Posted on 02/19/2008 11:46:19 AM PST by HD1200
We're not ready to share all the details about our upcoming evening lie-detecting with Obama accuser Larry Sinclair, but there are a few things that we want to tell you – namely that we've agreed on a time and place to carry out our wager with Mr. Sinclair.
We're going to meet him on Tuesday, February 26th at a undisclosed location in New York City. We've picked a polygraph expert, too: a renowned expert who has been involved in quite a few high-profile cases who we're not going to name until the results are not only in, but have been verified by a second renowned expert..
Then, we'll post the results, the names of both polygraph experts, and other relevant information, along with video and pictures, here on Whitehouse.com. Since the outcome of the test will be vital interest to the voting public, our findings will be made available before the presidential primaries in Texas and Ohio slated for March 4. That's all for now, but check back for updates
BUMP again for the evening crew.
I don’t think it will make any difference even if it is true.
I can think of a few other politiicans on both sides of the aisle (a very narrow aisle this time around)I’d like to see take a polygraph...
Certainly not to Democrats, but there are plenty of independents and undecideds who work and pay taxes and are raising families.... it will matter to them if Obama is doing cocaine with his gay lover just as much as to it matters to Republicans.
Let’s say he fails it. Then, according to Obama-supporters, it shows that he’s a liar and that he can’t be trusted and the establishment will do anything to keep him from getting elected.
But let’s say he passes it. Everyone knows that a lie detector test isn’t fail-proof and can be gamed fairly easily.
Obama supporters will remind us of that, and they’ll again remind the public that the establishment will do anything to keep him from getting elected. And if they’re smart, they’ll throw in a mention or two of some non-Obama scandals that plenty of proof exists for.
If this guy had independent proof, he wouldn’t need a lie-detector test. And without independent proof, this looks desperate and sleazy.
My question is, if he has receipts and the cooperation of the driver, why would he need a lie detector?
Without independent proof the guy who got dumpted out of his wheelchair by the deputy would look desperate and sleazy. Fortunately, the wheelchair guy had the video.
Can you imagine how much the Enquirer would pay for the video of Osama in the limousine.
How can they not be valid? Just because the courts never allow them doesn't mean anything!
(me = knows they aren't valid).
http://csicop.org/si/2001-07/polygraph.html
I can imagine lots of things. Is there any evidence that there is a video?
The other problem I have with this is that this guy is an admitted drug user. People like that tend to have poor impulse control. And having seen the video, this guy doesn't seem like the sharpest tool in the shed.
But since Obama has run for office before, it would take a massive amount of impulse control and a fair amount of intelligence to somehow figure that when Obama was running previously wouldn't have been the time to release this. That he should somehow wait for a more opportune time.
And like I said, he doesn't seem like the kind of guy to plan that far ahead. Does he to you?
The receipts are merely circumstantial, placing Mr. Sinclair at the scene but not Obama. The limo driver knows whether B. Hussein got into the limo with Larry Sinclair. Thus the driver's recollections are key here. Mr. Sinclair says that the limo driver will come forward and corroborate the allegations at an appropriate time. I don't blame either Mr. Sinclair or the driver for proceeding cautiously and deliberately. People who endanger the success of powerful people sometimes encounter serious troubles, not least in Chicago.
So the receipts are basically useless. I have receipts that prove I was in NYC the same time as President Bush several years ago (I have the receipts because I keep a scrap book. I know the President was there because of the news). But that doesn't prove anything specific. I didn't meet or see him.
The limo driver knows whether B. Hussein got into the limo with Larry Sinclair. Thus the driver's recollections are key here. Mr. Sinclair says that the limo driver will come forward and corroborate the allegations at an appropriate time.
But the nameless driver hasn't yet come forward, because...
I don't blame either Mr. Sinclair or the driver for proceeding cautiously and deliberately. People who endanger the success of powerful people sometimes encounter serious troubles, not least in Chicago.
So why does it makes more sense to keep the driver's identity secret and drag it out? If any of it is true, Obama or his people know who the driver is or know how they can find out. Politicians keep detailed diaries, or their secretaries do.
It seems that if the driver felt he were in danger, he would come forward sooner, not later. And especially not only after a lie detector test that only Larry Sinclair stands to benefit from.
Well, we can speculate about what's going through the head of the limo driver, but he knows his situation better than anyone else ever will. The website whitehouse.com reports that the polygraph is scheduled for next Tuesday. At that point they will presumably publicize the results and everyone will take it from there. If Larry Sinclair is shown to be likely lying then it is a sleazy story that ends right there. If the polygraph experts say that they think Mr. Sinclair is likely telling the truth (and he consequently collects $100K) then there will be a flurry of interest and speculation about what will come next. But if $100K changes hands over this, that in and of itself will be a story, one that Team Obama cannot be very happy about.
If 100K changes hands over this, the MSM will say that this guy has been bought & sold for his story.
The MSM will cover for Black Jesus however they can. This story will play out, one way or the other, in the blogosphere.
I think our conversation is done.
No need to insult our Lord.
“I hope he doesn’t blow it.”
I got that. Very funny.
bttt
bttt again
Has Drudge had anything about this yet?
Who cares!!!!!!!!!!!!
Anybody with a brain can defeat a polygraph.
The polygraph has a zero success rate in catching a turncoat CIA or FBI agent.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.