Posted on 02/18/2008 6:46:30 AM PST by chopperman
Just mentioned on Fox. There's a tape.
indeed, if you have fired a gun and seen the shell after it has even hit jello you would know that the bullit they have hit nothing but cotton
True, he only fell into the "movie script/book deal" mire because he claimed never to have used a word that probably everyone on the planet has used at least once in their lives:
Hence, I'd have asked if the interrogator believed himself to be totally innocent and therefore able to "...cast the first stone".
Furman has the skills, he shouldn't have fallen for that line.
you want this bridge I have for sale.....you would obviously buy anything if you belive this fairy tale
thank you....that Freepers could believe the Osawald myth is amazing to me...
Good God man, all that BS about him using a “word” had nothing to do with anything...The time line, and evidence were all there. It didn’t lie. No one bought into that BS about him using a “word” or not. That was all brought up to deceive and kick up dust to distract the ignorant and support those more than willing to defend a double murderer.
At least my fairy tale wasn't written by Oliver Stone and other lefties who try to cover up for the communist gunman and implicate Republicans.
As I said earlier, I don’t think of the WTC as a crime scene any more than I think the USS Arizona is.
9/11 was an act of war. The JFK assassination was a murder committed by a lone gunman.
lighten up, while you still can
Unless Oswald took a second job as JFK’s Scheduler, the text you post is false.
thanks dragnet, i posted the same at #47... according to a couple posts back to me, i thought i was the only one to think such craziness...
I’ve been to Winslow, went to a hole in the wall Mexican Joint,pretty good.
This is true, but don't bad-mouth the Mannlicher-Carcano. It served as a perfectly good military rifle in it's day: Reliable, accurate, and chambered in a powerful military cartridge.
Italians do not make lousy firearms.
The Mannlicher-Carcano was strictly for field personnel, it was never intended as a sniper’s rifle.
You don't know what you're talking about. Of course it was a crime scene.
9/11 was an act of war.
Really, then why wasn't war formally declared against the aggressor countries? We know who they are.
Of course, it didn't need to be a long-range 'sniper' rifle considering that the shots fired at President Kennedy by Oswald only ranged from 44 to 88 yards. Any military rifle of the 20th Century will hold a 4 inch group at that range, and the grouping on Kennedy was about nine inches for two shots with one visible miss.
Entirely expected results, really.
LOL! Mr. Ramsbotham strikes again!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.