Posted on 02/24/2008 11:41:11 AM PST by SFC Chromey
In a ceremony that received virtually no attention in the American media, the United States and Canada signed a military agreement Feb. 14 allowing the armed forces from one nation to support the armed forces of the other nation during a domestic civil emergency, even one that does not involve a cross-border crisis.
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
European nations have been pretty good at maintaining their individuality(Muslim immigration aside) while still combining to become an economic force to rival the U.S.. It would make sense that the powers that be would look to give our hemisphere the economic strength to remain number one.
Reporter 'A' writes a whole series of stories how pedophiles recruit in men's rooms. Then, Reporter 'A' provides a "FACTUAL" story how politician 'B' just went into a men's room.
I do not understand your denying that this is actually happening though AmericasUnited.
George Washington doesn’t think I was speeding...what say you? ;-)
No, read it right here in Ronald Reagan's speech when he announced his candidacy on November 13,1979:
We live on a continent whose three countries possess the assets to make it the strongest, most prosperous and self-sufficient area on Earth. Within the borders of this North American continent are the food, resources, technology and undeveloped territory which, properly managed, could dramatically improve the quality of life of all its inhabitants.
It is no accident that this unmatched potential for progress and prosperity exists in three countries with such long-standing heritages of free government. A developing closeness among Canada, Mexico and the United States--a North American accord--would permit achievement of that potential in each country beyond that which I believe any of them--strong as they are--could accomplish in the absence of such cooperation. In fact, the key to our own future security may lie in both Mexico and Canada becoming much stronger countries than they are today.
No one can say at this point precisely what form future cooperation among our three countries will take. But if I am elected President, I would be willing to invite each of our neighbors to send a special representative to our government to sit in on high level planning sessions with us, as partners, mutually concerned about the future of our continent. First, I would immediately seek the views and ideas of Canadian and Mexican leaders on this issue, and work tirelessly with them to develop closer ties among our peoples. It is time we stopped thinking of our nearest neighbors as foreigners.
By developing methods of working closely together, we will lay the foundations for future cooperation on a broader and more significant scale. We will put to rest any doubts of those cynical enough to believe that the United States would seek to dominate any relationship among our three countries, or foolish enough to think that the governments and peoples of Canada and Mexico would ever permit such domination to occur. I for one, am confident that we can show the world by example that the nations of North America are ready, within the context of an unswerving commitment to freedom, to see new forms of accommodation to meet a changing world. A developing closeness between the United States, Canada and Mexico would serve notice on friends and foe alike that we were prepared for a long haul, looking outward again and confident of our future; that together we are going to create jobs, to generate new fortunes of wealth for many and provide a legacy for the children of each of our countries. Two hundred years ago, we taught the world that a new form of government, created out of the genius of man to cope with his circumstances, could succeed in bringing a measure of quality to human life previously thought impossible.
Now let us work toward the goal of using the assets of this continent, its resources, technology, and foodstuffs in the most efficient ways possible for the common good of all its people. It may take the next 100 years but we can dare to dream that at some future date a map of the world might show the North American continent as one in which the people's commerce of its three strong countries flow more freely across their present borders than they do today.
Where did I do that?
There is a great deal of information that, after reading, one cannot come to any other conclusion than the fact that this government, over time, has been and continues to work toward, meshing together three sovereign territories...and, by necessity, incrementally eliminating the sovereignty/independence of each.
Other people/organizations, perhaps more credible to you, come out and can be read from: the Council on Foreign Relations, the conservative Eagle Forum, Judicial Watch, and even thomas.gov (for various bills proposed/passed).
Are you referring to me as one of your “doubters”?
Ronald Reagan gave the non-kook reasons (see post #45) why we should work closer together.
Agreed. If people would actually read the documents for themselves, they would see there is definitely more to it than what .gov is admitting.
Just checked. There are four black helicopter parked at the Guard Armory across the way. Quite visible in broad day light.
Have you read the information and documents?
I suspect not.
Get back to me once you have. Up until then, “calling names” or dismissing it all outright ain’t gonna fly.
the truth is that there could be a case one day where Canadian troops shoot Americans who are rioting , for one reason or another, and there is also could be a case of American soldiers killing Canadians who are rioting for one reason or another. This would seem to be an obvious fact. It doesn't mean its going to happen but the concerns of those wanting soldiers and police bound by the laws of the Constitution are very valid and not conspiratorial.
I admit I enjoy a good conspiracy thread. In fact I spend time on some web sites of that ilk when not here. The moon landing one that stopped me cold was the assertion that the backpack the Apollo guys wore will not fit through the door on the LEM when on a man. The Smithsonian and NASA have refused (as far as I can tell) all requests to test the remaining units to see if this is true.
This account has been banned or suspended
My bad. I meant Hilbama and McCain.
lol.....
lol
Just thought you’d be interested to know you won’t be getting a response, hehehe
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.