Skip to comments.
Calm Down On The Housing Thing
The Uncommon Sense Blog ^
| 2/27/08
| Dan Taylor
Posted on 02/27/2008 1:04:29 PM PST by slackattack19
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-37 next last
To: slackattack19
LOL!! LOL!!! Where did this writer get his advanced degrees in real estate!!!
2
posted on
02/27/2008 1:09:16 PM PST
by
org.whodat
(What's the difference between a Democrat and a republican????)
To: slackattack19
Roughly 30% of the potential buyers in the world for US Real Estate will come from Europe and the Middle East over the next ten years. Buying the houses that Americans can't buy?
To: slackattack19
Real estate has never been cheaper in the US. It has never been more available in the US. It has never been more accessible by the rest of the world than right now. Roughly 30% of the potential buyers in the world for US Real Estate will come from Europe and the Middle East over the next ten years. Think they know something we've forgotten? I throw a huge BS flag. Real Estate is STILL massively expensive. It needs to drop a minimum of another 25% to even get back to historical ranges. Europe and the ME are in their own soon to be popping RE bubbles. They ain't coming.
PS - what are historical norms?
1. 100 x monthly rent = cost of the house
2. 2.5-3.0 x yearly gross income = cost of the house
3. 40% (MAX) monthly take home pay should equal cost of monthly carrying costs of the house (PI, taxes, utilities, upkeep)
We are SO not there yet...
4
posted on
02/27/2008 1:13:26 PM PST
by
2banana
(My common ground with terrorists - they want to die for islam and we want to kill them)
To: slackattack19
Real estate has never been cheaper in the US Wow, that IS good news, does that mean I can buy my first home like my parents had, including the $28 mortgage payment?
5
posted on
02/27/2008 1:13:58 PM PST
by
SF Republican
(Conservatives wanted all or nothing, and they got it.)
To: slackattack19
Nobody is buying, nobody is selling. Just sit and wait. Except those whose payments have increased for some unknown reason to more than their income. They’ll dump you out into the snow at 40 below on the marge of Lake Lebarge.
6
posted on
02/27/2008 1:14:15 PM PST
by
RightWhale
(Clam down! avoid ataque de nervosa)
To: slackattack19
The good people need to band together and sue the banks that loaned them the money that they didn't understand everything about. The bad people need to understand the speculation has it's risks. Oh, if only they had been given something to read before they signed the mortgage they could have avoided this... no, wait, they could have just read the mortgage before signing it. Sorry, not feeling much sympathy right now for people who got zero down interest only ARMs.
7
posted on
02/27/2008 1:14:56 PM PST
by
KarlInOhio
(Rattenschadenfreude: joy at a Democrat's pain, especially Hillary's pain caused by Obama.)
To: slackattack19
I was in Ft. Myers last Fall and three major builders were running full page 30-50% off sales.
30-50% off of 150%-200% inflated prices isn't exactly a 'deal'. Regardless of the 'deals', people still aren't buying, which means that the prices still have to come down, possibly to lower than the costs of building; which is only more damaging to an economy because it makes builders less likely to build in the present, and in the future if they can't make a decent return on their investment.
When the stock market is down, I'm all for buying because the stock market truly only continues to go up. When you're paying inflating prices for housing, it takes a long time to recoup that investment.
8
posted on
02/27/2008 1:15:49 PM PST
by
Adammon
To: slackattack19
House inventory is the same situation as a car lot. I quit reading there.
9
posted on
02/27/2008 1:16:39 PM PST
by
steve86
(Acerbic by nature, not nurtureā¢)
To: slackattack19
What he really fails to mention, purposely, is that it is much harder to get a loan - even for qualified buyers. Also, with more inventory, less sales take place, and finding comparable sales for a real estate appraisal (if the property is financed) continue to dwindle. This all makes for appraising a home at a sales value more and more difficult.
10
posted on
02/27/2008 1:17:10 PM PST
by
illiac
(If we don't change directions soon, we'll get where we're going)
To: 2banana
11
posted on
02/27/2008 1:20:55 PM PST
by
griswold3
(Al queda is guilty of hirabah (war against society) Penalty is death.)
To: 2banana
1. 100 x monthly rent = cost of the house
2. 2.5-3.0 x yearly gross income = cost of the house
3. 40% (MAX) monthly take home pay should equal cost of monthly carrying costs of the house (PI, taxes, utilities, upkeep) Used these when I bought, weirded out my search realtor.
Never have had trouble making a payment.
12
posted on
02/27/2008 1:23:50 PM PST
by
fireforeffect
(A kind word and a 2x4, gets you more than just a kind word.)
To: 2banana
Your numbers are out of whack. If you suppose that a 3 BR house with 2 baths in a nicer area is going to rent for $1,400 per month with a yard and some parking that house is supposed to be worth only $140K? If you can get $17K per year in cash from the place and pay out only $8.5K in mortgage and interest, not to mention getting depreciation benefits that reduce your taxable profit to only $5K, with even a 3% appreciation rate per year it’s a killer investment with 20% down on the property.
13
posted on
02/27/2008 1:25:07 PM PST
by
misterrob
(There is no such thing as a RINO.....CINO on the other hand has meaning.)
To: SF Republican
My parents first home in 1954 cost $14k - it was a small 3 br 1 ba tract house, probably only about 900 sf. Formica counters, each room was small, bathroom was about as big as someone standing upright. I think their payment was about 68 a month on a 20 yr loan. Of course my father was only making about $2400 a year.
Tell me, what do we consider a typical starter homes today, and at what salary level ?
Today’s starter salaries are at least 10x or more what they were in 1954, so 10x the house cost is not necessarily unreasonable. Add in the oversized starter house at about 3x what it was in 1954 and there’s your answer.
14
posted on
02/27/2008 1:33:32 PM PST
by
cinives
(On some planets what I do is considered normal.)
To: misterrob
Here is one I just ran:
Monthly Rental Amount $2,400.00
Percent of Year Unoccupied 5%
Annual Cash Flow (minus vacancy) of $27,360.00
Property Acquisition Cost $300,000.00
Less Down Payment - Cash In $60,000.00
Amount of the loan $240,000.00
Payment Monthly Principal/Interest $1,556.64
Annual Insurance Cost $1,200.00 (LOW BALL)
Annual Taxes $1,400.00 (LOW BALL)
Annual Repairs Budget $600.00 (LOW BALL)
Percent of Rent Mgmt Fee of 6%
These expenses total to Annual Cash Out of $23,521.28
Income of $27,360 minus cost of $23,521 = $3839 cash return over cash out
$3839 divided by cash investment of $60,000 = Rental Yield of 6.4%
This assumes some appreciation for the loss of the $60,000 down payment and that you have decent renters.
15
posted on
02/27/2008 1:35:59 PM PST
by
2banana
(My common ground with terrorists - they want to die for islam and we want to kill them)
To: slackattack19
I just moved my son from San Diego to Pocatello. His real estate firm was located in the Eastlake development of Chula Vista. About half the houses there have never been sold or occupied. The contractors continue to build to comply with their contracts. Lots of unsold, unwanted housing. Property values are dropping and lots of buyers are upside down. Many are on their way to foreclosure. My son went from $8K/month to having difficulty feeding himself. Transactions were taking so long that buyers, sellers and finance companies became impatient and terminated them. Lots of work for my son's agents, but he doesn't get paid unless the transactions close. Getting away from that dysfunctional market was necessary.
16
posted on
02/27/2008 1:40:41 PM PST
by
Myrddin
To: 2banana
I’m in your camp, that SFH homes do not cashflow.
But I might add, you’re also forgetting the foregone interest on the $60K down payment at whatever interest rate you’d like to use...roughly another $2K a year even at today’s poor rates.
17
posted on
02/27/2008 1:50:50 PM PST
by
Attention Surplus Disorder
(We've checked, and all your zeroes are OK. We're still working on your ones.)
To: SF Republican
There are available homes for sale in my region, but I can’t see where their advertised price has been reduced. They are offering some help on closing costs and maybe taking offers that aren’t necessarily known, but I can’t see much difference in pricing.
18
posted on
02/27/2008 1:57:27 PM PST
by
elpadre
To: 2banana
Rental housing is seldom profitable in itself. You can make money on it, but usually only in a rising real estate market.
I.e., let’s say you manage to break even for ten years, and then sell for double what you paid.
But that’s clearly not a good bet today.
19
posted on
02/27/2008 2:00:59 PM PST
by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: slackattack19
20
posted on
02/27/2008 2:04:36 PM PST
by
2ndDivisionVet
(http://www.fourfriedchickensandacoke.blogspot.com)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-37 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson