Posted on 02/14/2008 12:51:14 PM PST by cinives
Then you might try convincing me that Scientific research (which I do every day) is under the control of a worldwide conspiracy of secret governance.
Then you can try to convince me that UFO’s are somehow involved in the end times described in Revelations.
Logical, congruence, integrated? Seems a hodgepodge to me.
Heaven forbid that anything should be done to discredit police testimony! All of these people are certainly local heroes and pillars of the community in which they serve.
I think the level of their operational applications have only reached slowing the increase at present.
30 million murdered infants in this country alone is no small number of souls.
AIDS et al have done some real damage in Africa . . .
One knowledgeable source I’ve emailed thinks they MAY start one of their more overt major efforts toward such as early as this March. We shall see.
But I don’t expect any of this to convince you in the slightest.
Those with eyes to see, amongst the lurkers, may learn something, however.
In terms of scientific research . . .
When was the last time you or even anyone you know of . . . succeeded in getting a professional article published that didn’t fit the DOGMA of the RELIGION OF SCIENCE in it’s CURRENT ecclesiastically pontificated and promulgatted version?
BTW, if I might dare to ask . . .
who’s side are you on?
That’s certainly one main place that so many arms of the octopus clasp tentacles together.
Oh, I’m a strong supporter of police folks . . .
However, some horrible things have been done by some few bad apples.
And, . . . the whole class is being set-up to play a gestapo role.
So such a move is still somewhat alarming, to me.
THANKS TONS.
>Oh, Im a strong supporter of police folks . . .<
At one time I was. With the increased corruption, especially in the Border Patrol, I am losing my faith in them all.
read later
The major local municipality had about 70% of it’s police force leave town in the middle of the night . . . on hearing about a major corruption investigation ready to lower the hammer . . .
That’s a pretty big chunk!
Yeah, I loathe such corruption and folks party to it deserve what they’ll likely reap.
Then there’s that question of Arab support for Hillary. Takes away from the argument about certain facets acting outside the box. One Worldness is near reality.
I think you are quite right. Very insightful.
Thanks.
I swore an oath by God to protect and defend the Constitution of the U.S.A. against all enemies foreign and domestic. That is my allegiance, that is my ideal, and that is my goal; Constitutional governance by the will of the governed that recognizes the natural rights of man endowed upon us by our Creator.
I am also on the side of Scientific discovery and I know that nothing in Science, which is a study of Creation, can or will deny the Creator; although it is certainly good at shredding false dogma like heliocentricity. I am on the side of finding cures and treatments for diseases that plague mankind, and make lives better for people.
I am on the side of History. History that needs to be accurately portrayed and misattributed quotes and fraudulent documents need to be exposed and excoriated. I am on the side that believes that Winston Churchill was a good man whose eyewitness testimony to history was not propaganda for mass consumption, but the dreams hopes and actions of a brilliant man who fought to preserve Democracy in the face of Fascist Tyranny and left a lasting record for posterity. I am not on the side that thinks Communism, National Socialism, and Representative Republics all colluded to allow the U.S.A. and Britain's view of Representative Republics prevail.
Robert R. Wilson was called upon to defend government expenditure on a Superconducting Super colider. He was asked to justify this expenditure in terms of our own national security interests, i.e. ‘bullets and bombs’. Perhaps R.R. Wilson was a bit sensitive to the Science = bullets and bombs formulation, having worked at Los Alamos (that is the A-bomb for those of you in Rio Linda); but he struck upon a profound truth. Science, like Art or Architecture or Music; is a worth goal in and of itself; and being good at it is one of the things that can make us proud to be Americans.
Senator Pastore: Is there anything connected with the hopes of this accelerator that in any way involves the security of the country?
Robert Wilson: No sir, I dont believe so.
Pastore: Nothing at all?
Wilson: Nothing at all.
Pastore: It has no value in that respect?
Wilson: It has only to do with the respect with which we regard one another, the dignity of men, our love of culture. It has to do with are we good painters, good sculptures, great poets? I mean all the things we really venerate in our country and are patriotic about. It has nothing to do directly with defending our country except to make it worth defending.
WHAT SIDE ARE YOU ON?
Bookmarked for later. Thanks
Thanks.
I’m on the side of God and His righteousness, His priorities, His goals, His ways.
I’m also a 61 year old patriot of These United States—particularly of her Constitution and Constitutionally protected freedoms.
Alas, the Constitution has been wholesale trashed increasingly the last 50 years . . .
I do what I can for the US of A.
But most of my time and energies are more focused on God and His priorities. He will eventually take care of and restore the US of A as George Washington was promised . . . and as Roland Buck (Angels On Assignment) was promised . . .
BTW, I like Churchill, too.
They won the Nobel Prize. That is the reward for going against the grain in Science and proving that you are correct and the prevailing view was incorrect. The problem of most papers that go against what we think we know in Science is either that they are not at all Scientific, and/or they don’t have the data to support their contentions. Nothing is stopping them from publishing, just not in a peer reviewed Scientific Journal whose peers think that it is not Science, not applicable to their field (Many Scientific journals are highly specific), or doesn’t have the data to support its contention.
Once again, Science is not a worldwide conspiracy of agreed upon dogma. Science findings are accepted around the world completely tangential to the religion, politics, or background of the Scientist. Why do you think that is? It isn’t because they all met in a back room and decided “You got to be right about protein X, so let me contradict you on protein Y.”; no they duke it out with data and the last hypothesis standing is the operating theory until contradictory data comes in.
That one was quite a while ago.
What percentage of such do you believe get published . . . against the RELIGION OF SCIENTISM DOGMAS?
imho
extremely few . . . and in many disciplines, none.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.