Anti-truth, anti-freedom, anti-individual, anti-life collectives and individuals are likely to join forces.
Yes, it is too bad that,
instead of advancing toward defining what the actual threat IS - ISLAM,
we’re retreating from “Islamic extremism” to “extremism”.
It’s not even “extremist” Muslims that are the problem, it’s ISLAM ITSELF.
You won’t find any Muslim that will denounce violent jihad to convert/subjugate the world, because that’s the core of Islam and to denounce it is apostasy and death.
This piece hits the nail right on the head...one of the costs of freedom and liberty is eternal vigilance...well stated...
Mark for later read
Examine the history of the Crusades.
They were almost successful in seizing Europe once before.
Reader’s Digest scenario:
- Hillary or Obama win and pull out of Iraq.
- AQ & Iran fill the vacuum in Iraq and begin absorbing Iraqi oil revenues.
- Iran uses their nuclear weapons to blackmail the West into further retreat in the Middle East.
- Europe quickly agrees to concessions.
- The U.S. pulls back support for Israel.
- You choose (A) or (B);
(A) Under threat of attack, Israel NUKES Iran....
(B) Russia & China back Iran and overwhelm Israel, while the U.S. stands back chiding Israel for not having “negotiated”....
We ignore at our peril the insidious creeping of Islam into all the corners of the earth.
We are appeasing and apologizing ourselves to our own demise. Our cultures mean nothing to the Islamofascists other than a source of wealth to be plundered and infidels to be converted, enslaved or killed. There is no negotiating with Islam. The muslims work from their own playbook, the quran, as given them by their delusional prophet some 1400 years ago. Nothing has changed for Islam, still living in the seventh century. Their stated goal is the global caliphate, the extension of Islam as the sole belief system in the world. Their methods are jihad, terrorism and gaming the very systems they seek to destroy; counting on our sense of fairness and compassion to allow their cancer to gain a foothold in formerly free societies.
The PC multi-culti crowd continues its incessant stroll into oblivion, choosing to ignore the fact that the majority of their inclusive lifestyles will be among the first targeted for destruction by a ruling Islamic theocracy, should that come to pass.
It’s time to become a little less tolerant, and a whole lot safer.
One of the best things you can do for the upcoming election is buy a copy of one of Spencer’s books, Say the Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam and the Crusades, and pass it on to an independent friend or a young one that is on the fence or leaning Obama . . . without talking about Presidential politics at all when you do it. They’ll be much more receptive to McCain’s message not to cut and run if they read it.
BUMP!
The author is exactly right. Political Correctness has already closed the debate. Unless this is somehow overcome, we are finished and "liberty" will eventually become universal "submission" to Allah.
Our Founding Fathers would be appalled at the state to which their legacy has degenerated. Every passing year our country resembles more the ancient Biblical Kingdom of Israel than the newly minted 13 United States of America!
One of the big problem conservatives have is that they usually talk in terms of “stopping” some advancing problem, instead of “turning back” that problem.
In this case, “no more Sharia” is little help to those who have recently been placed under its sway, and suffer accordingly. Instead, pressure needs to be brought to bear first, to liberate those who do not want to be ruled by Sharia, and second, to consign Sharia as so inferior to the secular law of the land in all ways, that it has no value.
Typically, the chain of reason should follow the principles of western law:
1) Inferior laws might add to superior secular laws in conformity with those laws, but they cannot contradict, supersede or subtract from them. And,
2) Contracts must fully obey all secular contract law, and any additions must both conform to, *and be in the format of*, secular contract law.
This second provision is just as important, as it requires language and format conformity. This means that a contract court will not need for the contract to be “interpreted” to understand any subtleties or complexities unique to the religion or mutual understanding. That it will be clear and interpretable by the contract experts and attorneys of a secular court.
That means no “poetic license”, no religious references, no Islamic precedent, no fatwas. If it says it in black and white, with proper punctuation, the *letter* of the contract is all that matters. The *spirit* is meaningless.
Under such restrictions, Sharia law is superfluous.
It replaces some archaic statement like, “By the first Moon, the parrot shall be invested in the happy camel”, with something like, “In 28 days from the official date of this contract, party of the first part will deliver by bank check payment for the four (4) specified Potrzebies, after quality inspection and acceptance, to the party of the second part, to the amount of $15,327.88(USD).”
btt
If we had not kowtowed to the mighty oil weapon instead of removing it, the moral bankruptcy of Sharia law would have become apparent long since.
As it is we have steadily conceded the use of a legal system that has not progressed since the 600’s and its expansion when but for the one-crop economy of oil it would have long since been forced to modify into the modern world. And Senator McCain, the “maverick” now seems to be swallowing the conventional wisdom instead of leading us into doing something about it.