Sharia law may result in 'legal apartheid'

telegraph ^ | 10/02/2008

[Righting]

Sharia law may result in 'legal apartheid' By Jonathan Wynne-Jones, Religious Affairs Correspondent 10/02/2008

Senior religious leaders attack multiculturalism and sharia law today, warning that they are "disastrous", socially divisive and are destroying Britain's culture and values.

[vpintheak]

DUH!!

[the anti-liberal]

Ya think they're finally catching on?

But with Britain joining the EU and adopting the Euro, I don't think they're Britain anymore anyway, so what's to save?

[sageb1]

As stupid as Rowan was in making the original comments, it may be a blessing in disguise if it succeeds in waking up the sheeple.

[PGR88]

Europe is slowly dismantling its character, and it will all end very badly. The idea from Obama that somehow we need to “improve our image” with countries that are going out of business is appalling.

[VOA]

bump

[joshhiggins]

Britain needs to enforce strict by the book "Sharia Law" upon anyone in Britain who claims to be mohammedan.

Sharia law is a tool the mohammedans use to control their subjects. They would absolutely hate it if Britain used their Sharia laws to control the mohammedans within it's borders.

[the anti-liberal]

You mean adopt their code but change the terms within it? Interesting.

Even so, and no matter how much pleasure may be had in turning the tables, their law is still backward and archaic - adopting them would be akin to returning Britain to the Dark Ages.

The poor Brits deserve better than that - they need their culture and way of life returned to them. They need to take it back.

Else the sun has truly set on Britain.

[PeterFinn]

The threat of islam will not be recognized until it is too late. Europe is setting us up for the next world war same as they did for WW2 by ignoring the threat of fascism until it was too late.

[Jacquerie]

Cardinal Murphy-O'Connor, the leader of the Roman Catholic Church in England and Wales, said that the Government's promotion of multiculturalism had destroyed the unity that used to hold society together.

Hmmm. The leader of a once banned religion defends English traditions. The leader of the state sponsored English religion encourages surrender. These are strange times.

Slightly off topic - When was Catholicism once again allowed in England?

[Righting]

I really want to think of this specific Mr. O’Conner as a loner.