Posted on 02/20/2008 7:15:31 AM PST by Pinetop
Barack Obama now faces a new challenge - one that is sure to be much more scandalous than anything he's seen so far. If the allegations are to be believed, it's also a scandal that his campaign has tried to cover up. A Minnesota man has come forth, claiming that he took cocaine in 1999 with Obama, the then-Illinois legislator, and participated in homosexual acts with him.
Larry Sinclair, the man making the claims, said his story was ignored by the news media. Still not willing to let this one slip quietly under the rug, Sinclair made a YouTube video in which he made his case. It's had over half a million views already, but the story has still been largely ignored by the news media.
Sinclair's next step was to file a suit in Minnesota District Court, in which he alleges threats and intimidation by the Democratic presidential candidate's staff.
Still out to prove that he is telling the truth, Sinclair said he is willing to submit to a polygraph test. A website (WhiteHouse.com) has come forth offering him $10,000 for the right to record the polygraph test, and another $100,000 if he passes it.
Sinclair lives in Duluth, Minnesota, and in his filing, charges that his civil rights have been violated by Barack Obama and the Democratic Party. Obama, David Axelrod of AKP Message & Media in Chicago, and the Democratic National Committee have been named as defendants in the case.
Sinclair, who describes himself as gay, claims they met in an upscale Chicago lounge. They left in Sinclair's limo, where the drug use and sex allegedly took place for the first time. Sinclair says that Obama smoked crack cocaine, and that he snorted powder cocaine provided by Obama.
Sinclair, 46, says that he no longer uses drugs. He claims to be physically disabled, but says that he was not physically impaired in 1999 when they met.
Regarding the claims, Sinclair said:
"My motivation for making this public is my desire for a presidential candidate to be honest. I didn't want the sex thing to come out. But I think it is important for the candidate to be honest about his drug use as late as 1999."
God - wouldn’t it be something to discover Obama has HIV?
No Democrat cared back in 1992 that Bill Clinton was fooling around. Why should anyone expect the Democrats today would care if Obama was doing the same?
Did Sinclair save the blue dress?
Bill: Team 1 go! Team 2 go!
Hill: This is what you have been training for - make me proud. (maniacal cackles...)
This kind of thing is hard to be believed. But I wonder where Hillary fits into this?
whoops. wrong sinclair.
Heck, this is even better, he’ll be the darling of the party, a drugged out homo.
Hillary will have to start snorting publicly while she snacks on the carpet.
‘Obama, David Axelrod of AKP’
Sounds like a Band.
Lol. Well she can always say, at least Bill was straight.
He does.
High Intensity Vapidity.
Clinton legacy... the gift that keeps on giving.
This has Clinton-pal Larry Flynt’s smelly fingerprints all over it.
This could get Vermont to go for Obama.
I would laugh myself int o the hospital if the wheels came off of the Obama Bus right as he’s poised to be the savior. I already didn’t like his lack of a real message. Then his wife shoots her mouth off about never being proud of her country. Sounds like the same old $hit. We are above the laws that govern you regular people. Bunch of hypocrites.
Well now Chalvez and Obama have something in common ! Coke heads
Memo to: Larry
From: Hillary
Re: Polygraphs
Quick note Larry, have a friend mix in the Valium capsules with the ibuprofen, so you don’t know which is which, so when the polygraph examiner asks “have you taken any tranquilizers or medications which might affect the accuracy of this test?” you can truthfully answer “no, just a couple of ibuprofen capsules for my headache”.
Good luck Larry! :)
>> It’s out there in Ohio..
The wave is building, but I hope it doesn’t crest too soon.
Not until after !O! wins OH and TX. But that’s two full weeks away.
Hillary’s got bigger problems than drugs and scissoring-—the Peter Paul trial is lethal. Whoops, there goes the Democratic Party...mmmmhhh what is Bloomberg thinking...
This has been bubbling for a while. It has to be the Clintons who finally got this into the papers.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.