Skip to comments.
Clemens Autograph Seekers May Have Broken Federal Law
The New York Times ^
| 02/13/2008
| Duff Wilson
Posted on 02/13/2008 3:26:51 PM PST by pjsbro
Any members of the House oversight committee or their staff who asked Roger Clemens for an autograph during his tour of the Capitol over the past week might have violated a federal law against soliciting things of value from people with interests before the committee, several lawyers with expertise in Congressional ethics laws said.
(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...
TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: clemens; hgh; steroids
1
posted on
02/13/2008 3:27:00 PM PST
by
pjsbro
To: pjsbro
This was the most pathetic waste of time I have ever seen coming from our elected losers.
2
posted on
02/13/2008 3:35:44 PM PST
by
tobyhill
(The media lies so much the truth is the exception)
To: tobyhill
I agree, but I it seemed to me the Repubs were defending Clemens, and the Dems defending McNamee
3
posted on
02/13/2008 3:44:05 PM PST
by
pjsbro
To: pjsbro
I can hear it now: “So, did you or did you not ask for an autograph from Roger Clemens?”
To: pjsbro
Congressional ethics
Now there is an oxymoron of the highest order.
5
posted on
02/13/2008 3:49:35 PM PST
by
microgood
To: Lord Basil
Actually, I would think that any Committee staffers who got an autograph from Clemens would want him to get into the Hall of Fame, which would increase the value of their autograph, and therefore they would at least subliminally want Clemens to be innocent.
6
posted on
02/13/2008 3:52:04 PM PST
by
pjsbro
To: tobyhill
I agree. I SO don’t care if people use drugs, especially steroids, which, if used by adult males in reasonable amounts are fairly harmless.
All the crap about “roid rage” is, well, crap promulgated by liberals who think all things male are evil, so testosterone must be the root of all evil.
I presume liberals like turning the screws to jocks (to get back for wedgies in High School), and nanny-staters like this because, well, they are nanny-staters.
7
posted on
02/13/2008 3:56:18 PM PST
by
MeanWestTexan
(Kol Hakavod Mossad!)
To: tobyhill
Amen. I guess all of the nations concerns have been settled by our astute leaders, so that now
this is all they to ponder.
What a bunch of putzes...
8
posted on
02/13/2008 3:58:40 PM PST
by
PennsylvaniaMom
(I do not want people to be agreeable, as it saves me the trouble of liking them. Jane Austen.)
To: tobyhill
...pathetic waste of time...Started and kept alive by some of the least trustworthy people around, Mitchel, Waxman, McNamee, etc.
9
posted on
02/13/2008 4:12:03 PM PST
by
FreePaul
To: pjsbro
They are above the law. What are you smoking?
10
posted on
02/13/2008 4:29:15 PM PST
by
Ron in Acreage
(Jorge Bush has a 90% approval rating--In Mexico.)
To: pjsbro
Heck, he should have signed autographs on the Capitol steps after. And told the news cameras to be there too! That’s what Rush would do with those people.
11
posted on
02/13/2008 4:30:41 PM PST
by
BobS
To: FreePaul
your list did not include clemens. is that what you meant by etc...?
12
posted on
02/13/2008 4:33:17 PM PST
by
thefactor
(the innocent shall not suffer nor the guilty go free...)
To: pjsbro
If they let senators and reps off for dueling dork-swords and a host of obscene antics still not allowed in R rated movies why on earth would we assume that our Digressional leaders would give a rats a$$ about breaking an ethics misdemeanor?
I'm just sayin'
13
posted on
02/13/2008 4:45:21 PM PST
by
IllumiNaughtyByNature
(Hillary Clinton - It's Her Party and She'll Cry if She Wants to?)
To: pjsbro
If they let senators and reps off for dueling dork-swords and a host of obscene antics still not allowed in R rated movies why on earth would we assume that our Digressional leaders would give a rats a$$ about breaking an ethics misdemeanor?
I'm just sayin'
14
posted on
02/13/2008 4:45:44 PM PST
by
IllumiNaughtyByNature
(Hillary Clinton - It's Her Party and She'll Cry if She Wants to?)
To: pjsbro
This whole process was BS. Clemens is a liar (IMHO)and McNamee is a liar and a chicken-$hit(also MHO) little coward. This should be addressed by the league and not by a circus in DC. That being said, It looks like McNamees lies caught up to him so he had to come clean. At least Pettit and Knoblock were men enough to face the music and tell the truth. There are to many people that have to be lying for Roger’s account to be truthful.
It was ironic that at one point he claimed that a former president had no trouble locating him while he was in a hunting blind. Right after that he started pointing his finger at people like the slick-meister did. He looked pathetic and guilty and now I have lost respect for whom was once my baseball hero. This is a sad day. If he did it, he should have been man enough to just admit it. My seven year old son can tell a whopper but I hope he can learn a lesson from Andy Pettit and Chuck Knoblock instead of Clemens.
15
posted on
02/13/2008 4:47:17 PM PST
by
BOBWADE
To: tobyhill
But they’re doing it for the children, don’t you know. That makes it all right. /s/
16
posted on
02/13/2008 4:54:23 PM PST
by
beandog
(If exercise is so good for you, why does every bone in my body hurt)
To: pjsbro
Who is Roger Clemens and why do people want his signature?
17
posted on
02/13/2008 4:54:32 PM PST
by
AlaskaErik
(I served and protected my country for 31 years. Democrats spent that time trying to destroy it.)
To: pjsbro
INDICT THEM ALL!!!!!!! NOW!!
18
posted on
02/13/2008 4:55:18 PM PST
by
Ann Archy
(Abortion.....The Human Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson