It's not what has he reported in this article when taken as a single event. It what he has reported when taken as a whole.
Reporter 'A' writes a whole series of stories how pedophiles recruit in men's rooms. Then, Reporter 'A' provides a "FACTUAL" story how politician 'B' just went into a men's room.
You mean, you only disagree with conclusions he has reached after reading all the evidence, so to speak. But have YOU read everything that he's read concerning this matter? He has read a substantial amount of material; I have as well, though likely far less than he. I independently reach similar conclusions by just reading the information I have....independent of HIS articles. On my home page, I have various articles and documents I've read, in addition to others I have not posted on my homepage, which includes bills proposed and/or passed concerning funding of various things such as securing MEXICO's southern border with American taxpayer dollars (but we "can't" secure our own); as well as organizations and a banking system implemented for and between the US and Mexico; infrastructure being built WITHIN MEXICO, again, with AMERICAN taxpayer dollars....etc., etc.
There is a great deal of information that, after reading, one cannot come to any other conclusion than the fact that this government, over time, has been and continues to work toward, meshing together three sovereign territories...and, by necessity, incrementally eliminating the sovereignty/independence of each.
Other people/organizations, perhaps more credible to you, come out and can be read from: the Council on Foreign Relations, the conservative Eagle Forum, Judicial Watch, and even thomas.gov (for various bills proposed/passed).