Posted on 02/13/2008 5:11:04 PM PST by RedRover
A key witness in the upcoming court-marshal of Staff Sgt. Frank Wuterich should not be allowed to testify in Wuterichs behalf, the prosecutor claims in a motion filed in the Haditha Marines case.
Wuterich, 27, is being tried for voluntary manslaughter in connection with the killings of 24 Iraqi citizens in the town of Haditha on Nov. 19, 2005, shortly after a roadside bomb hit a Marine convoy, killing the driver of a Humvee and wounding two other Marines.
Maj. Jeffrey Dinsmore, who was the battalion intelligence officer of Wuterichs unit, has previously revealed that, based on his intelligence briefings, Wuterich and his fellow Kilo Company Marines had been forewarned of a possible insurgent ambush and alerted as to what to look for in particular a white sedan.
But prosecutor Lt. Col. Sean Sullivan is contending that there is no proof Wuterich and his men were so forewarned.
Dinsmore told Newsmax: Basically, [Sullivans] contention is that my procedures of intelligence dissemination could not guarantee that Frank would know enemy TTP's [tactics, techniques, and procedures], the existence of the white sedan on the BOLO [Be On the Lookout for] list, or the intelligence that indicated that an attack was imminent.
The legal logic goes that if I didn't look Frank in the eye and give him the Intel personally, then there is no proof he ever knew it, and it is irrelevant to his specific charges. The burden of the defense is to establish the chain of custody of information, and to prove that my daily information and warnings reached down to the squad level.
In a deposition given to Sullivan on March 26, 2007, Maj. Dinsmore testified that his briefings to Wuterichs unit included information about insurgent TTPs, and warnings about the anticipated appearance of the white car during the ambush.
Wuterich is accused of killing the five occupants of a white car that came on the scene at the time of the attack.
The briefings also warned about the need not to go into suspect structures soft without clearing them first with grenades and gunfire as required in the rules of engagement then in place.
Dinsmore said intelligence about Haditha was received on about 17 November, prior to the attack, in which Weapons Company conducted an operation down in Albu Hyatt, and they had intelligence reports that Syrians were planning a major operation in Haditha.
Dinsmore, a decorated up-from-the ranks officer, monitored the days action in Haditha via radio reports and a Scan Eagle Unmanned Aerial Vehicle he used to follow the action from above. He filed a report providing full details of combat up the chain of command that very night.
His testimony about the attack warning could be crucial to the defense because Wuterich contends he was acting under proper rules of engagement when he ordered his men to assault several houses, which they cleared with grenades and gunfire.
According to Maj. Dinsmore, Sullivan's motion will likely focus on the mechanics of how I made sure Sgt. Wuterich received and understood the information white sedan, enemy TTPs, etc.
I see the motion like this: When Lt. Col. Sullivan came to my office last year, raided the classified material safe, and seized the materials that I was using to aid the defense we discussed again what my doubts were about the government's intentions. I openly doubted his ability or willingness to ensure all information was researched and reviewed, even that information that might eliminate his case.
He was incredulous that I would doubt his willingness to do that. I pled with him to do so. He made a point of giving me his word as an honorable man and as a Marine that he would lay open all information, and if he found information that could potentially exonerate these Marines, he would personally take it to the convening authority and ensure it was seen. This motion doesn't quite live up to that word, as far as I can see.
Mark Zaid, one of Wuterichs civilian attorneys told Newsmax: I cant imagine that Dinsmores testimony wont be allowed. Major Dinsmores testimony is an important piece of the puzzle and I can understand why the prosecution wouldnt want anyone to know about it. But the fact is that his information about insurgent tactics was conveyed directly to the men who engaged in battle in Haditha.
Sullivan, a reserve Marine officer with no combat experience, is a Chicago lawyer who specializes in patent and trademark law, according to his law firms Internet site.
Nat Helms, author of the recent book My Men are Heroes, has written extensively about Haditha. He said: Sullivan, who is prosecuting Wuterich, may eventually face some heat of his own for how and why star prosecution witness [Lance Cpl.] Humberto Mendoza managed to get transferred to Sullivans Chicago-based reserve unit as a driver after he was granted immunity.
The defense also wants to know if Sullivan intervened in making [non-U.S. citizen] Mendozas immigration problems disappear.
And finally, the defense wants to know if Mendozas lawyers allowed their client to be interviewed by prosecutors hunting for a perfect witness before they decided to grant him immunity and provide him the alleged benefits of serving in Chicago instead of staying at Camp Pendleton where he was easily accessible.
I read this stuff and just don’t get it. Maybe I could get a lobotomy and then I could think like a prosecutor.
Thanks for the ping.
I read this stuff and just don’t get it. Maybe I could get a lobotomy and then I could think like a prosecutor.
Thanks for the ping.
This Sullivan sounds like a real piece of work. I pray Sgt. Wuterich’s attorneys prevail.
A damnable witch hunt. Seeking to assuage the feelings and justify the vitriole of the leftist DhimmiRats who are bound and determined to leave unfinished the war on terror. And, that, my friends will an error in judgment of mammoth proportions, if we allow it to happen.
SSgt Wuterich should be exonerated. Charges should never have been brought, IMO. And, to have as a prosecutor an attorney without criminal trial experience is, in itself, criminal. This is immoral, unethical, and should be halted immediately.
They have to either block Dinsmore’s testimony, or clearly impeach him as a witness, or the whole case against the Haditha marines collapses.
In my opinion there never was a case. For trying to block Dinsmore’s testimony which clearly would tend to exonerate the soldiers, you have to wonder why Sullivan isn’t drummed out of the Corps.
Sullivan, who is prosecuting Wuterich, may eventually face some heat of his own for how and why star prosecution witness [Lance Cpl.] Humberto Mendoza managed to get transferred to Sullivans Chicago-based reserve unit as a driver after he was granted immunity.
The defense also wants to know if Sullivan intervened in making [non-U.S. citizen] Mendozas immigration problems disappear.
This Sullivan really smells, IMO!
Stay strong Frank
God willing, this man will be exonerated!!!
Pay attention to pages 31 and 46
Pay attention to pages 31 and 46
Sullivan, a reserve Marine officer with no combat experience, is a Chicago lawyer who specializes in patent and trademark law, according to his law firms Internet site.
Sullivan, who is prosecuting Wuterich, may eventually face some heat of his own for how and why star prosecution witness [Lance Cpl.] Humberto Mendoza managed to get transferred to Sullivans Chicago-based reserve unit as a driver after he was granted immunity. The defense also wants to know if Sullivan intervened in making [non-U.S. citizen] Mendozas immigration problems disappear. And finally, the defense wants to know if Mendozas lawyers allowed their client to be interviewed by prosecutors hunting for a perfect witness before they decided to grant him immunity and provide him the alleged benefits of serving in Chicago instead of staying at Camp Pendleton where he was easily accessible.
Dirty Boot?
Shit bird is more apt.
It seems the prosecution will stop at nothing to get their sacrificial lamb.
The enemy is laughing.
Nam Vet
It would have to be the “short and curlys”. There ain’t nothing else there to tie a string to.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.