Posted on 02/21/2008 2:33:23 AM PST by Southerngl
SAN FRANCISCO — Google Inc. will begin storing the medical records of a few thousand people as it tests a long-awaited health service that's likely to raise more concerns about the volume of sensitive information entrusted to the Internet search leader.
The pilot project to be announced Thursday will involve 1,500 to 10,000 patients at the Cleveland Clinic who volunteered to an electronic transfer of their personal health records so they can be retrieved through Google's new service, which won't be open to the general public.
Each health profile, including information about prescriptions, allergies and medical histories, will be protected by a password that's also required to use other Google services such as e-mail and personalized search tools.
Google views its expansion into health records management as a logical extension because its search engine already processes millions of requests from people trying to find about more information about an injury, illness or recommended treatment.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
So did they ask the patients involved if they want their records stored in this manner?
Oh wait...they don’t own those records the hospital does.
Wow, what a staggeringly bad idea. Is search engine technology really an appropriate combination with private health records?
I've been told you live longer that way too;-P
My Doc still uses manila file folders and lined paper... He refuses to digitize due to the lack of privacy and possible liability. I appreciate his concern, but he is a dying breed....
I’ve said if before, you have to be nuts to sign-up for a g-mail account (or whatever they call it). Whatever you’ve written and to who, they store it. They continue to build files/profiles on people under the auspices of defining customers for targeted advertising. Google “big-breasted redheads” and it goes into your “Horn Dog” tab in their file on you.
I had to send a letter to stop them from opening up one of my books for their search function. In 4-5 searches, you could read the whole book. They stopped, but I’m sure there were undefined damages done to my pocket book.
They are the epitome of “1984.”
Oh STOP it.
This is MUCH more interesting when we can demonize someone. And hospitals, like BIG OIL are such a juicy target because they obviously are out to extract every red cent they can without having to deliver any benefit.
Sheesh, why are you actually READING the article???
>>>>I’ve said if before, you have to be nuts to sign-up for a g-mail account
I don’r entirely disagree, but some of us have thought about the implications of using Gmail (and other Google services) and decided that the price (a certain amount of privacy) is worth the tradeoff (access to some useful Google tools such as Gmail).
if there were a "sixth column" google would be it.
***
brought to you by the firm that showed anyone who could key in your telephone number an actual arial photograph of your house, your street, your neighborhood....
death-to-databases alert.
privacy on the ropes again.
They’ll be able to tip off their Chinese buddies who’s in the market for harvested organs.
I love this argument: "oh yeah, I've decided the tradeoff is worth it, for the benefits..."
I mean, the "argument" might almost be valid for as long as it takes you type it if the email service itself didn's completely suck.
But even if it could read your mail for you and your mind for a reply, and shine your shoes, there is no price that is high enough to compensate for the documentation and dissemination of one's most intimate private information, even if it wasn't guaranteed by the laws of history and human nature to be misused.
Disabuse yourself of this sophistry. It's la-la-libertarian speak, and it's in direct denial of reality.
This is great news. While the privacy concerns are valid, the fact that Google is making an attempt to put volunteer’s patient records online is commendable. With the current diversity and proprietory nature of EMR/EHR systems, communication between providers is quite a challenge.
Google’s attempt might well force providers to make some attempts at coming to an agreement on common data terms and might actually achieve what HIPAA hasn’t been able to re: communication between disparate provider s/w systems.
“My Doc still uses manila file folders and lined paper... He refuses to digitize due to the lack of privacy and possible liability. I appreciate his concern, but he is a dying breed....”
He probably refuses to digitize because the average cost of an EMR implementation is close to $50 000/license and usually requires a change to the provider’s/practice’s workflow. Some healthcare providers are notorious for slow adoption of IT and anything that can accelerate this process is a positive.
what is it with Google?
these Stalinists are pissing me off!
is there software that will totaly Block Google from even getting near My Computer???
WRONG! I am retired IT (AT&T & BELL LABS) and proud to say hold a US patent for a unique software program with artificial intelligence so I do have some credentials.
I will never trust the democrats or any government agency with regard to private records. Anyone with a high profile or threat to a Clintoon will eventually reap the wrath of those criminals.... Have you forgotten the FBI files?
I can't tell you how often that crew showed up at our door....
I am sure there is a nice community group hospital near you that can help you out.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.