Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Arctic Oil, Gas Reserves Expected Exceed Alaska's Prudhoe Bay
Rig Zone ^ | February 19, 2008 | Arctic Oil & Gas

Posted on 02/20/2008 6:18:58 AM PST by thackney

Arctic Oil & Gas Corp., a petroleum exploration company, will develop its share of the extensive "Arctic Commons" claims of what may be one of the greatest oil and gas discoveries in history. The Company expects its legal claims to a portion of the prospect to be developed in partnership with both major integrated oil companies and large independent exploration companies.

Prospects to be explored in the arctic seabed are expected to far surpass the greatest nearby discovery, which is Alaska's Prudhoe Bay. The United States has produced over 12.8 billion barrels of oil from this area, which was discovered in 1968. The Wall Street Journal estimated that over 400 billion barrels of oil may be found and produced within the "Arctic Commons." The largest potential oil-gas sedimentary basins are adjacent to secure US Alaska and Canadian territories.

For the world's major independent oil companies, the Arctic Commons Claim represents a unique long-term opportunity to carve out an entire nation-sized remote frontier basin region for oil companies to operate in with lower taxes and imposts, possibly for centuries.

Arctic Oil & Gas Corp. will create a series of strategic exploration, drilling and development alliances in order to locate and develop the oil and gas resources within the Commons. The Company's management expects to finalize and announce a series of financial partnerships in the near future to provide the wherewithal to develop and drill the "Arctic Commons."

Peter Sterling, CEO of Arctic Oil & Gas Corporation, stated that, "In a world nearing a point when oil will be seriously scarce and expensive, Management believes that, subject to exploration proving successful, and with the help of increasing Canadian oil-sands resources supplies, the Arctic Commons Abyssal could contain enough oil and gas to provide America with perhaps 5-10 million barrels per day OEL, providing complete energy security at reasonable prices to North American Consumers for between 100 to 200 years. Thus the Arctic Commons abyssal is a potential US nation-saving energy resource that should be husbanded and protected vigorously."


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: arctic; energy; naturalgas; oil
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

1 posted on 02/20/2008 6:18:59 AM PST by thackney
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: thackney

What are the odds that we’ll actually use it?


2 posted on 02/20/2008 6:21:59 AM PST by Army Air Corps (Four fried chickens and a coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Army Air Corps
What are the odds that we’ll actually be allowed to use it?
3 posted on 02/20/2008 6:24:45 AM PST by listenhillary (They should have hung the first person that said "there ought to be a law...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: thackney

What are the odds that Arctic Oil & Gas Corp will actually find any oil? I’m betting 10:1 against finding anything producible!


4 posted on 02/20/2008 6:28:51 AM PST by PlanoMike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PlanoMike

I’ll take that bet. Name your figure.


5 posted on 02/20/2008 6:31:25 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Would somebody please tell me what the difference is between drilling for the oil in Prudehoe Bay and drilling for the oil in ANWR?..............


6 posted on 02/20/2008 6:32:18 AM PST by Red Badger ( We don't have science, but we do have consensus.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PlanoMike

Don’t bet against Thackney on oil matters..............


7 posted on 02/20/2008 6:33:17 AM PST by Red Badger ( We don't have science, but we do have consensus.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
Prudhoe Bay is under the control of Alaska.

ANWR is under the control of the Federal Government.

If ANWR was under Alaska’s control, oil would have been flowing decades ago.

8 posted on 02/20/2008 6:35:28 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Before we bet offline, remember the Gulf of Alaska sure shot.


9 posted on 02/20/2008 6:35:55 AM PST by PlanoMike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Army Air Corps

My bet is that the caribou will trump a chance for US oil independence.


10 posted on 02/20/2008 6:41:04 AM PST by The Great RJ ("Mir we bleiwen wat mir sin" or "We want to remain what we are." ..Luxembourg motto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: thackney
Me too....The oil geologists these days are darn good and companies do not invest into expensive exploration (Arctic Location) unless they have a very good indication as to good returns.

Don't forget Jack#2 in 7000 ft of water with the test well yielding 6000 bpd with an estimated 3-15 billion barrels located their.

Is that why you're back in Texas now Thackney for the upgrade?

11 posted on 02/20/2008 6:43:36 AM PST by RSmithOpt (Liberalism: Highway to Hell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
Would somebody please tell me what the difference is between drilling for the oil in Prudehoe Bay and drilling for the oil in ANWR?..............

Politics.

12 posted on 02/20/2008 6:44:35 AM PST by okie01 (THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA: Ignorance on Parade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: PlanoMike

Gulf of Alaska has not been opened to exploration by the Federal Government.

Parts of the Beaufort Sea and Chukchi Sea off the Northern Coast of Alaska are already out for leases and Shell has begun their exploration already.

When the government won’t stand in the way, we will find oil.


13 posted on 02/20/2008 6:45:05 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: RSmithOpt
Is that why you're back in Texas now Thackney for the upgrade?

Family health issues was the main drive for us back at this time. We loved Alaska but there is a growing anti-development attitude driven by those in the lower 48 trying to make Alaska one giant park. More than 100 million acres isn't enough for some. They forget that Alaska was purchased for its resources and argue against land that was specifically set aside for oil exploration, like area 1002, the coastal plain of ANWR.

Plenty of work down here. I'm doing refinery upgrades these days. I have only done a very little offshore work, but my current company does a lot. In time I may get to see some of than, just not now.

14 posted on 02/20/2008 6:50:23 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: The Great RJ

The Saudis should give the Caribou an award for their work.


15 posted on 02/20/2008 6:50:29 AM PST by Army Air Corps (Four fried chickens and a coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: thackney

The Gulf of Alaska OCS was drilled extensively in the late 60’s and the 70’s and was a total bust!


16 posted on 02/20/2008 6:54:48 AM PST by PlanoMike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: PlanoMike
I disagree with the claim it was drilled “extensively”. Much of the most promising areas are not permitted for exploration. The ban continues today.
17 posted on 02/20/2008 7:06:14 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: PlanoMike
Mike,

I'll put up $1,000 against you, we'll put the money in an escrow account. Contact me via private email.

18 posted on 02/20/2008 7:08:12 AM PST by USS Alaska (Nuke the terrorist savages - In Honor of Standing Wolf)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Army Air Corps
What are the odds that we’ll actually use it?

With our witless and gutless Congress, the odds are high that we will use it, but only foreign countries will be allowed to drill it.

19 posted on 02/20/2008 7:11:03 AM PST by Pearls Before Swine (Is /sarc really needed?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Not to get into a pissing contest, but you said “Gulf of Alaska has not been opened to exploration by the Federal Government.” You then contradicted yourself by saying “I disagree with the claim it (Gulf of Alaska) was drilled “extensively”.” Please see http://www.mms.gov/alaska/fo/wellhistory/GOAWELLS.HTM that lists the 12 wells that were drilled. I admit 12 wells is a small number to cover the Gulf and not extensively as I said. I claim a Senior Moment, what’s your excuse? :>)


20 posted on 02/20/2008 7:19:42 AM PST by PlanoMike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson