The Quigley Formula

The Road To Emmaus ^ | F. Earle Fox

[cinives]

Quigley was a favorite professor/mentor of William Clinton at George Washington University. Clinton gave Quigley credit many times during his campaign and tenure as President, signaling to those "in the know" that he was solidly behind the globalist movement.

Like most politicians and industrialists of the 20th century, Quigley had given up on the American Constitution, openly espousing a conspiratorial view of global world government. He agreed with the plan of the globalists to subvert our constitutional order and insert themselves as the elite rulers, as much as possible by stealth, but, if necessary, by force. His only disagreement, apparently, was about their secrecy. Why he would advise them to be open about such evil intentions is not clear.

Quigley's "formula" for attaining the sought for control is the deception of the people via democracy, control of both political parties by the conspiracy so that they are different only on the surface, and swap places in the White House to give the impression of an election. The fact has often been noted by observant voters to have been the case for many elections. It is Lenin's strategy -- tell them whatever they want to hear, until you get enough power to force your will upon them. (Same strategy used by in the homosexual agenda.)

Democracy here means the pseudo "liberal democracy" of socialism, which is the antithesis of a democratic republic under God. By its centralizing vortex, liberal democracy erodes all local communities into a grand illusion of being "America" by virtue of having a federal government, as though the federal government was the creator (and therefore owner) of America rather than Americans in their local communities creating the federal government as their servant.

The conspiracy has succeeded in all but destroying American education, reducing American history to post modern nonsense, taking away a significant part of the foundation of any society's identity, its corporate memory of itself. The process atomizes citizens, turning them into an identity-less mass, subject to the coercive and manipulative power of evil-minded rulers. Government replaces family, school, welfare, drawing the people into an increasingly dependent way of thinking about themselves. Government replaces God.

The conspirators are reconstructing the Tower of Babel. And they will get it.

These facts call into question everything the present Bush administration is doing, both foreign and domestic. It has been clear to this writer for several years that, on the home front, George Bush is no friend of the Constitution, that he is a socialist at heart, and, as his support of the Mexican immigration debacle shows, an avid supporter of globalist treason. If he is a sincere Christian, he is an extremely poorly educated one, spiritually immature, and enormously naive -- making him controllable, and thus a patsy for the conspiracy.

Quigley had been given a two year period in the mid 1900's in which he had access to the archives of globalist leaders, meaning, no doubt, that they trusted him to do a good job for them. He may have spilled too many beans, however, as Tragedy & Hope was withdrawn by the publisher for a period. Both books are now available at The Reality Zone.

The really astonishing thing is that the globalists and those like them can write quite candidly about their intentions, proceed to carry them out, and the population almost 100% goes on oblivious of the facts. And worse, does not want to hear about it. That is how Hitler got into power.

[allmendream]

How about convincing me that the world population is actually going down. You could start with that.

Then you might try convincing me that Scientific research (which I do every day) is under the control of a worldwide conspiracy of secret governance.

Then you can try to convince me that UFO’s are somehow involved in the end times described in Revelations.

Logical, congruence, integrated? Seems a hodgepodge to me.

[B4Ranch]

Heaven forbid that anything should be done to discredit police testimony! All of these people are certainly local heroes and pillars of the community in which they serve.

[Quix]

I think the level of their operational applications have only reached slowing the increase at present.

30 million murdered infants in this country alone is no small number of souls.

AIDS et al have done some real damage in Africa . . .

One knowledgeable source I’ve emailed thinks they MAY start one of their more overt major efforts toward such as early as this March. We shall see.

But I don’t expect any of this to convince you in the slightest.

Those with eyes to see, amongst the lurkers, may learn something, however.

In terms of scientific research . . .

When was the last time you or even anyone you know of . . . succeeded in getting a professional article published that didn’t fit the DOGMA of the RELIGION OF SCIENCE in it’s CURRENT ecclesiastically pontificated and promulgatted version?

[Quix]

BTW, if I might dare to ask . . .

who’s side are you on?

[B4Ranch]

The full unedited, on-line text of None Dare Call It Conspiracy is available to anyone wishing to read it.

[Quix]

That’s certainly one main place that so many arms of the octopus clasp tentacles together.

[Quix]

Oh, I’m a strong supporter of police folks . . .

However, some horrible things have been done by some few bad apples.

And, . . . the whole class is being set-up to play a gestapo role.

So such a move is still somewhat alarming, to me.

[Quix]

THANKS TONS.

[B4Ranch]

>Oh, I’m a strong supporter of police folks . . .<

At one time I was. With the increased corruption, especially in the Border Patrol, I am losing my faith in them all.

[GiovannaNicoletta]

read later

[Quix]

The major local municipality had about 70% of it’s police force leave town in the middle of the night . . . on hearing about a major corruption investigation ready to lower the hammer . . .

That’s a pretty big chunk!

Yeah, I loathe such corruption and folks party to it deserve what they’ll likely reap.

[wolfcreek]

With someone like Soros providing funding for all the front runners, I’d say they have a lock on the situation. At least on the American political scene.

Then there’s that question of Arab support for Hillary. Takes away from the argument about certain facets acting outside the box. One Worldness is near reality.

[Quix]

I think you are quite right. Very insightful.

Thanks.

[allmendream]

Whose side am I on?

I swore an oath by God to protect and defend the Constitution of the U.S.A. against all enemies foreign and domestic. That is my allegiance, that is my ideal, and that is my goal; Constitutional governance by the will of the governed that recognizes the natural rights of man endowed upon us by our Creator.

I am also on the side of Scientific discovery and I know that nothing in Science, which is a study of Creation, can or will deny the Creator; although it is certainly good at shredding false dogma like heliocentricity. I am on the side of finding cures and treatments for diseases that plague mankind, and make lives better for people.

I am on the side of History. History that needs to be accurately portrayed and misattributed quotes and fraudulent documents need to be exposed and excoriated. I am on the side that believes that Winston Churchill was a good man whose eyewitness testimony to history was not propaganda for mass consumption, but the dreams hopes and actions of a brilliant man who fought to preserve Democracy in the face of Fascist Tyranny and left a lasting record for posterity. I am not on the side that thinks Communism, National Socialism, and Representative Republics all colluded to allow the U.S.A. and Britain's view of Representative Republics prevail.

Robert R. Wilson was called upon to defend government expenditure on a Superconducting Super colider. He was asked to justify this expenditure in terms of our own national security interests, i.e. ‘bullets and bombs’. Perhaps R.R. Wilson was a bit sensitive to the Science = bullets and bombs formulation, having worked at Los Alamos (that is the A-bomb for those of you in Rio Linda); but he struck upon a profound truth. Science, like Art or Architecture or Music; is a worth goal in and of itself; and being good at it is one of the things that can make us proud to be Americans.

Senator Pastore: “Is there anything connected with the hopes of this accelerator that in any way involves the security of the country?”
Robert Wilson: “No sir, I don’t believe so.”
Pastore: “Nothing at all?”
Wilson: “Nothing at all.
Pastore: “It has no value in that respect?
—————
Wilson: “It has only to do with the respect with which we regard one another, the dignity of men, our love of culture. It has to do with are we good painters, good sculptures, great poets? I mean all the things we really venerate in our country and are patriotic about. It has nothing to do directly with defending our country except to make it worth defending.”

WHAT SIDE ARE YOU ON?

[wolfcreek]

Bookmarked for later. Thanks

[Quix]

Thanks.

I’m on the side of God and His righteousness, His priorities, His goals, His ways.

I’m also a 61 year old patriot of These United States—particularly of her Constitution and Constitutionally protected freedoms.

Alas, the Constitution has been wholesale trashed increasingly the last 50 years . . .

I do what I can for the US of A.

But most of my time and energies are more focused on God and His priorities. He will eventually take care of and restore the US of A as George Washington was promised . . . and as Roland Buck (Angels On Assignment) was promised . . .

[Quix]

BTW, I like Churchill, too.

[allmendream]

Heliobacter pylori. The discovery and pathology of this bacteria went against the ‘dogma’ that stress induced stomach acid was the primary cause of Ulcers in humans.

They won the Nobel Prize. That is the reward for going against the grain in Science and proving that you are correct and the prevailing view was incorrect. The problem of most papers that go against what we think we know in Science is either that they are not at all Scientific, and/or they don’t have the data to support their contentions. Nothing is stopping them from publishing, just not in a peer reviewed Scientific Journal whose peers think that it is not Science, not applicable to their field (Many Scientific journals are highly specific), or doesn’t have the data to support its contention.

Once again, Science is not a worldwide conspiracy of agreed upon dogma. Science findings are accepted around the world completely tangential to the religion, politics, or background of the Scientist. Why do you think that is? It isn’t because they all met in a back room and decided “You got to be right about protein X, so let me contradict you on protein Y.”; no they duke it out with data and the last hypothesis standing is the operating theory until contradictory data comes in.

[allmendream]

You like Churchill but think he was in on the worldwide conspiracy? That his massive contribution to the Historic record was all lies and propaganda and “lets fool them with this tripe” B.S.? How could you possibly if you think he was colluding with Nazi’s and Communists to get many thousands of people killed in a war that was all just for show?

[Quix]

That one was quite a while ago.

What percentage of such do you believe get published . . . against the RELIGION OF SCIENTISM DOGMAS?

imho

extremely few . . . and in many disciplines, none.