[MrB]

It would be best if these women hadn’t been taught in today’s educational system that

there is no objective standard (which there is)

so that they could not “settle” for “good enough”, but have a fixed yardstick by which to measure their potential mate.

If women were MORE choosy (about whom they marry, choose to have kids with, etc), men would have to have better character.

[driftdiver]

“If women were MORE choosy (about whom they marry, choose to have kids with, etc), men would have to have better character.’

IMO it should read “If women were more choosy about whom they sleep with”, men would have to have better character.

Women seem to have become the aggressors.

[TalonDJ]

If women were MORE choosy (about whom they marry, choose to have kids with, etc), men would have to have better character.

The thing is that with all that relitivism a lot of folks no longer know HOW to be more choosy. They are not picking the right criteria and are getting burned.

[Keith Brown]

“If women were MORE choosy (about whom they marry, choose to have kids with, etc), men would have to have better character.”

No we wouldn’t.

We’d marry more women from other countries.

Besides it’d never happen, women are too competative and willing to sell each other out.

[monday]

“If women were MORE choosy (about whom they marry, choose to have kids with, etc), men would have to have better character.”

lol, you would think so wouldn’t you. I don’t think it works like that though. People end up with the character they have long before puberty and an interest in the opposite sex kicks in. Changing your character during puberty so as to attract a better mate is beyond most peoples ability.