tony Blair's leadership, was largely responsible for this exemption, and confidential documents show that it obediently acted to water down the controls following direct representations from the Bush administration - almost unbelievably putting the interests of foreign firms above the health of British children.

Since then, as Dr Gwynne Lyons, director of the expert group, CHEM Trust puts it, there has been "regulatory inertia".

That needs to change, and fast. If ministers continue wilfully to refuse to heed the science, they should, at least, listen to the starlings.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: chemicals; endocrinedisruptors; gender; health; homosexualagenda; hormones; medicine; pollution; queer
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 next last
To: MacDorcha
If you google the words

"105 male births to 100 female"

you get 60 results which mostly contain sentences like this: "Most countries report 105 male births to every 100 female." Looks like a basic accepted average to me. Readers are, of coourse, free to glance over this page and form their own generalizations.

21 posted on 02/28/2008 5:15:38 PM PST by Mrs. Don-o (Male and female He created them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o
it implies there's somehing actually wrong, pathological, about gender confusion, and that the solution might involve curbing hormonal contraceptives.

I'm sure that's an accident; they don't realize what they're saying.

I see reports of this kind, too, and also items saying that the use of soy products reduces male testosterone levels ... but yet, I always seem to be pregnant, even though our county water, I'm sure, contains as much estrogen effluent as any other, and Der Prinz and I are largely vegetarian, and in our 40's.

The animal information, though not presented in a format that allows one to evaluate its relevance, is interesting. However, human reproduction rates are so skewed by artificial infertility that I think it's almost impossible to determine whether "natural" fertility is declining.

22 posted on 02/28/2008 6:01:06 PM PST by Tax-chick (If there's a bustle in your hedgerow, don't shoot! It might be a lemur!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o
Alligators with shriveled penises! Starling males with warbles and giggles! Hormonal angst amongst the amphibians! Freaky effeminate fish!

Female hormones widespread throughout the environment might also plausibly explain why so many of our country's current "leaders" appear to have no nuts in their scrotums.

23 posted on 02/28/2008 6:16:51 PM PST by E. Cartman (Huckaboob will never be Vice President.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: buffyt
Well I knew a girl when I was growing up in the 1950s who was born both male and female. Since then I have known two more. I knew a girl who was born without a uterus. I knew a girl who was born with TWO

I'm relieved you don't know me (grins)
24 posted on 02/28/2008 6:50:39 PM PST by RedMonqey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o

It seems to be the general count for the “civilized” cultures... for the last few decades.

I’m sticking by my guns- I have heard otherwise, and will remain skeptical as such.


25 posted on 02/28/2008 6:53:26 PM PST by MacDorcha (Arm yourself!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o; Elpasser

could be why billions of viagra & levitra prescriptions have been filled.


26 posted on 02/28/2008 7:30:26 PM PST by Coleus (Abortion and Euthanasia, Don't Democrats just kill ya?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o

Alligators with shriveled penises... Oh My!

Starling males with warbles and giggles... Oh My!

Hormonal angst amongst the amphibians... Oh My!

27 posted on 02/28/2008 7:44:54 PM PST by Barnacle (Reagan Republicanism R.I.P.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MacDorcha
but then, sometimes you flip a coin and get nothing but “heads” for 20 flips.

True enough, but just to be a little more precise, let's replace "sometimes" with "about one time in a million."

28 posted on 02/28/2008 8:20:19 PM PST by Zero Sum (Liberalism: The damage ends up being a thousand times the benefit! (apologies to Rabbi Benny Lau))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o

You can even argue that higher population densities will result in larger concentrations of of endogenous human hormones in the environment. During pregnancy, women discharge large quantities of estrogens and progestins in their urine. The progesterone is a known androgen blocker.

Androgen blockers can result in inhibition of genital formation in male fetuses. Animal experiments have also shown, androgen blockers can prevent the masculization of the brain in male fetuses.


29 posted on 02/28/2008 9:42:00 PM PST by punster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o

There is also another reason some XY fetus are girls: Androgen Insensitivity Syndrome. Though these girls are XY, they are still female. They look female, they act female, and they have a female gender identity. In the case of partial androgen insensitivity, they may have varying degrees of masculinization of the genitals. The mild forms are suggested as a significant factor in male infertility. The cause is genetic, damage to the androgen receptor (AR) gene located at Xq11-Xq12 on the X chromosome.

Other conditions include complete gonadal agenesis. The genotype is missing the SRY region on the Y chromosome. These individuals are XY, but they also have a uterus and fallopian tubes. It is possible for them to become pregnant by artificial insemination.

There are also XX males. Why? This happens because the SRY region of the Y chromosome has translocated to the X chromosome. They are XX, but they are fertile males, producing sperm.

It does seem there are a lot of reasons why sex and gender are not a straight-forward dichotomy.


30 posted on 02/28/2008 9:55:56 PM PST by punster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wideawake

I am very glad I live in Colorado. We are upstream from everywhere.


31 posted on 02/28/2008 10:22:57 PM PST by Dumb_Ox (http://kevinjjones.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Barnacle

Toto, I don’t think we’re in Kansas anymore.


32 posted on 02/29/2008 5:10:48 AM PST by Mrs. Don-o (Toto, I don't think we're in Kansas anymore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: punster

How ‘bout 50 million women on hormonal patches, implants, and oc’s peeing into the wastewater management system every day?


33 posted on 02/29/2008 5:12:56 AM PST by Mrs. Don-o (Toto, I don't think we're in Kansas anymore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: punster

Thanks for the info. In fact, always ping me to this kind of discusion, if you will. I am interested in the disorders which lead to sexual malfunction and/or gender dysphoria.


34 posted on 02/29/2008 5:15:03 AM PST by Mrs. Don-o (Toto, I don't think we're in Kansas anymore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o

Thank God I’m 55.


35 posted on 02/29/2008 5:17:32 AM PST by glide625
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o

That adds to the burden of compounds, with steroidal activity, entering the waste water stream.


36 posted on 02/29/2008 6:11:48 AM PST by punster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o

More Rachel Carson hysteria!

Or we going to become extinct in less than five years now(it was ten according to the AlGoracle, but now it’s only five)?

It’s important for me to know, because I have to decide whether to get a 30 yr. or a 40 yr. mortgage.


37 posted on 02/29/2008 6:14:17 AM PST by exit82 (People get the government they deserve. And they are about to get it--in spades.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o
How ‘bout 50 million women on hormonal patches, implants, and oc’s peeing into the wastewater management system every day?

Next time the Greenpeace guy works the corner by my office and asks if I want to help the environment, I'm going to ask him what he thinks of this.

Usually I tell him I did my part to save the planet when I switched from bottled beer to draft.

38 posted on 02/29/2008 10:26:41 AM PST by nina0113 (If fences don't work, why does the White House have one?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: exit82
"More Rachel Carson hysteria!"

No, tisn't.

She didn't have the research, didn't do the math. Frankly, as a scientist she was deficient.

There's lots out there about rising levels of (mostly male) sexual dysfunction, subfertility and and dysphoria, not just in humans but in birds, fish, amphibians, even ungulates. That's a fact.

In addition-- not fact, but speculation on my part --- the eco-establishment is NOT going to react to this in a big way, because they tend to see the de-masculinization and reproductive decline of the human race as a good thing.

I don't. I know sexually disordered males in my own family who are suffering. See #12 for a larger survey of concern. Therefore I take this as something we need to look into.

39 posted on 02/29/2008 11:57:46 AM PST by Mrs. Don-o (Toto, I don't think we're in Kansas anymore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o
"most were contaminated by phthalates"

And in other news, pthallic resudues affect phthalluses.

Full Disclosure: The author has a PhD in Chemical Physics. Don't try puns like this at home.

Cheers!

40 posted on 03/01/2008 10:00:52 AM PST by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson