Fossilized French Feathers
GGG Ping.
Cool. Thanks Bill.
Thanks Blam.
PS: I tried to resist my urge to imply that these were feathers from 100 million year old ancestors. Sorry. :O)
Fossilized French Feathers
Couldn't resist. I was just reading about the possible fabricator of the original Missing Link (human and ape bones put together), the French Jesuit Fr. Teilhard de Chardin, in 1908 or so. He is also suspected of being behind the similarly dubious "Pekin Man," whose remains were said to be lost in the War.
A modernist who hated Catholic teaching (and had several mistresses), Teilhard may have hatched the plot to find a transitional species in order to prove that man was descended from apes.
|
|
|||
Gods |
Thanks Blam. Amber is fossilized tree resin. And these "feathers" look like pine needles. Weird coincidence. :') |
||
|
· Mirabilis · Texas AM Anthropology News · Yahoo Anthro & Archaeo · · History or Science & Nature Podcasts · Excerpt, or Link only? · cgk's list of ping lists · |
|||
Evidently, for these kids, split ends were all the rage.
“The alternative theory of the evolution of flight, bearing in mind that the structures associated with flight would have been very poorly developed at first, was that birds took to the trees for safety.
From there, it was a relatively small step to developing gliding skills and then the ability to fly.”
What a gigantic crock! They flew up into the trees, and then they learned to glide, which led naturally to flying. Just more ludicrous circuitous reasoning by the crackpots who pose as biologists.
Want to know when Carl Sagan started believing in God and Creation? After 5 seconds in Hell!
Now, the gays are going back to feather boas.
How did they confirm that the amber was 100 million years old?
Was it because it was found close to a fossil that was
supposed to be 100 million years old, or did they
use radiometric dating? How good is radiometric dating
on organic matter? I mean, what were the concentrations of
the mother atoms vs. the daughter atoms in a plant secretion
supposed to be? Does modern amber have the same ratio?...
Also, if the first bird or archeopteryx is 150 million years
old as the article states how is it that one can find
a “primitive” feather at 100 million years old?
I would guess it might prove the de-evolution of the
feather, if anything.Oh well....I’ll have to read the article...I hope I am
a bit more satisfied than when I read the articles about
the way left-handed racemization overpowered right handed
racemization, or how the planet Mars had evidence of life
(remember that in 1996?)
Oh great! Another missing link.
Or, all of the above.
Oh my-- what the?--- Will you look at that! A fish that has legs to walk on land! I just discovered another MISSING LINK!
So, the French ARE descended from chickens?
INTREP
That's what a scientific "theory" does, predict what evidence will subsequently be found. Evolution succeeds again.
Some day the Intelligent Designers might figure out what their "theory" predicts, and then if relevant evidence is found, they will have a small, very small, claim to some validity.
Are there any ID scientists doing any work? Anything? Anyone? ... Bueller? ... Bueller?
Those feathers look like they would have helped with keeping warm. I have often thought that feathered creatures and small and burrowing creatures survived major boloid (meteor/comet) hits because if the ozone layer was destroyed for a time they would have been protected from direct radiation. If they find longer feathers of this type, then I would take that as an argument for soaring or long semi-arial leaping as well.