Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

McCain: "Winning in the fall will be 'uphill battle' (just what we needed to hear...)
CNN ^ | Feb. 17, 2008 | by Rebecca Sinderbrand

Posted on 02/17/2008 9:08:26 AM PST by jdm

** EXCERPT **

(CNN) — Likely GOP nominee John McCain said Sunday that beating an energized Democratic party in a fall election fight would be “an uphill battle all the way.”

The Arizona senator told George Stephanopoulos on ABC’s This Week that he “can out-campaign them, and I can out-debate them, and I can out-perform them” but conceded that he had his work cut out for him in the months ahead.

“…We've got to reunite the party, and we've got to re-energize the party. And I'm prepared to do that. We've got plenty of time. But I won't waste a day,” said McCain.

The Arizona senator, who is close to capturing the number of delegates required to claim the Republican nomination, has struggled to win over much of the GOP’s conservative base. But party leaders have begun to rally to his side: Monday, he is scheduled to receive the endorsement of former President George H.W. Bush.

(Excerpt) Read more at politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: battle; mccain; uphill
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 241-246 next last
To: JasonC
I'm not there yet with a McCain vote. Everybody says he'll keep us safer than any Democrat would, but I seriously doubt the Democratic party wants to lose the WOT - all the rhetoric aside. They hate GWB - and the war was the best way to attack him. But Ted Kennedy and most high-level Dem ops know exactly what is at stake in this war. Obama's rhetoric in the primaries must appeal to liberals - he has to get their votes to win the nomination. Once he becomes the nominee, he will have to campaign more to the center. If he becomes president, more experienced Democrats will be a huge influence on him. He's a party candidate, not a loose cannon. As far as Pres Obama on social issues, that won't be good news. But I agree with a lot of other Freepers who state that Republicans in the senate and congress will have a tough time defeating liberal policies inflicted by a Republican president...it will be much easier legislatively for senate and house Republicans to oppose liberal policies coming from a Democrat.

When we invaded Iraq, many Dems made pretty eloquent statements on the need to invade. Once we were engaged in war, however, Dems hammered Bush because they saw it as a political vulnerability. Do the democrats hate the WOT? Maybe some or many do. But just as we say.."liberals hate George Bush more than they love freedom," I think the Dems really hate losing more than they hate the war. If the Democratic party has realized that they need to prosecute the war and win it in order to keep power, then that's what they'll do. IMHO, for what it's worth.

121 posted on 02/17/2008 12:04:48 PM PST by floozy22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: Rudder
He will fight it well, I'll vote for him, and the country not you will decide whether he wins. I think it is a long shot and Obama will probably win. But I will be trying to stop Obama, and you will be working for him. If he wins and is ruinous for the country, the blood on your hands, not on mine.
122 posted on 02/17/2008 12:10:26 PM PST by JasonC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: isrul
An actual conservative republican. You know, the kind of republican who actually votes republican in general elections. You know, the kind of conservative who has been here eight years fighting every battle. Not the kind of useless coward who can't face reality and runs away bawling as soon as their favorite pet cause doesn't sweep all before it every single time.
123 posted on 02/17/2008 12:12:17 PM PST by JasonC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: jim35
Yes he is a hawk, and you can ask Ahmadinejad want counts as a hawk.

I agree with him on waterboarding, it is flat stupid to hand our enemies that kind of PR for something we are going to use all of three times. It wrecked the French in Algeria and it is a stupid policy all the way down.

124 posted on 02/17/2008 12:13:52 PM PST by JasonC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: Bear_Slayer
What concerns me is when Son of Cain talks about reaching “across” and winning CONSERVATIVES within the party.

Hmmmm.......
Son of Cain.....
I like it!
Has a certain je ne sais quoi......
ummm....
Class....
About it.....

I think I'll use that instead of calling him McLame or McScum
Thank you

125 posted on 02/17/2008 12:15:43 PM PST by Fiddlstix (Warning! This Is A Subliminal Tagline! Read it at your own risk!(Presented by TagLines R US))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: JasonC
The tone of your posts indicates you are simply one of McCain’s name calling bots. I’ve seen your posts to others. You’re trying to play cyber bully but it just won’t work. You don’t intimidate anyone.
126 posted on 02/17/2008 12:18:53 PM PST by isrul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: floozy22
Ted Kennedy literally opened a back channel to the Kremlin at the height of the cold war to discuss ways to undermine Ronald Reagan. Looking for realism in the present koolaid drinking democratic party is a fool's errand. They are defeatist to the bottom of their boots.

Do you think any of them will support someone like Musharrif at the cost of their sacred NYT holiness on democracy? It isn't going to happen. They will demand socialist left candidates in all countries and only support those, with litmus tests for support that no one effective can pass.

