Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

N. American Army created without OK by Congress-U.S., Canada military ink deal to fight...
WorldNetDaily.com ^ | 24 February 2008 | Jerome R. Corsi and Tim Bueler

Posted on 02/24/2008 11:41:11 AM PST by SFC Chromey

In a ceremony that received virtually no attention in the American media, the United States and Canada signed a military agreement Feb. 14 allowing the armed forces from one nation to support the armed forces of the other nation during a domestic civil emergency, even one that does not involve a cross-border crisis.

(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...


TOPICS: Canada; Government
KEYWORDS: 110th; allies; allycanada; nationalsecurity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last
To: AmericaUnited
To deny that there is a plan to merge the Americas into a economic force and probably a military force to rival the EU and China is not black helicopter stuff. It seems very logical giving the world we live in today.

European nations have been pretty good at maintaining their individuality(Muslim immigration aside) while still combining to become an economic force to rival the U.S.. It would make sense that the powers that be would look to give our hemisphere the economic strength to remain number one.

41 posted on 02/24/2008 3:40:28 PM PST by normy (Don't take it personally, just take it seriously.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: nicmarlo
It's not what has he reported in this article when taken as a single event. It what he has reported when taken as a whole.

Reporter 'A' writes a whole series of stories how pedophiles recruit in men's rooms. Then, Reporter 'A' provides a "FACTUAL" story how politician 'B' just went into a men's room.

42 posted on 02/24/2008 3:40:53 PM PST by AmericaUnited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: AmericaUnited
I don't really see a problem with competing with the EU and China by combining the economic power of the nations in our hemisphere.

I do not understand your denying that this is actually happening though AmericasUnited.

43 posted on 02/24/2008 3:44:49 PM PST by normy (Don't take it personally, just take it seriously.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch

George Washington doesn’t think I was speeding...what say you? ;-)


44 posted on 02/24/2008 3:45:03 PM PST by Xenophon450 (I guess I'll never know, some things under the sun can never be understood...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: normy
To deny that there is a plan to merge the Americas into a economic force and probably a military force to rival the EU and China is not black helicopter stuff.

No, read it right here in Ronald Reagan's speech when he announced his candidacy on November 13,1979:

We live on a continent whose three countries possess the assets to make it the strongest, most prosperous and self-sufficient area on Earth. Within the borders of this North American continent are the food, resources, technology and undeveloped territory which, properly managed, could dramatically improve the quality of life of all its inhabitants.

It is no accident that this unmatched potential for progress and prosperity exists in three countries with such long-standing heritages of free government. A developing closeness among Canada, Mexico and the United States--a North American accord--would permit achievement of that potential in each country beyond that which I believe any of them--strong as they are--could accomplish in the absence of such cooperation. In fact, the key to our own future security may lie in both Mexico and Canada becoming much stronger countries than they are today.

No one can say at this point precisely what form future cooperation among our three countries will take. But if I am elected President, I would be willing to invite each of our neighbors to send a special representative to our government to sit in on high level planning sessions with us, as partners, mutually concerned about the future of our continent. First, I would immediately seek the views and ideas of Canadian and Mexican leaders on this issue, and work tirelessly with them to develop closer ties among our peoples. It is time we stopped thinking of our nearest neighbors as foreigners.

By developing methods of working closely together, we will lay the foundations for future cooperation on a broader and more significant scale. We will put to rest any doubts of those cynical enough to believe that the United States would seek to dominate any relationship among our three countries, or foolish enough to think that the governments and peoples of Canada and Mexico would ever permit such domination to occur. I for one, am confident that we can show the world by example that the nations of North America are ready, within the context of an unswerving commitment to freedom, to see new forms of accommodation to meet a changing world. A developing closeness between the United States, Canada and Mexico would serve notice on friends and foe alike that we were prepared for a long haul, looking outward again and confident of our future; that together we are going to create jobs, to generate new fortunes of wealth for many and provide a legacy for the children of each of our countries. Two hundred years ago, we taught the world that a new form of government, created out of the genius of man to cope with his circumstances, could succeed in bringing a measure of quality to human life previously thought impossible.

Now let us work toward the goal of using the assets of this continent, its resources, technology, and foodstuffs in the most efficient ways possible for the common good of all its people. It may take the next 100 years but we can dare to dream that at some future date a map of the world might show the North American continent as one in which the people's commerce of its three strong countries flow more freely across their present borders than they do today.

45 posted on 02/24/2008 3:45:43 PM PST by AmericaUnited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: nicmarlo
These same doubters wouldn’t vote for Newt Gingrich because he was divorced. They didn’t like Thompson because his heart wasn’t in it. They don’t like Tancredo because he’s a johnny one note. They don’t like Hunter because he’s, ahh, he’s, ahh....unelectable. They don’t like Allen Keyes because all he talks about is abortion. yada yada yada. Now we have our choices THEY PICKED, Obama and McCain. Now these same people won’t listen to a talk radio host even looking at the news article and knowing its true. These are the same people that crap on Rush Limbaugh because he got hooked on Oxycontin. Just because he had a problem doesn’t make everything that comes out of his mouth a lie. He’s STILL the best thing conservatives ever had. This is the same syndrome the schools have saying Washington was bad because he owned slaves.
46 posted on 02/24/2008 3:47:14 PM PST by chuckles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: normy
I don't really see a problem with competing with the EU and China by combining the economic power of the nations in our hemisphere. I do not understand your denying that this is actually happening though AmericasUnited.

Where did I do that?

47 posted on 02/24/2008 3:47:16 PM PST by AmericaUnited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: AmericaUnited
You mean, you only disagree with conclusions he has reached after reading all the evidence, so to speak. But have YOU read everything that he's read concerning this matter? He has read a substantial amount of material; I have as well, though likely far less than he. I independently reach similar conclusions by just reading the information I have....independent of HIS articles. On my home page, I have various articles and documents I've read, in addition to others I have not posted on my homepage, which includes bills proposed and/or passed concerning funding of various things such as securing MEXICO's southern border with American taxpayer dollars (but we "can't" secure our own); as well as organizations and a banking system implemented for and between the US and Mexico; infrastructure being built WITHIN MEXICO, again, with AMERICAN taxpayer dollars....etc., etc.

There is a great deal of information that, after reading, one cannot come to any other conclusion than the fact that this government, over time, has been and continues to work toward, meshing together three sovereign territories...and, by necessity, incrementally eliminating the sovereignty/independence of each.

Other people/organizations, perhaps more credible to you, come out and can be read from: the Council on Foreign Relations, the conservative Eagle Forum, Judicial Watch, and even thomas.gov (for various bills proposed/passed).

48 posted on 02/24/2008 3:48:28 PM PST by nicmarlo (A vote for McRino is a false mandate for McShamnesty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: chuckles

Are you referring to me as one of your “doubters”?


49 posted on 02/24/2008 3:49:45 PM PST by AmericaUnited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: nicmarlo

Ronald Reagan gave the non-kook reasons (see post #45) why we should work closer together.


50 posted on 02/24/2008 3:51:14 PM PST by AmericaUnited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: chuckles
This is the same syndrome the schools have saying Washington was bad because he owned slaves.

Agreed. If people would actually read the documents for themselves, they would see there is definitely more to it than what .gov is admitting.

51 posted on 02/24/2008 3:53:09 PM PST by nicmarlo (A vote for McRino is a false mandate for McShamnesty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: AmericaUnited

Just checked. There are four black helicopter parked at the Guard Armory across the way. Quite visible in broad day light.


52 posted on 02/24/2008 3:53:27 PM PST by mad_as_he$$ (John McCain - The Manchurian Candidate? http://www.usvetdsp.com/manchuan.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: AmericaUnited

Have you read the information and documents?

I suspect not.

Get back to me once you have. Up until then, “calling names” or dismissing it all outright ain’t gonna fly.


53 posted on 02/24/2008 3:54:26 PM PST by nicmarlo (A vote for McRino is a false mandate for McShamnesty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: AmericaUnited
It seems like your implying that anyone against such actions are conspiracy theorists and nut jobs. The fact is this is happening and will only become more and more obvious as time goes by. It would make more sense to me to argue on the benefits of moves like this rather than insinuate those against these actions are nuts or crazy because they see whats happening.

the truth is that there could be a case one day where Canadian troops shoot Americans who are rioting , for one reason or another, and there is also could be a case of American soldiers killing Canadians who are rioting for one reason or another. This would seem to be an obvious fact. It doesn't mean its going to happen but the concerns of those wanting soldiers and police bound by the laws of the Constitution are very valid and not conspiratorial.

54 posted on 02/24/2008 3:54:37 PM PST by normy (Don't take it personally, just take it seriously.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: North American Union
No biggee. April 19, 2011 Skynet goes online. April 21 it becomes self aware - Judgment Day.
55 posted on 02/24/2008 3:55:11 PM PST by mad_as_he$$ (John McCain - The Manchurian Candidate? http://www.usvetdsp.com/manchuan.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: UCFRoadWarrior

I admit I enjoy a good conspiracy thread. In fact I spend time on some web sites of that ilk when not here. The moon landing one that stopped me cold was the assertion that the backpack the Apollo guys wore will not fit through the door on the LEM when on a man. The Smithsonian and NASA have refused (as far as I can tell) all requests to test the remaining units to see if this is true.


56 posted on 02/24/2008 3:59:06 PM PST by mad_as_he$$ (John McCain - The Manchurian Candidate? http://www.usvetdsp.com/manchuan.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: mad_as_he$$

This account has been banned or suspended


57 posted on 02/24/2008 4:14:07 PM PST by nicmarlo (A vote for McRino is a false mandate for McShamnesty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Chewbacca

My bad. I meant Hilbama and McCain.


58 posted on 02/24/2008 4:24:37 PM PST by Tiemieshooz (First round is on me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: nicmarlo

lol.....


59 posted on 02/24/2008 4:27:49 PM PST by mad_as_he$$ (John McCain - The Manchurian Candidate? http://www.usvetdsp.com/manchuan.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: mad_as_he$$

lol

Just thought you’d be interested to know you won’t be getting a response, hehehe


60 posted on 02/24/2008 4:29:04 PM PST by nicmarlo (A vote for McRino is a false mandate for McShamnesty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson