I think the level of their operational applications have only reached slowing the increase at present.
30 million murdered infants in this country alone is no small number of souls.
AIDS et al have done some real damage in Africa . . .
One knowledgeable source I’ve emailed thinks they MAY start one of their more overt major efforts toward such as early as this March. We shall see.
But I don’t expect any of this to convince you in the slightest.
Those with eyes to see, amongst the lurkers, may learn something, however.
In terms of scientific research . . .
When was the last time you or even anyone you know of . . . succeeded in getting a professional article published that didn’t fit the DOGMA of the RELIGION OF SCIENCE in it’s CURRENT ecclesiastically pontificated and promulgatted version?
They won the Nobel Prize. That is the reward for going against the grain in Science and proving that you are correct and the prevailing view was incorrect. The problem of most papers that go against what we think we know in Science is either that they are not at all Scientific, and/or they don’t have the data to support their contentions. Nothing is stopping them from publishing, just not in a peer reviewed Scientific Journal whose peers think that it is not Science, not applicable to their field (Many Scientific journals are highly specific), or doesn’t have the data to support its contention.
Once again, Science is not a worldwide conspiracy of agreed upon dogma. Science findings are accepted around the world completely tangential to the religion, politics, or background of the Scientist. Why do you think that is? It isn’t because they all met in a back room and decided “You got to be right about protein X, so let me contradict you on protein Y.”; no they duke it out with data and the last hypothesis standing is the operating theory until contradictory data comes in.