True, he only fell into the "movie script/book deal" mire because he claimed never to have used a word that probably everyone on the planet has used at least once in their lives:
Hence, I'd have asked if the interrogator believed himself to be totally innocent and therefore able to "...cast the first stone".
Furman has the skills, he shouldn't have fallen for that line.
Good God man, all that BS about him using a “word” had nothing to do with anything...The time line, and evidence were all there. It didn’t lie. No one bought into that BS about him using a “word” or not. That was all brought up to deceive and kick up dust to distract the ignorant and support those more than willing to defend a double murderer.