Hillary is marginally more realist and hardnosed than Obama, perhaps. She might fire 20 cruise missiles over the course of her presidency. Obama will bend over backwards to give terrorists whatever they want, and Iran will get nuclear weapons on his watch, untouched.

And you can help that happen. Or not. Your call.

127 posted on 02/17/2008 12:19:24 PM PST by JasonC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: isrul
I've been here 8 years and posted over 50,000 times on literally thousands of threads on literally hundreds of issues dear to conservative causes. You don't fool anyone. And you don't speak for the members of this site, either.
128 posted on 02/17/2008 12:21:14 PM PST by JasonC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: JasonC

The hysterics are coming from folks like yourself. People who, I am sure consider themselves good, strong conservatives but generally tend to wilt in the face of controversy, shut up and get in line to vote for someone simply because they have that magic “R” next to their name.

It’s when confronted with other conservatives that REFUSE to sell out for a piece of s**t such as McCain, that you otherwise gentle folk start getting all hysterical.

We are not hysterical, we are simply saying “no, my principles ARE more important that YOUR power.” John McCain will not ever BE President because if you look at his record of betrayal over at least the past 8 - 9 years, he does not DESERVE to be President.

Now you can do with that what you will, but I genuinely suggest that you have a nice day.


129 posted on 02/17/2008 12:31:45 PM PST by Grunthor (If I don't get to Carley Simon's house I'll never know if that song was about me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Grunthor
Name one controversy in the face of which I have ever wilted.

You can't. It is pure slander.

The country does not deserve an Obama presidency. Our dead in Iraq do not deserve an Obama retreat. The people of Iran and of Israel do not deserve Ahmadinejad effortlessly getting nukes, which Obama will let happen.

And what you plan to do about it, is go fishing. Then you pretend that is a moral thing to do on your part. It isn't, it is the height of irresponsible partisan pique. It is exactly like Dems knifing Bush over the war because they saw ideological advantage in it, and the country be damned.

And I sincerely suggest you give up politics. You don't have the sense of duty for it.

130 posted on 02/17/2008 12:44:19 PM PST by JasonC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

Comment #131 Removed by Moderator

To: FReepapalooza

Maybe. That’s one way of looking at it. Or spinning it. Another would be that you’re gonna agree with anything that agrees with you and discount any contrary evidence as tainted.


132 posted on 02/17/2008 12:45:23 PM PST by samtheman (McCain: Not as good as a real Republican, not as bad as a real Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: squidly

The statement that will really come back to haunt him is that we will be in Iraq for 100 years.

Dumb, dumb, dumb and dumber.


133 posted on 02/17/2008 12:46:46 PM PST by no dems (Global Warming advocates have the IQ of a can of Spam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

You needn't worry, no one will pay you. Or cares what you think.

Also, you've been reported to the mods for your amateur porn.

134 posted on 02/17/2008 12:46:51 PM PST by JasonC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TheLawyerFormerlyKnownAsAl

He has already said to Chris Wallace that he would sign the CIR bill right now if presented to him. No doubt, Juan Hernandez, will be standing over his shoulder laughing at the screwed over US Citizens.


135 posted on 02/17/2008 12:47:15 PM PST by dforest (Nothing left to say.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: indylindy

How’s that? I’d say it’s about on the same intellectual level as all your other posts. Essentially: worthless.


136 posted on 02/17/2008 12:47:53 PM PST by samtheman (McCain: Not as good as a real Republican, not as bad as a real Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: JasonC

“Name one controversy in the face of which I have ever wilted.”

I was speaking in generalities.

“It is pure slander.”

Some would call it opinion. If I said that you JasonC, do not have good hygeine and smell like a 3 day dead Yak, THAT would be slander.

But I wouldn’t say that.

Have a nice day.


137 posted on 02/17/2008 12:52:22 PM PST by Grunthor (If I don't get to Carley Simon's house I'll never know if that song was about me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: JasonC

You are a pathetic fool. You are unfit to post as a conservative. You are unfit to decide what is best for the US. It isn’t John McCain.

I needn’t worry though, the voters will make that known come November.

McCain needs to retire, he is an old washed out man, the manchurian candidate, unfit for office and exudes the temperament of someone like you. Nasty.


138 posted on 02/17/2008 12:52:51 PM PST by dforest (Nothing left to say.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: ElPatriota
Well senator, I offer the support you deserve :)...


139 posted on 02/17/2008 12:53:27 PM PST by Sir Francis Dashwood (LET'S ROLL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Grunthor
And again, unable to engage on substance, pure ad hom, toasted like a marshmellow.

Give it up, you lost...

140 posted on 02/17/2008 12:54:40 PM PST by JasonC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 241-246 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson